Posts made by mhorndisk1

Well! Good thing for them spying on us on every corner because otherwise we'd never know that he faked it.

@fredfranco:

@mhorndisk1:

Why force the world to adopt your belief system? You're no God. Isn't that the same as the religions do? How are you different? Are you becoming that which you detest the most? The answer is resoundingly simple: yes. You've become that which you despise. Maybe focus more on making the gay community appear more accepting, as it claims to be, of inclusion and diversity - instead of exclusion of those who disagree, and have a right to do so. The gay community has become vicious and ruthless in general when it comes to the same crap they argue against.

There's no such thing as belief system. We're just looking for the quality of life that heterosexual people can have, and the only way of achieving that is fighting for our rights. We don't want to make them act and live as we believe, all we want is that they stop meddling in our lives. That's all!

Religious people are the ones who force the world to adopt their belief. We don't want to forbid anyone from working on Saturdays, we don't want to force any woman to wear a hijab, we don't knock on anyone's door asking for donation for our movement, we don't circumcise our children without their consent…

I agree with you on the exclusion within the gay community, though. Prejudice, too. Some even use race filters on online daters

No such thing as a belief system….? Yea there is. I don't see any republicans or conservatives around trying to steal away your life. That's a problem. Everyone acting like victims and losers is troubling. Stop that! Quit acting like you have it so hard. You have it better than most. People will think you're filthy, so what? Do you really care that much? Dignity? Get lost! Quit acting like you're superior to others. This is inverted. I went out to the gay bars tonight and nobody acted like a victim... Just sayin' it's ridiculous. You ain't no victim. In fact, you're the opposite. It's stupid to play this game.

Trump also never did anything to hurt you. He's been super nice to all people, especially gays who are most of his hotel managers. Quit acting like you have some kind of case. You don't. This will all come out, of the closet, when you're ready. Talk about dignity. You have to earn that. You aren't granted it, just because you're gay, or living, heads up. You have to earn respect in this world, and don't expect it just because you suck dick. Sorry.

You're not understanding the law, still. It has nothing to do with dignity. If you lick pussy or suck dick it doesn't matter, everyone does. Dignity is self-imposed, and we need a wall. Trump is right to demand a wall. 4K murders last year. Illegals. They suck more than us. They suck actually. Latin America was founded by Cortez like Alexandria, killing millions, Spanish. Acting like we're so terrible, no. We bought Texas, then there was the Lousiana Purchase. Then they acted like we're so imperial when we bought it. The Indians sent their criminals here. That's why so many Mexican and Latin words are SANSKRIT - like Chihuahua Desert. ShivaVa - Shiva's Temple. It's because Columbus confused us. They are literal Indian rejects, like Britainia to Australia. It's not True that illegals commit less murders, and even if that was the case, it's dumb.

If you have to jump over the fence, and can't go through the port, you probably have a criminal record to hide. Mexico is the second most dangerous nation in the world. That's why people want the damn wall. Cool, you want to come here to have a good life, go through the damn port, idiot. If you gotta jump over a fence, you probable have something to hide. It's so stupid that people don't get basic common sense. I will support Donald Trump and the Wall, because it's basic common sense that you don't let gangs through open borders who want to kill us like MS 13. How could you be that dumb? Oh, because the only thing you care about is making sure that you get gay marriage and making sure that a Christian has to bake your stupid cake. It's beyond retarded.

So Stockton is giving $500 to 139 residents as part of an experiment in Universal Basic Income. Basically, it's popularizing socialism to get democratic voters. In reality, we need to know where the money is coming from this one time, and where will it come from in the future.  It's other people's money. Nothing is free. I wonder how this experiment will work out? People will feel happy and vote for socialists running for president, like they did for the Obama phone. These people, unwilling to work (illegals have no reason to work much with all the benefits they get), will undoubtedly be using the money for food while they use their own money for drugs and booze (not all of them of course - and I'll bet they selectively chose those who would make the program look good). What a waste of money. Encouraging people to vote for democrats because they'll get free stuff. This is the problem with democracy and always why it's short lived: soon enough the people realize that they can vote the largess of the treasury into their own pocket. And how are they judging whether it was successful? Oh, the people feel good and stuff. Now they vote democrat so that's a success. What a crock of shite. California is literally the epitome of idiocracy. Giving people free needles for injecting drugs, too, keeping them dumbed down and in a state of perpetual servitude to the masters. This state is becoming a modern example of Venezuela and people like Gavin Newsom, are a total corrupt shame.

I get what you're saying, and obviously there is a lot of that, "I'm better than you stuff," going around - in fact everyone has an ego and does that, not just Christians or Muslims or whatever religion. It's a very fine line, and also a gray line, and honestly, the law will never be able to stop people from having egos, that's not it's purpose. The law is set up to protect people's rights. So you can argue that they are treating you unequally, and they can argue that their religion sees it as wrong, so they don't have to support it. Who's right and who's wrong is in the eye of the beholder. Now obviously being gay, I think they are wrong, and really it's a difficult debate, but you're not going to win the war by force. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink.

The answer, I think, is more along the lines of taking your business elsewhere, and twofold, treating them with respect to their beliefs, as you wish to be treated. The Law of the Water (Commerce) works on transactions. You cannot order people to do things, that's dictatorship, and it goes against civil law because it's uncivilized - it's in fact, fascist, and against the very nature of commercial law. The Constitution basically doesn't even exist anymore in the courts, it's all Commercial Code. If you hold a gun to my head and order me to mop your floor, I'll do it, but I'll send you a bill you won't like. I don't like this forcing people to accept your view (stooping to their level in a way), no matter how right you may think you are. It's the wrong path and it leads to vengeance and will only hurt your cause in the long run, and it will come back. This is the liberal pathogen - always more concerned with telling people how to live their lives rather than just living your own. Learn some patience. You already have so many victories and now you're concerned that someone doesn't want to bake your cake? If I owned a business I wouldn't bake your cake because I don't agree with you forcing me to perform a service for you, so what's to stop them from doing the same and just changing the tactic? You need to focus more on promoting businesses that support you, not those that don't. Why would you give them money if they hate you? It's counter-intuitive. Then they take that money to spend on causes you don't support. How stupid is that? All the gays celebrating, "Yay! We forced them to accept our view!" That's not a win. In the long term that makes them hate you more now than in the past, and strengthens their determination to fight you.

You don't have a right not to be offended. People are offended by "it's ok to be white." If you are offended, it doesn't mean you are being treated unequally, automatically. If you are offended that the government doesn't refer to you as a Ze, or your babies as theybies… who cares? I don't. You can call your babies whatever you want. Why force the world to adopt your belief system? You're no God. Isn't that the same as the religions do? How are you different? Are you becoming that which you detest the most? The answer is resoundingly simple: yes. You've become that which you despise. Maybe focus more on making the gay community appear more accepting, as it claims to be, of inclusion and diversity - instead of exclusion of those who disagree, and have a right to do so. The gay community has become vicious and ruthless in general when it comes to the same crap they argue against. It's the wrong path, and it's beyond hypocritical.

I'm not trying to prove that being trans is a choice. Sex reassignment is a new thing, so not natural, but being trans internally is a personal thing. And also if someone wants to cut off whatever, it is their choice. I have a difficult time when sexuality and gender are merged into LGB-T, because they are different, and we have a problem with mis-identification, but it's all about identity politics so people stretch what they can get away with. And I don't have anything against Transgender people, one of my best friends was Trans before I moved, and she was a fun, positive person who I love and miss. Some people are nudists for instance. Some people want to cover up even when alone. People feel all sorts of different ways, and much of that has to do with society and external, but a lot is internal. You were trying to make some case about it, so I expressed my feelings about it.

As far as common law goes, there really isn't a solid definition, there are many types. But you could always go to a church that accepted you and marry - as long as you kept the government out - which was my point. You wanting the government's approval shouldn't be a thing, because they only want control over it. I was raised to not necessarily care what other people think or to seek other's approval. And much of this is obviously that, which is why if you go to a Muslim bakery and ask them to bake your cake, they'll tell you "no way, get lost," but gay people don't seem to care. It's hypocrisy and fascist to force a baker to break his freedom of religion. If they don't want to bake your cake, go somewhere else (because they'll spit in it anyway). It's about forcing people to accept your religious beliefs and violating theirs and that is criminal because you are violating their rights. You can't force people and I don't support that in any manner.

Legalese sounds like English, but it's not. The words mean very different things. For instance the word "includes." Most people believe it means "also," but in fact it means "only," in many cases and you've got to be careful therefore with every single word. This is how people are conned all day long - by mere words. In regard to Christianity especially, but in the other Abrahamic faiths as well, the best form of government to them is always a Monarchy - because that's how the Kingdom of Heaven works. They'll always be at odds with the Republic, and this is why I prefer Buddhism (even though it is considered a non-theistic religion of sorts).

You are talking about laws obliging the marriage of gays, and what I'm saying is that the highest law in this land is Freedom of Religion and there should be no laws infringing it and thusly, no laws regarding it whatsoever. The government can only intervene when it has to do with a couple where one party doesn't consent, like a minor who can't, or goats, or whatever. The law is very different from legalese. Everything is different from Drive to Operate, from Person to People, Freedom and Liberty, Legal and Lawful (too totally different words) and this is why corporations are persons under the law because a body is a corpse (CORPS/Corporate). One is flesh and blood, the other is paper and fiction. The government does not control the flesh and blood, they only control the corporate fiction, because the Law of the Land puts the people as above the government. By creating the personhood scheme the government has managed to get all of us as their subjects rather than them as ours. And person means an actor or mask - pretend (Persona). Deep stuff I don't want to get into because it's not too relevant.

My point is, people should be demanding that the government has no say in marriage, gay or straight (not that I'm against gay or straight marriage). I'm against legal marriage. Legal refers to the Law of the Water (Commerce - corporate law/ Persons), and Lawful to the Law of the Land (People) (Article III).

First of all, being gay is not a choice, and transgender is. You may feel one way or another, but when you have a biological male competing against women and of course winning in a sports competition - it sets a precedent of unfairness which is obvious - and if you're for fairness, than that's not a winning path. Also, LGB is about sexuality, and T is about gender. They are not the same and I view transgender as a mutilation, like many other gays. Sex reassignment surgery is a new phenomena and not a natural thing. I also think the laws can be exploited to allow a man to put on a wig and some lipstick and fake boobs and perv on the ladies - which they are not happy about. Just my opinion.

Gays have always had the right to marry under common law - under their God, the difference in a legal marriage is that the judge is God. You don't understand the difference between legal and lawful, but most don't. You are popularizing the idea of trading rights for privileges and that sets a very dangerous precedent against our God given inalienable rights. Freedom of religion by it's very fundamental idea means the government has no say in it, so for you to get the government involved is only bringing more bureaucracy to the institution and complicating things. You are giving the government that you claim persecutes you even more power over your life, period. They should stay out of it entirely, because of the First Amendment - religious freedom. What happened to separation of church and state? You don't like religion and state in a Christian nation, so why are you all of a sudden for it when it suits you? Now you're giving up your freedom of religion, though you don't realize it because you don't understand what a license is.

You can have a license to practice law or medicine, to smoke medicinal marijuana, to hunt wild game and fish, to drive, etc. By it's very meaning, you are not understanding that a license can only be granted to do things that are already lawful to do. You cannot get a license to rape, murder, or steal. You are thereby begging for permission (the legal definition of apply, for a license in this case), begging for permission to do that which you already have the lawful right to do. Why would you ask for permission if you can already do it? Because you are being tricked into trading your rights for privileges and actually turning the idea of freedom upside down on it's head, unwittingly. The government only cares about one thing, power, because "govern" means control, and "ment" is Latin for mind. Words are very important and what may sound nice and wonderful is how the devil always works his contracts. Be careful what you wish for.

Semitic means Arab. Because it refers to the languages Phoenician, Hebrew, Aramaic, and Arabic.

Phoenician is a dead language.

Aramaic is spoken by only a few Syrians.

Hebrew is not spoke by modern Jews - they speak Yiddish and several other languages.

Arabic is the only group left that Semitic refers to.

This has to do with a mistranslation. Anti-Semitic means someone who is bigoted against someone who speaks a certain language, and literally nothing to do with Jews. Yet they have leveled this Anti-Semitism against Arabs, who are the majority Semites, to anyone who disagrees with Israel or it's policies. It's absurd. There is a difference between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Zionist. But if you dare speak against Israel then you're an Anti-Semite. It's sick, but it's the world we live in.

Well Brazil is different, but conservatives are not after gay rights. Donald Trump has never tried to do anything to hurt gay rights. He's never went against gays in any way, and several of his managers at his casinos and hotels are gay. Transgender is about gender and LGB is about sexuality. They are different. You are born gay, you aren't born trans. Yesterday a feminist expressed her outrage on Tucker because Trans are usurping their sports and other things. I'm not against Trans, one of my best friends is Trans, but it has nothing to do with sexuality, and to lump them in is a stretch.

You aren't understanding the law as it is written, and though you are from Brazil, the law is the Uniform Commercial Code, a law that is universal by Vatican prefect. Van Koten VS Van Koten expressed that even though the Defense of Marriage Act states that a marriage is between a man and a woman, the SCOTUS ruled that it is actually between two persons and the government (a three party system). Problem is, government gets to decide everything and is the overruling party to the marriage because you asked them for permission to invoke your privileges. Privileges are not rights - in fact license to marry - a license means to beg for permission to do something already lawful. We shouldn't be asking permission to do what is lawful unless we are totally ignorant and needing of being placed in the ward of courts.

Conservatives are not trying to take your rights, and they never will at this point, because it cannot be challenged in court again unless YOU bring it. Then it's your fault, because you have everything you wanted and there's no reason. What about trying to marry in a Muslim Temple? Why don't you try to do that and see how far your rights go? It's hypocritical because the only people not following the law are the Islamic Citizens who refuse to follow the law as it is written. The left believe they are like Aladdin and Disney, and then attack conservatives who couldn't care less. Look at Europe, and even NY now they have their own Islamic Police patrolling and Sharia is being enacted. It's a shame that they are attempting to usurp the law because ultimately that will only lead to end gay marriage but you aren't concerned about that because you are ok with the hypocrisy.

The point is, as it was said, we vote Republican because we hate ourselves. No. You vote democrat because you can't be happy with what you have. It isn't about settling. You already have all the rights you could ever want. And you're pretending that you have a mission against the conservatives and that you're some kind of victim when you absolutely are not. You have it better than you ever have in history and you're acting like an ingrateful person towards what you have. That's obvious. You're hypothesis and theory that they would ban gay bars is beyond ludicrous. Most of them don't even believe in their own religion for starters. They don't know what to believe. It isn't because of liberalism, it's because that's the way nature is and they recognize it. You are weaving a hypothetical theory that doesn't make sense.

I know this is News to you, because CNN won't report the ACTUAL FACTUAL News.

It was officially announced today, that Trump was right the whole entire time - this was a witch hunt, and the investigations are over - there was NO evidence of collusion with Trump and Russia (ZERO). There. All you haters who've been trying so hard to press this issue - like we said, with no evidence for the last two years - have been doing so because of beliefs and not facts - because you just wanted to believe it, and you thought you could manipulate the people into accepting it to make it true (shame on you). It was what you wanted to believe. But now, it's over, it's done. You lost again, bigly. Thanks for wasting millions of our tax dollars because of your wannabe beliefs!

Now Devin Nunes (R) is announcing investigations into the obvious collusion with Democrats and Russia, such as Hillary and Mueller and Uranium One - which is on the record and already proven - they colluded with Russia period. Trump did not interfere with your little investigation as you had wished he did to make some case about obstruction, and he is vindicated. All these new investigations into his taxes he will allow because there is nothing there. We should get to see Maxine and Pelosi's tax returns too, because how do Congresspeople become millionaires on a 200K salary? The corruption on the left is overwhelming and it's going to bring them down and Trump will win in 2020 like we said over and over again, but you kept claiming Trump would go to jail and be found guilty. Looks like you were 100% wrong, like I said, and so many of us have said, again and again. When will you learn to Trust me? I'm right and I know what I'm talking about!

How can you Trust the media now? They are total fake news - they made you believe there was something that wasn't there. They're losers.

@furio111:

Masters of these "liberals" always talk about "greed" and "hate".
And by invoking these emotions in their subjects they stop their thinking processes to keep them on the plantation.

They aren't just flipping on the gay issue, which 10 years ago they were against until it became politically convenient. Now they're flipping on the wall. They all supported it, now they're against it because they would rather Trump lose than secure America. It has nothing to do with greed or hate on the part of conservatives. It has to do with Democrats wanting voters, and cheap labor for their lobbyists - everyone knows that. There is a reason America is the largest prison in the world by far, and that's because States pay the privately owned jailers tax money in the billions, and they lock up as many as they can. Trump just reformed the system to a degree, so that victimless crimes are called out for what they are (it's unconstitutional to lock them up if there was no victim) - some have been released. The democrats flip on everything, unless it makes them money. Not to say that the Republicans aren't involved in it as well. They have known damn well for a long time, and Trump is making them acknowledge it. It's time to legalize weed and mushrooms now - victimless crimes are not crimes.

@furio111:

If politics is about self-government.
And in order to be able govern people should be informed.
Then you have to have open debate.

And since groups are able to wield power over individuals.
It is important to have open debate about any group.

–-

So if as a group some people produce let's say unemployment, crime and government dependence or even wars in The Middle East.
Then you should call it like it is.
If the criticism is heard and there is no change/reasonable response.
Then it is valid to assume that every individual in the group is "x".

I don't know that I'd say it's valid to assume every individual in the group is x, but most for sure. Even Trump was careful not to do that regarding illegal Mexicans. But the Truth is, Mexico is the second most dangerous country in the world, and if you have to jump over the fence, or can't go through the port of entry, than chances are it's because you can't get through the port - because you have a criminal record to hide - and the statistics show that this is True.

It is important to have open debate about any group - accept Jews, that is a no no, as the Muslim Congresswomen was forced to apologize by her own party - the Dems. You don't question the Jews - anyone else is up for grabs. If you even question the Jews you get called Anti-Semitic (a special class of racism that's above the word racist because it's different). This is because there is a large number of Christian Zionists in America, which is strange because Jews reject Jesus outright. Some of them like Sarah Silverman outright say things like "If he came back, I'd kill him again!" God rejected the Jews too, before Jesus came, but most Christians have never even read the Bible, and we send billions to Israel every year because of Islam.

Well mgr, I'll tell you that regardless of statistics, it's very obvious that in the United States, and what I've seen in Europe to a certain degree (no percentage can be truly established and thus polls are always relative - even though some polls admit they sample more democrats and people don't read that fine print) that the left plays identity politics all day long and that's how they manipulate people. All day long the left here is screaming about social justice and talking about how bad women and gays and blacks and hispanics and everybody who's a minority voice is being raped - when they've never had it better. Both sides play the cult of personality and go by what sounds good coming out of their mouths - that's politics. Just look at how many good looking young men win - Obama, Macron vs le Pen, Trudeau, Nieto in Mexico, Guaido in Venezuela. It's a certain charm that seems to win on the liberal side a lot, but not always. Cult of personality isn't always about charm - in Trump's case - it's realness and speaking to people in the language they speak (pissed off - like me - pissed off that I'm having to pay $1,000 a year for Obamacare) rather than talking like a politician who nobody trusts (Drain the swamp - we all know it's beyond corrupt and Congress approval is at like 14%). They like realness and they trust it, but he's also delivered bigly.

There are some gays who hate themselves. I don't hate myself, but I lean Republican because I don't like Democrats pandering to me, flip-flopping on gay marriage because it's politically convenient, speaking to me as though I'm a victim when I'm not (patronizing) - which tells me they're fake, and stereotyping me into the same groups as Muslims who want to murder us (to make their power seem larger), perpetuating the victimhood mentality as though we are all united as losers and rape victims. These people do not care about us, they only care about power. They put on a good act, that's all, but I'm not falling for it.

And the Democrats are promoting Socialism, which is insane. The problem with many in the gay community is that they are focused on one issue (the gay issue). Unfortunately there are many more important things, and to think otherwise is selfish in my opinion. Mexico is one of the most dangerous countries in the world, and that's why people want a wall. What's more important to me? Sure, a lot of Conservatives may call us fags, so why do we let that have power over us? And we have it better here (under Republican control) than any place in the world - we take it for granted how good we have it - other places the "Establishment Right Wing" throw you off a building.

I'm more concerned about MS-13 and gangs that murder people coming across the border than I am in having Republicans "like" me. Latin America is very homophobic, they cut off your head there. I don't care if people "like me" or not. There's always going to be people who don't like you. That's life, get over it. Life isn't a popularity contest like social media has you addicted to believing. Gays who vote Republican don't do so because they "hate themselves." They just don't see themselves as the most important thing in the world like some kind of royalty. You can go out to the gay bar and have a good time, get a boyfriend, have a good life, and get married just like anyone else can. It seems like given all that, Liberals still aren't satisfied. The Conservatives leave you alone and let you live your life, and yet, you still aren't happy.

Are you referring to stereotyping? The left (MOST of them) say all conservatives are deplorable, racist, sexist, homophobic, misogynist, zealots, on a nonstop daily basis. So the right says that they're liars (there are in fact, black and gay and women and trans and non-Christians, and Mexicans, and legal immigrants who support the right). And then the left defends Hillary after she deleted 33,000 emails, bleach bitted her servers, and then hammered them to pieces - after a subpoena (blatant obstruction of justice). There is also proof that she sold uranium to Russia, and yet the left (MOST of them) claim that Trump colluded with Russia, but have no factual evidence, just accusations. It's amazing how the left can go along with this narrative. I don't really see anyone on the right stereotyping the left - although they do call them names like libtard, but that's not a stereotype, it's saying "piss off, you don't know me." Like if I call someone a bitch, it doesn't mean I hate women, it just means that that particular woman is being vicious and malicious. Just my honest opinion. Can you give me examples of the right stereotyping the left?

Says it was a matter of "Black Pride."

https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2019/02/joe-biden-segregation.html

Funny because I just heard he was in the lead for Democratic Presidential hopefuls…

@bobcat666:

Does anyone struggle as a gay young republican?   Even my straight friends act baffled that I would call myself republican even if 90% of my views align with their simply because some of them don't like gays.   So because of that I'm apparently supposed to vote for everything I hate?  It's been frustrating. I want to meet more republican gays under 30 but there arent many.  At the log house republican christmas party i was the only one there under 40.

I like Trump, (and I am waiting to see if he will deliver), but I don't like Democrats or Republicans. I can't hate Republicans for their anti-gay stance, because it's the religious institutions that have brainwashed them. But I also can't support them because it affects their policy and clouds their agenda with darkness - atleast I know where they stand. Democrats on the other hand, pretend like they support gays, but like Raphjd said, they only support gays when it is politically convenient. After DOMA was passed, I never trusted them, and the constant trying to get me to believe, "you're a victim, so vote for us," is bullcrap. They don't speak for me. I am looking at Howard Schultz (Former Starbucks CEO possibly running as Independent) to see where he stands.

And now after backtracking his apology, and saying it wasn't him, yet another picture in the same yearbook reveals him wearing the exact same pants as the guy in blackface (he was hoping no one would look at the pants and instead the face). And CNN doubles down, labeling him a Republican again! This after a long campaign labeling his Republican competitor multiple times as a "racist," with no proof. Now liberals are saying they actually think the photo is of Trump. It's pure insanity.

I've thought for a long time that CNN actually works for Trump. I mean, saying he removed the MLK bust… they knew that was fake and they knew they'd be caught. There are hundreds of examples of this.

Now Democratic Governor Northam, who yesterday promoted POST BIRTH ABORTIONS - after receiving 2 MILLION dollars from Planned Parenthood - our tax dollars, has appeared in black face/KKK hood in medical school yearbooks from 1984. Interesting, because...

CNN put an (R) next to his name, rather than (D) which is what he actually is, while talking about this. I really think CNN is working for Trump, because you can't be that fake without supporting the President.

It is rumored that Ruth Bader Ginsburg is in an induced medical coma to keep her alive. She's been missing for a month and a half. They say she is working while in recovery. Nobody has seen her or heard from her. Soon President Trump may have to appoint a new Supreme Court nominee. Someone who claims to be close to her snapped a photo of her in the coma and posted it, saying they were at an undisclosed location and then asked for help because people were onto her. It will be interesting to see if she shows up at the State of the Union in four days. I don't think she will.

Recently the Colorado Legislature passed a bill to abolish the Electoral College (I'm tying this in because it's a Constitutional issue tying to the Supreme Court), the 11th state to do so. This is interesting, because sometimes the Republican candidate wins the popular vote, and these states doing this are democratic. It basically means that we are going full democracy. Democracy is mob rule, it is 33 whites hanging one black. It is the absolute worst form of government imaginable, because eventually the people recognize that they can vote the largess of the treasury into their own pocket, and Alexandria Occasia Cortez is promoting just that. My taxes this year are still for over a grand to fund the Mandate of Obamacare. The Supreme Court will have a say here in the end.

Also 3 states have recently passed (as far as I'm aware) late term abortions, and Virginia's Governor yesterday made a statement about Infanticide, stating that the mother and doctor can even decide to kill the child after birth if it's not "viable," in their opinion. Interesting that today, the next day, he is being asked to resign by the Democratic Party en masse, as photos of his yearbook show him in a picture - the picture is of a KKK member and someone in black face. He apologized but does not state whether he was the one in black face or the one in the KKK outfit. Just more evidence that the Democratic Party and Liberals are totally the racist ones, and one of the former nominees for the DNC Spokesperson went on Fox News today stating that they have a big problem with racism in their own party. Republicans don't do this - and there are things I don't like about the Republican party, but speaking of Virginia Governor Northam's campaign, he made it totally about how racist his opponent was, and that's why he won - identity politics and fraud. This casts a horrible reminder of how the DNC operates. They are the most filthy organization to exist on this planet.

I don't wish death or ill will on RBG, I just think she's done, and it's the Dims that are going to bring Roe V Wade back into the SCOTUS because of this pushing for the extreme (post birth abortion and infanticide) - not the Republicans, and when they do, this time it won't be in their favor. It's time for Trump to nominate a new SCOTUS nominee and end this Unconstitutional Abolition of the Electoral College that guarantees a Republican form of government over mob rule, and to end this "it's my body," crap.

It's not your body bitch. It has a different DNA, it has it's own brain - and that is not your body. A murder of a pregnant woman is a double homicide. I'm not religious, but I know it's disgusting. Close your legs whores, because the time of irresponsibility and murder is over. I'm all for "It's my body" when it comes to sovereignty or smoking weed - though I don't smoke weed. But it's not your body, it's a body inside your body, it's connected through the nave, but it's not you. Yes you have reproductive rights, and I also have the right to take a shit, Digestive Rights. It's called breathing. It doesn't mean you can take it to the extreme.

@raphjd:

9 Turkish muslims did a planned acid attack on gays outside a gay club in Hackney in London, in Novemeber 2018.

CCTV shows it was planned as they waited for fags to leave the club before getting out of their cars.

The media coverage of this incident has gotten almost no MSM coverage.

We have to wonder why that is.  We know when muslims are the victims, the global media reports on it, even when it turns out to be fake.

My conclusion is; fag victims don't matter if it makes muslims look bad.

Back to the discussion - Muslims will kill you, whereas fags may have a drag queen throw their shoe at you. It's astounding to me that gays will jump along the Linda Sarsour bandcamp and support Islamic refugees just because it goes against Trump - who never did anything bad to gays. It was Clinton who passed Defense of Marriage Act. Now because it's politically convenient, the democrats are pro-gay. The GOP thinks Transexuals are weird, and I'm not a Republican, but I don't think they're morally evil or nefarious because of it. It's not natural because surgery to do that kind of thing is something we only started doing just a few decades ago. I'm not going to hate the Republicans for not accepting trans people. Gays are a different story, and on a case by case basis. Do they hate gays or are they brainwashed and a victim themself? If it's the latter, it's the institution that should be villainized, because attacking them for being indoctrinated is going to make them hate you because they won't understand - then it's your fault.