Posts made by Negrescence

@mhorndisk:

Don't you dare try to lie! I know the facts! Hillary took hundreds of millions of dollars from the funds for administrative costs. That's a GOD DAMN FACT. You cannot lie your way around that. SHE FACTUALLY DID. You wanna challenge me about it? You will LOSE. THE RECORDS ARE THERE. Don't you DARE try to tell me she didn't scam the people of Haiti! That's why the Haitian people were protesting outside her office in New York. Because she's a fucking god damn bitch who ripped them off and everyone knows it! Don't you dare try to pretend that she didn't.

The Clinton foundation only raised 30 million for their Haiti relief and it was a joined with the bush charity. Many supporters like you confuse this either with the charity USAID that used actual tax payer money and did some poor management. Bill did sit on a board governing other Haiti relief organizations but had no hand in the money. The Clinton foundation did secure pledges from private business interest that they would invest 500 million into rebuilding Haiti. The Clinton foundation doesn't touch this money and only observes the progress of these business pledges… The only questionable thing there was that her brother held a position in a mining company and stood to gain and the Clintons push for luxury hotels as construction jobs for ailing Haitians. I'm coming to think you're hopeless and are only here to spread disinformation.

@mhorndisk:

Are you ok with Hillary supporting such a racist woman as Margaret Sanger who promoted Eugenics, claiming that black people were weeds that need to be exterminated? Yes, or No.

The problem with this quote is that historians have never seen this before until it all of a sudden started popping up in memes on facebook. No one knows where this came from and there is no record or proof she ever said this. Historians are convinced she never did. The closest reference to this she ever made was one considering birth control, immigration, and non-assimilating foreigners/people.

Didn't include all the quotes.

"Birth Control does not mean contraception indiscriminately practised. It means the release and cultivation of the better elements in our society, and the gradual suppression, elimination and eventual extinction, of defective stocks–those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization."

Clearly  your quote was altered to great effect. One could easily take those references and put black people as the target since the language of those references can easily relate to racist views and beliefs towards black people. Literally replacing the subject in those references with black people would be the scripture of the kkk.

I sometimes wonder if Trump supporters ever had an idea about Hillary at all.... 
It seems to me that your thoughts is just someone else fevered opinions.

We went over this in another thread on how this was grossly untrue. Why does this stuff keep popping up? Before you post anything else up do us a favor and research your points and make sure they are sources based. This was all debunked a year ago and was sourced to one instance of a man making this up on the spot. It cost them an average of $2 out of every $100 to fund-raise and 88% of their money can be tracked to actually reaching their targets that they're supporting.

I know this is a ".ru" site but  chill out.

It seems so that Macron will win and I'm all for him, but we can't be certain just yet. This election is expecting an 80% participation rate which puts Macron as the likely winner. The US suffers in the arena since we can ever barely get a 50% participation rate. Republicans for decades have been gerrymandering and quelling votes. Look at a map of election results over the last 50 years and you'll find 13 red states that never change their vote whereas all blue states have voted republican before. It would be better to say blue states were voting for candidate whereas the red states were only for party. Technically District of Columbia has only voted blue but its not a state so I can omit it. If we could up participation rates in voting to 80% there would be know Trump. There is a reason republicans heavily support the electoral college over the popular vote. Look at a 3D election map of the US. on a 3D scale red districts are nearly invisible. This is a joke republicans have given a political reality because their are actually districts in the US with only a population of 40 and towns with a population of 1.

Child molesting priest do more charity than Trump but that doesn't excuse them from their sins. You can easily follow the stream of charity from other opponents. This poll again. Only 6% of money from the Clinton foundation served as overhead. The rest went to charity. You can literally look this up yourself. More so, most of the money pledged their was observed by the Clinton foundation, they didn't actually have any hands on this money. The Clinton Foundation often gathers financially-able entities and have them pledge monetary aid to a cause. The foundation doesn't touch the money or operations, they just observe to ensure the pledges are fulfilled. Clinton had to go out of her way to do this whereas Trump acted on a whim to do few deeds back-dropped by a blanket of greed and derision.

Obama nor Hillary said they were going to punish Britain. Obama said Britain would be at the back of the queue but retracted the statement after they actually voted for Brexit and said they would work with them. To say that the EU is a failure is to say the union of states or the United States is a failure. Should the blue state that account for 64% of the economy just leave just because red states are a burden based on raw GDP and taxes? There are commodities beyond raw GDP that a union of countries provide. The EU gives a financial status that allows these countries to stand financial above the US and to have relevant talking points. It provides them an ease of markets and financial markets across borders. It just goes on and on. Britain has already lost a lot of money from the initiation of Brexit and are slated to lose more money. They are expected to lose another 12% of their GDP from losing banks alone.  There are problems that need to be resolved but invoking solutions that are irreparable when we gather a modicum of sense later is not the way.

@raphjd:

Why didn't Hillary win when the mass media did everything hey could to ensure her victory?   CCN (Chris Cuomo and female co-host said it on air) and others have admitted this.

Hillary has a long, long history in the public eye.   Most of her "evils" have been well documented, such as her feminist lunatic comments.

I hated all 4 candidates for Presidents.  So I left that section blank on the election form.   Oddly, this somehow makes me a Trump supporter.

I think that is what sabotaged her, The certitude that she would win. Many of my friends never voted because it was inevitable she would win. They weren't all keen on her but would have voted for her over Trump in a heartbeat if they knew he actually had a chance. People were told Trump had a 3% chance of winning. Why bother going to the polls with numbers like that people thought. Many people also voted 3rd candidate and swapped votes with people in other states. This was a very peculiar election.

This isn't a singular actuating event. Trump, Police, and organizations choose happenings that support their platform while avoiding obvious follies. The police work within an official capacity cannot wade in and out of the public sphere like BLM can. Black crime and murder lingers on public opinion much longer than white crime. Montana is ranked as one of the top 5 most dangerous places and is nearly all white. No one would prelogically consider Montana dangerous and would be inclined to chose it over an affluent and crime black/Latino neighborhood. There are some sick and bizarre crimes that would leave you in awe, but they remain to local reporting oddly. Often you have to sift through police information just learn they actually happened. Basically, you have to look for this abundance of information whereas black/latino crime is thrust into the public sphere. This is also coupled with bigger cities having the capacity to cover events within its community whereas counties are nearly invisible. Perhaps since I serve in the military, I often lean or law on order but I can't help but notice they do have legitimate concerns statistically. Most of their concerns seems to reside with judges since sentencing is the lopsided reality they endure that cripples their lives but police do have some questionable proportion of law enforcement when you look at the numbers. Also, blacks have long since been the victims of police brutality before the civil rights era and were treated badly afterwards with the rise of the drug war and heightened poverty among their communities. Police are seen as the vanguards of civilization in all other communities whereas that is not so in black communities. I don't like this whole black community and white community nonsense since it gleans on segregation. Unfortunately it remains a reality. Mississppi last year received another desegregation order. This isn't surprising when you follow the tactics following white flight and realize  lot of these communities remain to resemble those communities from 40 years ago. This may pale a little far from BLM topic at hand, basically it's a s#@t show.

@aadam101:

This is America.  We don't follow what happens in the rest of the world.  I never heard of this.

Middle Americans and those who purport isolationism are usually willfully unaware of the outside world. Foreigners often find it shocking how little Americans know about the outside world and the US itself. A foreigner is more likely to understand the US better than an American. This has gotten so bad that schools are now teaching students how to pass an immigration exam since immigrants understand The basics of US government better than US citizens.

The whole THAAD thing is the Chinese trying to quell any possibility of deterrence to its claim to the waterways in the region. They see THAAD as a precursor to disrupting Chinese "Manifest Destiny". THAAD only shoots down medium range ballistic missiles and has become paramount with the increasing hostility of NK. You would think it would be an understood to place these kind of deterrents in place when your neighbor has lined your border with artillery. China will not directly stand against the US. The US and the Euro group are its primary trading partner and a weakening US economy weakens all other economies. Without those 2 groups China would fall into economic collapse. Obama devastated Russia economically with ease and with how unhinged Trump is, he could economically neuter China if they oppose him. They are trying to be careful but realize that The Euro group would have no  choice but to boycott China if Trump rails against them. With the rise of populism it isn't far fetched to think.

@raphjd:

@raphjd, 95-98% of what you say is wholly irrational…you know the rest.

So says the person that screams "racism" any time a white person disagrees with black people, regardless of the topic.

You are delusional if you think if the election went the other way that your side wouldn't be saying "yeah but what if Trump won?".   We heard that kind of stuff while Obama was in office about republicans who ran against him and even GWB, who couldn't be President again because of term limits.

You are a typical partisan hack.  It's ok when your side does it, but the other side is never allowed to do it.

It can be expected that this rhetorically conversely wouldn't have become so mainstream because their is little precedent of it. Hillary ruminates so heavily on Trump supporter minds because she was vilified and elevated to an infamy far beyond her character and reality. The things many trump supporters regurgitate that are untrue are manifold and persistent. The things are usually horrible beyond belief and yet forever taken for true and this is why she keeps coming up. Normally a modicum of research and exposure to sourced information remedies this, but Trump supporters are a "temporal anomaly". It would seem that bias has triumphed over the value of reason.

@mhorndisk:

What's crazy is the demoncrats banned the rebel flag because it has a history as "racist" when they founded the KKK. Why don't they ban themselves? Good grief!

By your logic we should just dissolve the US since we abolished slavery, an moral error we decided to correct. Are you saying that a group is not allowed to absolve itself of the poison of old-world dogma and ideology? The very ideology taken up by republicans when they abused the southern strategy, conducted white flight, artifically elevated housing cost in their neighborhoods to range just above african american affordability, the rise of "segregated" religious private schools. Last year Mississippi was issued another desegregation order. The reason many republicans think as they do today is because their communities continue to resemble the white flight communities of 40 years ago. When you live in a bubble and deem that to be your security, how can one reasonably expect these people to change? After 1970 there are 13 red states that have only ever voted republican whereas all blue states have varied based on candidate, not ideology.

@mhorndisk:

@Negrescence:

In 1989 Trump railed against 5 blacks teens for a rape in central park. In 2002 they were exonerated when DNA evidence and a confession proved they were not the assailants. Donald Trump refused to believe that these black thugs were not the criminals and continues accuse them of the crime. Donald Trump was fined by the casino commission for discrimination against women and african americans for pulling them from tables that mobster Libutti visited because he didn't like them as dealers.  Their are pictures and videos with Trump and his kids with this guy but he claims he doesn't no the guy…. Their is also a warrant on a few russian mobsters that have been money laundering froma room in Trump towers... Many staffers in his hotels complained about blacks being confined to back and out of sight during Trumps parties and visits because they were not classy enough. The last one is per testimony and their is no empirical proof for it, but you Trumpkins do not seem to need concrete sourced information to believe whatever you want so I included it, their many testimonies is more credible than most of the information you're inclined to believe.

Everything you just said is garbage and what pisses me off. No proof. Just conjecture. This is the reason you asshats hate him so much- fake crap that you wanna believe that isn't even remotely true. Gosh dang.

All you need but do is look up on google "Central Park Five" to see a personal interview conducted by Trump himself and follow the trail from there. What reality do you live in. You see something you don't like, conduct no research, and just flag it as false as if your disapproval enough constitutes reality.

How is this thread still a thing. We debunked the whole Haiti thing in previous posts. I personally explained in earlier post the whole haiti thing. You can google it yourself and be sure to seek sourced based information. Pne man made the whole haiti claim and it was found to have no bearing in reality. Hillary did at one time criticize black males and call them such. She, unlike Trump, apologized for her position. Trump was fined from the casino commission for discrimination when he removed women and blacks fro his tables because a mobster named Libutti didn't like them. Trump railed against 5 black and latino kinds for rape in 1989 that were later exonerated when dna test and a confession proved they were innocent. Trump continues to this day to accuse them of the crime despite evidence. Many staffers have testified that whenever Trump visited the towers they were usher to back during dinner parties because they were not classy enough. The list just keeps going on and on but Trump supporters do not care about questionable behavior unless it is a liberal. 90% of the things that Trumpkins despise about Hillary has been debunked or exaggerated.

In 1989 Trump railed against 5 blacks teens for a rape in central park. In 2002 they were exonerated when DNA evidence and a confession proved they were not the assailants. Donald Trump refused to believe that these black thugs were not the criminals and continues accuse them of the crime. Donald Trump was fined by the casino commission for discrimination against women and african americans for pulling them from tables that mobster Libutti visited because he didn't like them as dealers.  Their are pictures and videos with Trump and his kids with this guy but he claims he doesn't no the guy…. Their is also a warrant on a few russian mobsters that have been money laundering froma room in Trump towers... Many staffers in his hotels complained about blacks being confined to back and out of sight during Trumps parties and visits because they were not classy enough. The last one is per testimony and their is no empirical proof for it, but you Trumpkins do not seem to need concrete sourced information to believe whatever you want so I included it, their many testimonies is more credible than most of the information you're inclined to believe.

Seriously? The foundation rejected the klan and other klans out-right stated that they doubted he raised 20k at all. Their is no record other than the claim from Will Quigg. The other chapters outside of this particular California chapter endorsed Trump in their magazines and gave their money and endorsements to Trump and some to Cruz and have records for it. You can follow their money trail. Trump half-heartedly acquiesced to denounce them and everyone in the clan took it as seriously as Trump did, which is not at all. They're now putting up more open clan meetings since Trump. Their recruitment has increased and they have posters everywhere in their area of operation now. Their clan meetings are broadcasted outside of the meeting areas and are no longer secret. There are 130 klan groups and you found the 1 that unfoundedly financially endorsed Clinton whereas all the others openly stood behind Trump. Way to go.

This is the problem with Trump supporters. You hear anything that supports your biased agenda and hew to it without doing any research. First of all, the Clinton foundation made no commitment to build a hospital and Haiti, USAID, and the Clinton-Bush foundation have no record of any of this. This all started with Cohen making this comment that had nothing behind it to substantiate it. There was approximately 82 million from the us government that went through USAID for medical facilities, but this did not involve the Clinton foundation. There is also the 500 million "commitment to actions" pledge made to the Clinton foundation  to help Haiti. However, The Clinton foundation only tracks these commitments, it doesn't manage them or the money. There was some frustration about the priorities of the foundation there, such as employing Haitians there to build luxury hotels and and her brother's investment in a gold mining company, but nothing about a hospital or the foundation siphoning funds. Bill Clinton did co-chair on the Interim Haiti Recovery Commission that was charged with building the Port-au-Prince hospital that was delayed. Those are separate funds though and just a delay. The relief was not a total success obviously and left many frustrated, but that's poor management, not corruption. Clinton foundation and her brother did stand to make a lot of money from the mining company, housing development, and so on. Siphoning money from the fund however, would have hurt them and would have made no sense in the long run. The Clinton foundation has done a lot of good, far more than Donald Trump. It just remains to be seen if that good tags along some greed or just the foundations expansion to do more.

They never had a plan to replace it over the past 7 years. They didn't expect to win the election and didn't realize how many people supported ACA. I don't think they really cared, The dubbed the ACA as Obamacare to irritate constituents and thought they could just go back to people dying in the streets. It took Obama a year to produce the ACA and Republicans thought they could replace it on a whim.

@raphjd:

I don't understand why the left would rather defend illegals while at the same time demonizing/ridiculing those who went the legal route.   Sure, you'll find the occasional story about conservatives and a specific illegal, but the left loves all illegals.

The left ridicules legal immigrants? The problem I see is that those with a vested stance against illegals have an exaggerated opinion of the reality of these people. Fewer have been entering this country under the last administration and more have been leaving, Obama deported more illegals than the last presidents combined. Latino's call Obama the deporter-in-chief, but you will never hear that from republicans. an American is over 1126 times more likely to die to an American than an illegal immigrant.  Statistically, you are much safer among immigrants here than other Americans. It's not in their interest to get in trouble.They're not entitled to a lot of the social benefits many Trump supporter believe they're receiving. They contribute around enough in sales taxes to support a neutral to positive effect in the market. They take 3rd world jobs in the US that no american would take. Mexico is also our 3rd largest trading partner. Any unforeseen financial burden  from illegal immigrants falls pretty much on blue states if there are really any serious ones. Blue states make up 64% of economic activity and lose out in federal funding. They're donor states.  Illegal immigration is always a problem but it pails in comparison to bigger real issues in america. Each year as many Americans die to gun violence as those who die to ISIS. We (actually just red states pretty much) are ranking lower on the human development index when you rank them as countries against our western counterparts. It just seems silly building a wall to keep people out that are actually leaving more than they are entering and are here on overstayed visas or creating a travel ban against countries that haven't conducted a terror attack on US soil in 41 years… It's seems the people complaining the loudest about illegals are those who live in states least effected by them.

Admissions to sights such as stormfront and other supremacist sites increased tenfold with the rise of Trump. Their has been a rise of racial antagonism and the federal hate map has seen an increase in hate groups.  More hate groups are parading in the streets and holding more announced gatherings they otherwise would have been more discreet about. They have indeed been more embolden by Trumps rhetoric and their desire to "get their country back".

I too put tape over my camera's, but not so much to avoid my government that has laws against such surveillance. I do it because the US only has few direct allies. Every other country in the world and hacker is vying to access out computers.