Those are probably some of the easiest videos to find on the internet. Be it file sharing blogs/sites or torrent sites. Just look for them by name - or do a google image search for the file name. Often times it will show "thumbnail sheets" of the video and take you to where the file is being shared.
That said many of those titles are available here too.
Hi all,
Recently I came across few very interesting movies
European Mineral Baths ( pts 1,2,3)
Mature daddy baths
Anyone has these movies?
The European Mineral Baths clips are also known as "Making Friends at the Mineral Baths" - I've only ever seen a part 1 and a part 2. But even those clips aren't the full films that are featured at Spy on Guys.
I have both of those parts. But rather than make a torrent I found them hosted here:
hxxp://www.wupload.com/file/71438904/Making.Friends.at.the.Mineral.Baths.1.avi
hxxp://www.wupload.com/file/71517967/Making.Friends.at.the.Mineral.Baths.2.avi
Mature Daddy Baths seems to also be a part of that same series. Couldn't find much more though.
There's this video that sort of follows the theme but its not part of that series. It's called "Spy Vid German Sauna"
hxxp://www.filesonic.com/file/1609363871/Spy_Vid_German_Sauna.part1.rar
hxxp://www.filesonic.com/file/1613912951/Spy_Vid_German_Sauna.part2.rar
Those are .rar files so you would have to combine them yourself.
YES to both of those screens!
then you can download the file from here:
http://hotfile.com/dl/126440612/d6d11af/Horny_Health_Club_(1996.June).avi.html
I've had this vid for quite some time - pretty amazing stuff. But damn that obnoxious tracking problem. I wish the person who created this video - or the person who initially recorded this video would recode with better equipment. Then again beggars can't be choosers.
Hmmm…video voyeurs are getting kind of sloppy these days it seems. Odd story overall.
At first he thought about putting it back. But then he feared the voyeur would come back to get it. So he decided to tell the Starbucks employees. He said they told him they were too busy to talk to him.
Afraid the camera would just be tossed, he decided to take it home to East Hartford, even though an attorney friend had told him to turn it into police right away.
"Who do you trust?" he asked. "What if you hand it over to somebody and it's gone?"
Zeligzon downloaded the contents of the camera on his computer, fearing he — a frequent Starbucks customer — would see his own private parts on the video.
There were 18 files in the camera with good-quality sound, Zeligzon said. The images showed men using the bathroom, their genitals, buttocks and, in some cases, their faces visible.
hxxp://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-restroom-camera-finder-0812-20110811,0,2430422.story
It's also important to know the risks of the activities that you're doing before you go and do them. In a case like this, doing such a thing in the workplace is probably the worst idea ever, especially considering that employers can fire you for such a thing, even if up until that point they've had nothing on you and you've passed your 3 month probationary period.
I think losing his job is the very least of his worries at this point. His reputation in that community is beyond repair. Whatever punishment he is going to endure - be it jail time, a large fine, probation etc - it needs to be done quickly and without error so he can move away. I have no idea if this qualifies as a sex crime or not - a crime that would land on you on a sex offender registry. I would hope not otherwise this guy will never live this down. He really should have denied everything - because based on the filed police report the employees had no idea who put the camera there until he fessed up.
Also - yeah…taping a mini-cam INSIDE of a urinal? Idiotic.
I'm posting this here because I just want to remind people that there are consequences for being stupid. This guy basically taped a camera to a urinal and recorded guys pissing - it was discovered - and for some bizarre reason Jeffery Larcade admitted that it was his camera. Perhaps he was caught removing it.
| "JULY 19–A government worker hid a camera inside a urinal and used the device to surreptitiously photograph and film coworkers, according to Louisiana cops.
The tiny camera, which had been duct taped to the urinal, was discovered by a Department of Planning, Zoning and Codes employee working in a Lafayette office. After removing the camera, the man discovered that its memory device contained images of several men, penises exposed, using the urinal, according to a Lafayette Police Department arrest affidavit.
A subsequent police investigation resulted in the arrest Friday of Jeffery Larcade, 38, who worked as a city planner for 13 years before his firing yesterday. Larcade, pictured in the mug shot at right, was charged with video voyeurism and booked into the county jail. He was released after posting $10,000 bond.
It is unclear how long the camera was in the urinal, or what was done with the photos and videos captured by the device. Though there is no evidence that the naked photos have been posted on the Internet.
Larcade admitted to cops and fellow workers that the camera was his, according to the arrest affidavit. (1 page)" | 
|
hxxp://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/camera-hidden-in-urinal-098345
Don't be foolish. I'm not saying don't be a voyeur - but don't get so comfortable that you're just leaving a camera taped to where people can see it.
EDIT: (2011-07-26 MrMazda) - Added picture from website (in table) to article using bitbucket
I think the only aspect of the spying that is questionable is the fact that you are related to this guy. I draw the line at spying on friends and family – it's just beyond my own level of comfort.
Also, word of advice, be careful because the taping can get VERY addictive. I dared myself to secretly tape an internet hookup encounter by hiding a camcorder in a laundry basket. After he left I watched the tape and was thrilled with the results. I ended up filming quite a few encounters this way. But that thrill carried over to filming guys showering and such in the bathroom. I had to make myself stop because I felt like I was pushing my luck and I would have been mortified if the camera was ever spotted.
Oh, and Lex -- yeah let's not encourage rape okay?
There have been "groups" created before by voyeurs – groups hosted by say Yahoo! or Google but for some reason they start off on the right foot but eventually die out. I think most moderators just get frustrated by the lack of participation or the lack of actual trading and abandon or delete the group.
I've met a few nice guys into the same stuff over the years. My usual method is that I will post a selection of spy videos to video hosting sites like Xtube or Gayforit etc with a message stating that I'm interested in doing private off-site trades. You do have to filter thru the bullshitters or leeches but once you meet a video trading buddy that is legit it gets real fun. I've learned a lot...to say the least lol.
I actually prefer the email/IM stuff to having an actual group location because groups tend to be a bit too open or obvious if you catch my drift. But yeah, like everyone has said -- keep in on the down low. Don't post your contact info in public forums.
I agree with everything Mr. Mazda has said and more.
I'm in the market for a new camera of the "covert" variety. My first priority is to move away from analog (VHS/Hi8/etc) and ignore digital devices that are clearly standard digital cameras, phones, and iphones.
When I was a bit more adventurous I used a pinhole/camcorder combination to capture all sorts of things without ever being detected. Not even necessarily things of a "sexual" nature. I just enjoyed recording people acting naturally in whatever situation. (Perhaps with the occasional dick/ass showing up.) The pinhole was powered by a 9 volt and connected to the recording device (camcorder) via RCA cable. There was a time when camcorders had Video-IN options. Crazy. I know. Today this seems downright prehistoric BUT one of the BIG benefits to this set up was that you could see what was being viewed by the pinhole with the camcorder doing the recording – from a distance. I considered it my own CCTV setup that would record whatever the pinhole could see.
But technology has changed so acceptable standards have changed. For example, I've downloaded countless older (80s, 90s) men's locker room spycam offerings. While often good -- these are clearly transfers from old VHS tapes that could not stand the test of time. They're often grainy with tracking issues. Though I must say I sit here and scratch my head because even with all these new options for covert filming there is rarely any "new" content shared.
I've been looking at this particular line of cameras (though perhaps not his specific one): hxxp://www.amazon.com/Worlds-Smallest-Resolution-Camcorder-Reader/dp/B002KA52SS
It seems to offer the clarity I'm looking for and it records audio (many don't). It stores data onto an SD card that can be read by a USB SD card reader (included). This is similar to what MrMazda was describing and likely the most ideal. I know of at least one Xtube user who swears by this style. It's also under 100 bucks if not cheaper than the link provided. The only drawback is it stores a max of only 8 gigs on a two hour built in battery and there's no way to know if you're really pointing it in the right direction. Hmmmph!
To get to the actual topic. As this is the forum to a gay torrent site we naturally talked about male on male voyerism here, what do you guys think of men who spy on women? Do the same rules apply there? Is it sort of OKish if noone can be recognized or it is just used for personal joy or is it a despicable act?
The most distinct difference between female/male vs male/male is that the all male voyeurism (being talked about here) can be done without breaking any laws. It is perfectly legal to join a gym and linger on occasion in the men's locker room. Granted you definitely want to do this type of viewing (spying) with discretion. This same can be said for certain restrooms. There's still plenty of piss troughs in older (or gay/fetish/leather) restrooms that allow for men to stand side by side with an easy view of each others cocks. For more explicit and outright sexual displays there are bathhouses. I've been to bathhouses a few times in my travels and it was never to actually get laid. It was specifically to walk around and check out all the horny dudes doing what comes naturally.
On the other hand, if a straight man wants to "peep" on women it has to be done in a way that is certainly frowned upon with the exception being mainly nude beaches/resorts. It's certainly been played for comedic in many films like Porky's. But I think most women would be horrified to find a man hiding in their locker room because it is clearly illegal for him to be there. The imbalance of "power" cannot be overlooked either. However, straight men have not hesitated to create websites that cater to their voyeuristic desires. Whenever I'm on the hunt for male voyeurism films outside of gay/male themed sites I am typically bombarded with female locker room/restroom/spy sex/upskirt offerings (that I ignore). I am not a straight man – I do not play by straight rules so my perception of this aspect of voyeurism has been conditioned by my society. (Straight) Peeping toms are generally believed to be socially inept perverts taking advantage of women.
Men who spy on men are almost NEVER talked about with the exception of cases like Dan Franco's. The reason Franco got in trouble was NOT because he was spying on guys in locker rooms but because he video taped his adventures (then sold them on the internet). Video taping is a different can of worms. (Some get off on it some find it offensive.)
I think the presumption is that most men in a private space are there for non-sexual reasons. And really…unless a guy is standing there jacking off while looking at you there's just no way of knowing he's visually molesting you. If somebody makes a veiled or outright accusation you can simply deny it and go about your business. Besides, straight men check each other out too.
Of course I'm biased in believing that men who get spied upon can handle being objectified. Mainly because I benefit from it happening. Be it in person or somebody captured in video form. There are probably better ways of expressing this point of view but ultimately I feel that same sex voyeurism is just different. There's no way it couldn't be.
His name is "Ian McQueen" and he's done videos for Raging Stallion, Club Inferno, Tim Tales and such. Mostly fetish stuff – he's a raunchy man and I love it.
I've been a bit obsessed with "Danny Harper" for quite a few years now. (A set of his pix are posted up thread.) But it all started when Danny was known as model "Graham" at Sean Cody. His hair was more noticeably red and his overall shtick was ginger jock-boy next door. He did four videos for SC: Graham, Jerk-Off Contest 6, Graham & Kenny, and Red Heads Fucking. However, he did wander over to Sharpshooters Studio for one video – "Naked College Nightclub" and went by the name "Morgan Arild" (wtf?). I love how his face holds just the right amount of snarl/hate-fuck. Sexy! Though I wish he weren't masking his ginger hotness.
I found this guy on Usenet ages ago – I'm sure that means zilch to some of you here. I immediately fell in lust. The fiery red hair, alabaster skin, bright pink dick, and the thick bubble-butt build had me swooning. Frankly I'll never know why this guy never became more than a low-list porn presence. He was so unique looking for the time. I've only ever seen him in a select few image sets and perhaps 2 or 3 porn scenes from video companies that never quite left a mark. He went by the name "Nathaniel" on at least one occasion. Oh well.
If anybody is interested in downloading two sets of ginger relic goodness have at it: hXXp://www.sendspace.com/file/izqd8r
I think comfort with nudity is cultural; including our sense of whether or not we measure up.
It's very much what you've said.
I grew up in the US and experienced the "typical" religious upbringing. That included suppression of sex/sexuality in all forms but also body shaming. I think it's one of the reasons why many children grow up with a warped perception about nudity – lacking the ability to disassociate nakedness from titillation. I distinctly remember the first time I was forced to get naked (for showering purposes) in Physical Education. (Yes there was a time when it wasn't optional.) My brain was instantly scrambled because I was excited about seeing my peers in the buff -- but I was also clothes free and up for scrutiny. (I am by all means a grower and not a show'er.) Ultimately the nightmarish thoughts about getting an erection in that moment ended any pleasure to be found. It was strictly eyes forward, scrub, rinse, immediately get dressed.
I've noticed other cultures throughout the world don't seem to have this "problem" with nudity. There are certainly nudist beaches or camps stateside but you have to seek them out -- and these types of organizations are largely frowned upon or mocked.
If you've ever watched any of the locker room footage of sports teams abroad (rugby teams etc) there seems to be no sense of shame. The location is crawling with reporters and cameras and there's almost a child-like joy these men exhibit when being nude together. Men of varied weight, height, age, and endowment -- all realizing they are displaying themselves for public consumption (on video even). Now contrast this with the horror and revulsion the American athletes exhibited when it was discovered their space was broadcast (Straight off the Mat). Of course these aren't identical situations but I'm wondering if the reaction would have been different if we (the US) didn't hide men's naked bodies away. (You're still hard pressed to find a penis on film if it's not porn.)
If there's one thing I love – it's a man with red hair. There's only one thing I love more and it's a husky/thick man with red hair. Dane from "Straight Fraternity" mostly fits that bill. (His solo video is still in the torrent list BTW.)
This is always a prickly subject to discuss. I've learned over the years that guys either find voyeuristic/spycam stuff hot or they find it reprehensible. (There's not a lot of grey area.) The dislike of this type of video is usually based on the notion that somebody is being viewed/filmed (for titillation purposes) without consent. While this is often true I still can't help but enjoy this style of smut. Clearly my desire to peep outweighs any moral or "legal" implications.
If somebody were to give me a choice between say an hour of candid locker room scenes with average blokes walking around in the nude or hardcore porn – I would always choose the locker room scenes. Because that's my version of fantasy fulfillment. My voyeuristic nature began as a kid wandering through community center locker rooms and seeing naked men. (This is pretty much what let me know that I was gay.) This nature has certainly followed me into adulthood. It's one of the reasons why if I spot a peephole in a restroom I'm going to take a quick look (if I can get away with it). It's also one of the reasons why I choose to collect the types of videos you would find at a pay site like "Spy On Guys". Which begs the question -- how does a site that offers legit hidden camera videos (and brags about it) stay in business? I think it's because the chances of somebody realizing they were in one of the videos is so slim that they take the risk.
I know that other torrent sites (one in particular) forbid that type of content though the occasional series sneaks through. Also, Xtube is now heavily policed for covert footage and they delete it almost instantly. Though other video sites don't seem to mind or care.
People do get in trouble when they get caught filming but it's usually for selling the videos. I'm sure most fans of voyeur flicks are familiar with the Franco "Straight off the Mat" locker room series (or Good Morning Marines). Well they got busted after somebody recognized themselves and their team mates in one of the videos.
This article goes further in to detail about the way it went down: hXXp://articles.chicagotribune.com/1999-04-04/sports/9904040218_1_wrestlers-tapes-camera
I find it odd that the authorities made such a stink but sites like Angry Young Man still offer videos like "Good Morning Marines" just under different names like "Pee Somu Hotto" (whatever that means). There's clearly a legal loophole somewhere that certain pay sites know about and it's used to their advantage.
Anyway, I'm starting to swerve. My main point is that I enjoy this particular sub-category of porn. (Though I'm not sure it all qualifies as pornography per se.) It can be considered controversial indeed. I liken this to the debate about bareback porn promoting unhealthy living. Many people are willing to watch others do something of a sexual nature that they personally would not. It's out there -- so why not give it a view...or two?
It's nice to have a forum to express thoughts and opinions on this subject. Though I will say I didn't even know this was here until a fellow voyeur pointed it out to me. I think once word gets around the posts will increase.
Those are from a series titled "Lookerroom" – they were originally posted in a now long gone Yahoo! Group that specialized in hidden camera/spycam material.
I have about 200+ images from the series zipped up and ready to download here: hXXp://www.sendspace.com/file/pn7dok
As a fan of the male ass there are a lot of nice buns to be seen -- mostly because a lot of the images were taken when the subject was facing away.
Enjoy!
no live links allowed in posts ~ leatherbear
Hmmm wasn't aware of the no live links rule – sorry. I guess you do learn something new every day.
