Posts made by mhorndisk

What?! You just can't accept that by hiding basic info that they already have access to was just a carrot on a stick to get them to dig themselves deeper into a hole.

You really think that Trump didn't dupe you into admitting guilt? Wow. Man you guys have so much to learn. He got them to admit they were engaged in fraud, just by pressing a button. It's so pathetic!

I mean seriously! All he did was Tweet, and now they are all scrambling like HELL NO! You won't DARE look at our voting records! We have NOTHING to hide! LOL. That's beyond absurd.

Trump can make those claims, that your state is engaged in fraud, because he KNOWS. Now he has gotten them to ADMIT it "unwittingly," AND without having to come out and actually ACCUSE them outright.

He got them to ADMIT it openly without having to be the bad guy. It's GENIUS!!!

"Hey DHS, it's ME! A liberal! I just want you to know that I don't support BLM OR ANTIFA!"

LOL You guys are in TROUBLE

Hello!!! 13 BILLION for Haiti. Only 1% actually went there. Is there something wrong with your head?  :cheesy2:

The main point that seems to be lost in these distracting points from the main point of the post: if they don't want to cooperate and just help the federal government make it easy and find out if there's vote fraud… there's vote fraud for sure. Who can really deny it? All I've heard is you guys sitting here making excuses as to why it shouldn't be a national issue. It is a national issue, and Trump's administration has exposed it and will continue doing so. If you don't want your voting records investigated, you have something to hide.

@flozen:

@mhorndisk:

Youtube Video

5 Minutes. Funny. Laughable. Insane waste of money. 22 people to dress Michelle Obama.

If it is indeed, true, that Michelle's / Melania's "staff" has been reduced by a ratio of 24 (or 22) to five, it has little to do with Michelle's personal styling, and more to the fact that Melania's off to a really slow start – or more accurately, no start and no visible staff -- in the traditional areas of "causes" taken on by FLOTUSes -- in her case, the unbelievably ironic "cyberbullying."  From last week...

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/06/29/reminder-melania-trump-pledged-create-anti-cyberbulling-campaign/439247001/ , as excerpted:

"Days before the 2016 election, Melania Trump said in a speech that she intended to fight cyberbullying if her husband was elected.
But in the months since then, the first lady has not yet publicly made any efforts to do so. Back in May, USA TODAY reported that the effort was, per Trump's office, a work in progress.

"Stephanie Grisham, the first lady's spokeswoman, confirmed Thursday that Trump was 'continuing to be thoughtful about her platform.'"

Thoughtful…!?!  I mean, we are 164 days into this administration -- one that is, of more importance, riddled with unfilled ambassadorships and vital government posts (just ask ol' slow-hand Tillerson).  So, perhaps Mel is just taking her cues from the inner circle.

Thinking back, I wonder how many stylists it took to prep Melania during the 10 identified instances she illegally accepted payment as a model in the U.S., before getting her working papers?

https://apnews.com/37dc7aef0ce44077930b7436be7bfd0d  "Melania Trump modeled in US prior to getting work visa"

For that matter, how many PR hacks and failed reporters were employed to write Melania's now-infamous speech at the Republican National Convention, with key passages plagiarized from… wait for it, wait for it... Michelle Obama...?

https://news.vice.com/article/donald-trump-campaign-admits-melania-trump-speech-plagiarized-michelle-obama

Did that wild-eyed YouTube cackler ever intelligently address any of these Melania-specific issues from the comfort of that fuzzy sofa?  And congrats to Mrs. Trump, with her small staff – and to date, her exquisitely small contributions -- as FLOTUS.

flozen you're just a hater. What did Melania do to deserve such hatred? She expressed that she wants to do something, but the world is complicated. It's not as simple as slapping some butter on a piece of bread. I can't believe you are attacking her. She's done way more than you ever could have. Show me your website. You are such a hypocrite. You are throwing stones against someone when you have no foundation to even begin to stand on. What a pathetic string of words coming out of your mouth… You actually dare attack someone when you have less to be proud of? That's obscene. You should be ashamed of yourself.

It's a simple question. Did she step down because the DNC was hacked, because Seth Rich leaked the info, or because the CONTENT of the emails PROVED they were tricksters acting fraudulently? This is something liberals HATE, because they know the REAL answer. She didn't step down because she was hacked. She didn't step down because Seth leaked the emails to WikiLeaks. She stepped down because the CONTENT of the leaks PROVED she was a liar and a fraud. Plain and simple. But I'd like to see if you disagree. I'm tired of people using Russia as a deflection from the content of the emails, which proved they are fraudsters.

Ok, I'm still waiting. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz stepped down not because the Russians hacked her. Not because Seth Rich exposed the emails. But BECAUSE she KNEW that the exposed emails PROVED their FRAUD. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it. You want to sit there and continue blaming Russia, but you NEVER admit that Debbie stepped down BECAUSE of the CONTENT, where they LITERALLY committed FRAUD. You don't get it. It doesn't matter if someone hacked us. What matters is what they EXPOSED. You still refuse to answer that. It's a deflection of the worst degree and magnitude. You will not, and cannot ADMIT that what was revealed, regardless of who hacked them, was fraud. That's why you lost the election. And that's why you will lose in 2020. That's why you've lost all the special elections since. Because it doesn't matter that you were hacked or exposed, what matters is that the CONTENT of the exposure PROVED your beloved liars were corrupt and fraudulent, and that's why we say LOCK HER UP!

Hey! It's me! God! Just believe me! And if you have questions I'll be in Heaven.

Wow. What's missing from that report is WHO wrote it. Who was the AUTHOR? If you don't have someone to counter-question, it's useless. They are vaguely making a masked and cowardly report, and it's also an OLD report. You can't just make blanket statements and accusations and expect that everyone JUST BELIEVE YOU. That's been your problem from the start. That's why you admitted that the narrative was wrong, that 17 agencies didn't say what you said they did. Without the ability to question the author, it's just as fake as fake news, ANONYMOUS. It has no relevance if the person making "factual statements," can't be questioned, and I do not Trust the intelligence community. They have already been caught in too many lies.

Oh wow a liberal doing the fat shaming thing. Shocker. It's ok when it's a conservative that you're talking about.

Uh, yea we punch. Right in the PUSSY!!!

Oh. Cackling you say? She must be a witch! Let's burn her at the stake then!

NO, it doesn't. Did you not read the report? Here's the part you missed (the last part).

Even after the correction, the Times quickly returned to its pattern of deceiving its readers regarding the U.S. intelligence assessment. On June 30, a Times article reported: “Mr. Trump has repeatedly cast doubt on the unanimous conclusion of United States intelligence agencies that Russia sought to interfere in the 2016 race.”
The phrasing “unanimous conclusion” again suggests that all 17 intelligence agencies are in accord, albeit without specifically saying so, a journalistic sleight of hand that raises further doubts about the objectivity and honesty of the Times on this issue.
The Times’ belated correction — and its new deceptive formulation — underscore the growing sense that the U.S. mainstream media has joined in a political vendetta against Trump and has cast aside professional standards to the point of repeating false claims designed to denigrate him.
That, in turn, plays into Trump’s Twitter complaints that he and his administration are the targets of a “witch hunt” led by the “fake news” media, a grievance that appears to be energizing his supporters and could discredit whatever ongoing investigations eventually conclude.

Youtube Video

I did get a creepy vibe from Huckabee in 2008, but I was wrong. His daughter is amazing. How dare they attack her!

Have no fear! Trump is here! I'm glad to hear you say CNN is over-reacting and be critical of your favorite liar network! It's a step in the right direction. They shouldn't cover a tweet non-stop for days. They should be talking about issues and news. I'm so glad we agree. Yay, a step in the right direction.

Wow you really hate Natasha, I guess she struck a nerve.

http://atlantablackstar.com/2016/07/27/lock-her-up-haitians-at-dnc-accuse-hillary-clinton-of-defrauding-country-out-of-billions-for-earthquake-relief/

Yea. Wow. You want to defend that witch? Good luck. We aint puttin' up with that atrocious, horrendous, deplorable piece of human garbage any more. Lock. Her. Up. "How come nobody wants to grab MY pussy?" Because you're a horrible person. Because there really is a Snuke in your Snatch. That's why. Happy 4th of July.

Because they destroy the narrative that all black people must be against Trump. DUR. You want to paint that picture, and so naturally, you would try to denigrate any mention of them.

So go ahead. Suppose hypothetically that the Russians DID hack the DNC. Suppose it was even in favor of Trump. So…..... My question is, and drumroll please! I've been waiting for ONE liberal to explain it to me... How can you ABSOLVE yourselves from the CONTENT of the emails? They PROVED corruption, REGARDLESS of WHO hacked them. So I've been waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting for someone to explain to me, how you can sit there and blame Russia for hacking, but not answer the question about the CONTENT of the emails. Please, I'm still waiting...

Your words:

"BTW, do you even accept the conclusion of 17 out of 17 US intelligence agencies that Russia hacked the DNC, Podesta's emails, tried to hack voter rolls and embarked on a true "fake news campaign via social media to undermine Hillary and try to elect Trump?  I suspect you are with Trump on supposing it was a 400 pound man sitting on his bed."

So… NO, I do NOT accept the conclusion of "17 out of 17" US Intelligence Agencies that Russia blah blah blah. Just to answer your ridiculous question that is based on a false narrative that you just WANT to believe and don't question. You have shown yourself to be naïve in believing whole-heartedly a FAKE story, without questioning it. You have lost cred, brah.

And what's even worse, is the fact that it doesn't matter WHO hacked the DNC. What matters is the content that proves they acted unethically and corruptly, and you guys ALL day and ALL night just try to blame the hacker rather than ACCEPT that the corruption has been EXPOSED. It's INSANE. It really is. You don't wanna talk about that.