• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. leatherbear
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 4
    • Topics 1689
    • Posts 4757
    • Best 15
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by leatherbear

    • Two assholes…....

      A man who died in a horrible fire is taken to the coroner.

      He thinks it might be a guy named George he met once, but the body is so badly burned that he needs somebody to make a positive identification.

      That task falls to George's two best friends, Joe and Al.

      Joe comes over to the body and says, "He's burned pretty bad, all right. Roll him over."

      Joe looks at the dead mans butt and says, "Nope, that ain't George."

      Thinking the incident strange, the coroner says nothing, and then brings in Al to examine the corpse.

      Al takes a look at the body and says, "Wow, he's burned to a crisp. Roll him over."

      Again, the same reply, "Nope, that ain't George."

      "How can you tell?" asks the coroner.

      "Poor George had two assholes," explains Joe.

      "What? How could he have two assholes?"

      "Everybody knew George had two assholes. Whenever the three of us would go into town, everyone always said,

      "Here comes George with those two assholes!!!"

      posted in Jokes & Funny Stuff
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • Anal glaucoma…..

      A man called his boss one morning and said, "I can't make it to work today. I am sick."

      The boss asked, "What's wrong?"

      The employee replied, "I have anal glaucoma."

      The boss said, "What the hell is that?"

      The man replied, "Well, I just can't see my ass coming in to work."

      Submitted by Curtis

      posted in Jokes & Funny Stuff
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • Rubber on the end…...

      A husband and a wife are waiting at the bus stop, and with them are their nine children.

      A blind man joins them after a few minutes.

      When the bus arrives, they find that it is overloaded and only the wife and nine kids are able to fit in the bus. So the husband and the blind man decide to walk.

      After a while the husband gets irritated by the ticking of the stick of the blind man as he taps it on the sidewalk and says to him, "Why don't you put a piece of rubber at the end of your stick, that sound is driving me nuts!"

      The blind man replies, "If you would've put rubber at the end of YOUR stick, we'd be riding the bus, so shut the hell up!"

      posted in Jokes & Funny Stuff
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • Gay Guardsman Has Returned to Drills With His Unit

      Lt. Dan Choi

      By ELISABETH BUMILLER
      Published: February 11, 2010

      WASHINGTON — In a sign that the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy may be weakening under
      pressure from the White House and the Pentagon’s top leadership, Lt. Dan Choi, who is facing
      discharge from the New York Army National Guard because he publicly announced that he was
      gay, took part in a drill last weekend with his Guard unit at what he said was the encouragement
      of his commander.

      In a telephone interview on Thursday, Lieutenant Choi said that his commander was “totally
      supportive” and had asked him to participate in a weekend drill with his unit, the First Battalion,
      69th Infantry Regiment, in Fort Indiantown Gap, Pa., near Harrisburg. The unit is facing possible
      deployment to Afghanistan in 2012.

      Lieutenant Choi was never discharged from the New York Guard, but since April had not been in
      drills with his unit as he grew increasingly busy lobbying for an end to the “don’t ask, don’t tell”
      law. He instead went to substitute drills, as the Guard allows. In many cases, he said, a substitute
      drill consisted of administrative work at the 69th Regiment’s armory at Lexington Avenue and
      26th Street in Manhattan.

      He said Thursday that he was nervous about returning to drills with the unit because his case had
      become so public. “I’m more out, I think, than anybody,” he said.

      Lieutenant Choi’s commander, identified by the New York Guard as Lt. Col. John Andonie,
      declined to be interviewed. But a spokesman for the New York Guard confirmed that Lieutenant
      Choi had participated in the drill and would remain with the unit until he was formally
      discharged — when, and if, that happens.

      “We do not have an issue with it,” said the spokesman, Lt. Col. Paul Fanning, speaking of
      Lieutenant Choi’s announcement that he was gay. “It’s a deeply personal thing. To us a soldier is
      a soldier is a soldier.”

      Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
      Staff, echoing a 2008 campaign pledge by President Obama, called this month for an end to the
      16-year-old law, which forbids openly gay men and women from serving in the armed forces.

      Repeal of the law requires an act of Congress, but both Mr. Gates and Admiral Mullen have said
      they do not expect legislation any time soon. In the interim, Senator Carl Levin, the Michigan
      Democrat who is chairman of the Armed Services Committee, has said he might introduce an
      amendment to this year’s defense authorization bill that would call for a moratorium on
      discharges under the existing law.

      Lieutenant Choi, 28, a West Point graduate and Arabic linguist, served with the 10th Mountain
      Division as an Army infantry officer in Iraq in 2006 and 2007. He was a member of the New
      York Guard when he announced last March to Rachel Maddow on MSNBC that he was gay.
      Because of his public declaration, Lieutenant Choi was recommended for discharge at a hearing
      in June. That decision is now pending final approval by the Pentagon.

      Last month, Lieutenant Choi said, he received an e-mail message from his commander, Colonel
      Andonie, saying that the unit was preparing for a possible deployment and that it would be
      helpful if he trained with the unit. Lieutenant Choi said he met in late January with Colonel
      Andonie, who “just wanted to remind me that there were people in the unit waiting for me to
      come back.”

      Lieutenant Choi said he enjoyed last weekend’s drill — “shooting my rifle for the first time in a
      long while was good” — and that he expected to march next month with his unit along Fifth
      Avenue in the St. Patrick’s Day Parade, which for years barred gay men and lesbians.

      hXXp://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/12/us/12military.html

      posted in Gay News
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • Visual Proof…...

      A retired gentleman went into the local social security office to apply for aid.

      After waiting in line a long time he got to the counter. The woman behind the counter asked him for his driver's license to verify his age.

      He looked in his pockets and realized he had left his wallet at home.

      He told the woman that he was sorry but he seems to have left his wallet at home. "Will I have to go home and come back now?" He asks.

      The woman says, "Unbutton your shirt."

      He opens his shirt revealing lots of curly silver hair.

      She says, "That silver hair is proof enough for me." and processes his application.

      When he gets home, the man excitedly tells his wife about his experience.

      She says, " You should have dropped your pants, you might have qualified for disability too!"

      posted in Jokes & Funny Stuff
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • Valentine’s Question: could you give it all up?

      Timothy Kincaid
      February 12th, 2010

      _      And after all the boys and the girls that we’ve been through,
            Would you give it all up, could you give it all up, if I promise boy to you?

      - Lady Gaga, Speechless_

      This Sunday is St. Valentine’s Day, a time for romance and love. And, perhaps, a time to reflect on the value of your relationship.

      In a recent post, we analyzed the claims made about how half of gay marriages are not monogamous and found that the sample was not adequate to tell us anything whatsoever about gay marriages. But it did engender a lengthy and heated discussion about the prevalence of monogamy in the community. And various positions were argued from the perspective of the experiences of those opining.

      As we saw, while the readership at Box Turtle Bulletin is very diverse, many readers experienced a very emotional connection to the commentary. Several shared their own relationship structure.

      Which got me wondering: is your own perspective on monogamy set in stone? If your beloved came to you on Sunday and asked you to change your agreement, how flexible could you be?

      If you strongly believe that an open relationship is healthier and that outside sexual release keeps you stronger, could you give it all up to please the one you love? And if you think that a relationship built on monogamy and fidelity is sacred and smart, how would you react to your Valentine if they expressed a desire, or even a need, to have extra-relationship experiences?

      (Please be courteous to others and as respectful of their choices as you wish them to be of yours.)

      posted in Sex & Relationships
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • RE: LEATHER ~ Fisting and etc.

      ![](http://tracker.gaytorrent.ru/bitbucket/jock bound to table about to get fisted.JPG)

      jnjkhuu.jpg
      MB144 (3).jpg
      MB145 (14).jpg
      MB228 (16).jpg
      morepigsatthetroff7.jpg
      reaching inside.jpg
      spezialK-bnskin-2.jpg
      torfist (13).jpg
      xxxcuntspermedwithspeculum.jpg

      posted in Leather and Bear Community
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • RE: LEATHER ~ Fisting and etc.

      ::)

      hot_house-a_wild_ass_fisting_5_11629_9.jpg
      hot_house-fisting_4way_5_13187_7.jpg
      hot_house-fisting_4way_5_13187_8.jpg
      hot_house-fisting_4way_5_13187_9.jpg
      hot_house-fisting_4way_5_13187_10.jpg
      hot_house-fisting_4way_5_13187_11.jpg
      hot_house-fisting_4way_5_13187_12.jpg
      image13.jpg
      imm011.jpg
      imm015.jpg

      posted in Leather and Bear Community
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • RE: LEATHER ~ Fisting and etc.

      ::)

      fc hand in ass.jpg
      FF09.jpg
      firstfiststill.jpg
      Fisted 13.jpg
      Fisted 14.jpg
      gay-firsting-07.jpg
      gay-firsting-fetish-009.jpg
      hot_house-a_wild_ass_fisting_5_11629_4.jpg
      hot_house-a_wild_ass_fisting_5_11629_6.jpg
      hot_house-a_wild_ass_fisting_5_11629_7.jpg

      posted in Leather and Bear Community
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • LEATHER ~ Fisting and etc.


      1.jpg
      02.jpg
      4.JPG
      017.jpg
      011109C.jpg
      3050008.jpg
      asspiercing_0611.jpg
      doppelfist by Daniel (10).jpg
      doppelfist by Daniel (24).jpg

      posted in Leather and Bear Community
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • Little package

      Miss Bea, the church organist, was in her eighties and had never been married. She was much admired for her sweetness and kindness to all.

      One afternoon, the pastor came to call on her, and she showed him into her quaint sitting room. She invited him to have a seat while she prepared tea.

      As he sat facing her old pump organ, the young minister noticed a cut glass bowl sitting on top of it, filled with water. In the water floated, of all things, a condom!

      When she returned with tea and scones, they began to chat. The pastor tried to stifle his curiosity about the bowl of water and its strange floater, but soon it got the better of him and he could no longer resist.

      "Miss Bea," he said, "I wonder if you would tell me about this?" pointing to the bowl.

      "Oh, yes," she replied, "isn't it wonderful? I was walking through the park a few months ago, and I found this little package on the ground. The directions said to place it on the organ, keep it wet, and it would prevent the spread of disease."

      "And you know… I haven't had a cold all winter."

      posted in Jokes & Funny Stuff
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • RE: Military Times poll shows sharp decline in support for DADT

      Obama's don't ask don't tell triumph

      The move towards repealing the US military's 'don't ask, don't tell' policy has been a triumph of political choreography

      You don't need me to tell you the number of things the Democrats have messed up in the past year. But lately comes a heartening sign that sometimes, they know how to play this game. The recent rollout of the planned repeal of the US military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy has been impressively choreographed. Not a false step anywhere.

      First, stepping back: even the most ardent backers of repeal never thought that Barack Obama would put the matter on his year-one agenda. Simply too much other stuff to do. But then, lo and behold, when I think people weren't necessarily expecting it, he came out (as it were) strongly in his state of the union message in support of repeal. A state of the union address is vetted by and shared with various executive agencies of government, so the Pentagon had to know this was in the speech. Even so, past practice among Democrats on this issue and others like it would indicate that maybe things hadn't been so well worked out – that the Pentagon was dicey, but the president was plowing ahead anyway.

      And yet, when Obama mentioned the repeal, Pentagon boss man Robert Gates applauded. In fact he stood and applauded. Then, the day after Obama's speech, the Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell confirmed that the department was working on repeal plans that it would unveil next week. And next week, which is now this week, exactly that happened. Gates and Mike Mullen, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff and America's top military man, testified before the Senate yesterday backing repeal. Their positions were already known, but for them to use words as forceful as they did in a Senate forum was something.

      Especially so in Mullen's case. Gates is a civilian who will return to civilian life (perhaps soon). But Mullen is a soldier – navy, not army, but a military career man through and through. And he said yesterday: "It is my personal belief that allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly would be the right thing to do", adding that the current policy "forces young men and women to lie about who they are" as they defend their fellow citizens.

      Whoever worked this step-by-step unveiling out will deserve a lot of credit from history when repeal comes. And it does now more like a when than an if. Gates and Mullen will still move somewhat slowly. A commission will spend a year studying the likely effects of repeal. But note that the commission isn't studying whether to do it – merely the effects of doing it. And in that year, not only will soldiers and officers have time to adjust, but so will members of Congress. It's not clear yet whether a repeal would require 60 votes in the Senate. It could conceivably be passed under rules that require only a simply majority of votes, or 51. If it needs just 51, it's likely there already.

      But if 60 are needed, it's still problematic. Centrist Democrats are still afraid, and most Republicans are still against. Some are said to be privately supportive of the change, aware that support for the current policy looks increasingly reactionary, especially when the country's top military man is against you. But trying to change those Republican habits is not easy. Here's an argument. A few years ago, you folks were hailing our "coalition of the willing" allies as brave warriors, especially Britain, Spain and Poland, the non-US leaders of the coalition in terms of troop commitments. All three of those nations allow gays to serve openly. So which is it. Are they brave, right-thinking nations or sowers of pusillanimity and self-defeat? The same case could be made viz Israel, which the hawks love and which allows open service.

      This will all take time. But the policy will change. And when it does, the Obama administration and the Pentagon will deserve a lot of plaudits for the smooth choreography of the past two weeks. Now let's see them apply that to other areas, please.

      posted in Gay News
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • RE: A Sneek Peak!

        leatherbear

      posted in Personal Pictures
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • RE: Can gay footballers ever come out?

      Pat Nevin
      From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

      Patrick Kevin Francis Michael Nevin (born 6 September 1963 in Glasgow)[1] is a Scottish former footballer. In a 20-year career he played for Clyde, Chelsea, Everton, Tranmere Rovers, Kilmarnock and Motherwell as a winger.

      Professional career

      Clyde

      Nevin trained with Celtic as a youngster, but was rejected for being too small.[2] He was signed by Clyde in 1981. In his first season, the club were promoted as Scottish Second Division champions; Nevin scored twelve goals and was voted young player of the year for the division.

      Chelsea

      Nevin joined Chelsea in the summer of 1983 for £95,000, joining fellow new recruits Kerry Dixon, Nigel Spackman, David Speedie and Eddie Niedzwiecki in manager John Neal's new-look Chelsea side. Nevin's skill and pace made him a pivotal player at Chelsea and a firm favourite with the fans.

      In 1983-84, he scored 14 goals, created numerous others for the likes of Dixon and Speedie and put in some dazzling performances - during a 4-0 win over Newcastle United, he tormented the opposition defence, leaving five defenders trailing in his wake - as Chelsea won promotion as Second Division champions. In the same season he was voted Chelsea's player of the year. Chelsea finished a respectable sixth in the First Division the following year and reached the Milk Cup semi-finals, where Nevin was once again the star turn, setting up three goals in the quarter-final against Sheffield Wednesday as Chelsea came back from 3-0 down to draw 4-4; he also set up the winner for Speedie in the replay. The club were in the title race for much of the next season, with Nevin scoring a late equaliser against Liverpool at Anfield and a crucial header against West Ham United to seal a 2-1 win, though a late collapse saw Chelsea finish sixth. A year later, the club's performances dropped and they finished 14th, though Nevin was again voted Chelsea player of the year.

      Everton

      Chelsea were relegated in 1988 and Nevin was sold to Everton for £925,000. He scored 20 goals in 138 appearances for the club, but struggled to re-capture his previous form with manager Colin Harvey adopting a far more rigid system. He helped the side reach the FA Cup final in 1989, scoring the winner against Norwich City in the semi-final, but they lost 3-2 in the final to arch-rivals Liverpool. Howard Kendall returned to the club as manager in 1990; he and Nevin openly disagreed with each other, which reduced Nevin's playing opportunities, as did the arrival of new wingers Robert Warzycha and Mark Ward.

      Tranmere Rovers

      Nevin spent time on loan with fellow Merseyside club Tranmere Rovers, then in the second tier of English football, before signing permanently in 1992. The club competed in the Division One play-offs in three consecutive seasons (1992-1993, 1993-1994 and 1994-1995) but on each occasion they were eliminated in the semi-final.

      Return to Scotland

      In 1997, Nevin returned to Scotland and played for Kilmarnock and later Motherwell before retiring in 2000.

      International career

      In 1981 while playing for Clyde, he travelled to Finland to play for the Scotland under-19 team at the European Youth Championships and was named player of the tournament after helping Scotland win it.

      Nevin won 28 caps for the Scottish national side, making his debut against Romania in 1986. He scored five goals in a ten-year international career and played at Euro 92, but was not selected in the final squads for the 1986 or 1990 World Cups. He made his final appearance for Scotland in 1996.

      Retirement

      He had a stint as chief executive of Motherwell but the club were hit hard by the collapse of the SPL's television deal and went into administration.

      He now works as a television football analyst for BBC Scotland's Sportscene and Channel Five, a co-commentator for BBC Radio Five Live and as a newspaper columnist. In 1997 he published a book, In Ma Head, Son, which was co-written with psychologist Dr George Sik. The book covers his career at Tranmere during the 1996-97 season and eschews the typical footballer's autobiography being a dialogue with Sik which explores his worries, motivation and troubles as he comes to the end of his playing career.

      He has an arts degree from Glasgow Caledonian University. He was noted during his playing days for being somewhat different from the stereotypical footballer, especially through his interest in literature and the arts, and in his musical tastes, preferring The Fall and Joy Division to Phil Collins or Lionel Richie. As such, he was interviewed by the NME and was a guest presenter on Radio City during his Everton and Tranmere career. This alternative image was the inspiration for the formation, with his permission, of the team Pat Nevin's Haircut which competed in the internal Edinburgh University leagues from 1987 to 1991. It won the 1988 The Guardian "Soccer Diary" award for the worst football shirt in the UK: pink, with small blue rectangular shapes.[citation needed]

      Nevin now lives in the Borders, with his wife and two children. He participated in the "Alan Doyle and Son" show at the Borders General Hospital Radio on 7 February 2008 alongside Zander Law and local singer songwriter Jesse Rae. He is also good friends with former Hollyoaks actor and local celebrity Barry Foy.
      Allegiance

      Nevin grew up supporting Celtic,[2] but now supports SPL rivals Hibernian, watching games at Easter Road when he is not otherwise engaged for football commentary.[3] He has been reported to have switched allegiances for, among other things, feeling that his boyhood heroes had become a large corporate organisation and that Celtic Park no longer felt like home.[3] He also supports his former club Chelsea, and writes a weekly column for the Chelsea website.[4]
      References

      1. ^ PAT NEVIN, Newcastle Fans.
        2. ^ a b Pat Nevin Internet Interview, ToffeeWeb.
        3. ^ a b Nevin on Hibernian, Hibernian F.C. official website, 15 October 2009.
        4. ^ PAT NEVIN: ALL HANDS TO THE PUMP, Chelsea F.C. official website.

      External links

      * Profile from BBC Press Office ~ hXXp://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/biographies/biogs/radiofivelive/patnevin.shtml
          * Pat Nevin on the Chelsea in America Celebrity Podcast (2009).

      posted in Sports Enthusiasts
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • Can gay footballers ever come out?

      It's time to tackle homophobia on the terraces and in the dressing room, say many within the game…....

      Patrick Barkham
      The Guardian, Wednesday 10 February 2010

      He dreaded going to work with his colleagues. By the time he got into training, he was so nervous he felt sick. "I was like a bullied kid on his way to school to face his tormentors," wrote Graeme Le Saux, the former England and Chelsea defender, in his autobiography.

      For 14 years, Le Saux endured the taunts of everyone from team-mates and players such as Robbie Fowler, who bent over in front of him and pointed at his backside during a match, to thousands of vociferous fans chanting obscenities. The cultured left-back was, in a sense, England's first outed footballer. And he was not even gay.

      Le Saux's experience, just because he took an interest in the arts, read the Guardian and was not part of the game's laddish drinking culture, was so traumatic that he considered quitting football. Far worse, however, were the years of abuse suffered by Justin Fashanu, the only professional English footballer to come out as gay, who took his own life in 1998.

      After becoming Britain's first £1m black player, Fashanu's career went downhill under Brian Clough at Nottingham Forest. Hearing rumours that Fashanu was visiting gay bars, Clough confronted him, later writing in his autobiography: "'Where do you go if you want a loaf of bread?' I asked [Fashanu]. 'A baker's, I suppose.' 'Where do you go if you want a leg of lamb?' 'A butcher's.' 'So why do you keep going to that bloody poofs' club?'"

      The Justin Campaign, named in honour of Fashanu, is just one of a group of diversity and gay rights organisations who expressed "grave concerns" this week when the Football Association hurriedly cancelled the launch of a film intended to confront homophobia. Previously, it was reported that the FA had been struggling to find high-profile players to support the film; now, English football's governing body is to conduct further consultation on the hard-hitting video that shows a man abusing workmates and commuters with anti-gay taunts before doing the same at a football match. It may never be released in its current form.

      While English football's administrators dither, homophobia endures in the modern game. The stadiums may be plusher than ever but they still reverberate to offensive anti-gay chants, and homophobic "banter" is widespread in dressing rooms.

      The list of openly gay sporting heroes around the world is a short one. Famous names include basketball's John Amaechi, hurling's Donal Og Cusack, Olympic gold medal-winning diver Matthew Mitcham and, most notably in Britain, Nigel Owens, the Welsh international rugby referee, and Gareth Thomas, Wales's most-capped player and the former British Lions captain, who came out last December.

      Of about 4,000 professional footballers in England and Wales, however, none will openly acknowledge they are gay. Paul Elliott, the former Chelsea and Celtic star who works with football diversity campaign group Kick It Out, has said at least 12 Premier League players are gay. After Thomas came out, the publicist Max Clifford revealed that he advised two high-profile gay Premiership stars to keep their sexuality secret because football "remains in the dark ages, steeped in homophobia".

      The Professional Footballers' Association has taken advice from Amaechi over how to tackle homophobic abuse in the game. "There's no point beating around the bush," says its chief executive, Gordon Taylor. "Football is a macho world but then so was the armed forces, and that has changed."

      Who is to blame for the repression and prejudice hanging over football? Abusive fans? Homophobic team-mates? Or the stuffed shirts at the FA and leading clubs who haven't a clue about the modern world? Ben Summerskill, chief executive of Stonewall, describes football as "institutionally homophobic", and says the FA is significantly behind other workplaces in tackling the problem. "The FA has been in denial at a senior level, and until recently they did not acknowledge that there was any serious problem," he says.

      Traditionally homophobic, macho and conservative professions such as investment banking and the armed forces are, according to Summerskill, significantly better at addressing homophobia than football.

      "It's ironic that the work we're doing with the army is much more advanced than what is happening in football. We're sending openly gay and lesbian people to fight in Afghanistan, but we can't send openly gay people to fight for the World Cup this summer.

      "The chiefs and generals in the armed services understand that people perform better when they can be themselves at work – you feel more comfortable and are more productive – and that will be true of professional football, when it finally happens, as well."

      Rather like Le Saux, former Scotland international Pat Nevin was teased in the dressing room by fellow footballers for his esoteric tastes. "I was interested in the theatre and the arts and so I got the 'you must be gay' thing – to which I sniggered and said, 'I'm not and I don't care if you think I am,'" he says.

      During his playing career for Everton and Chelsea, Nevin was closely involved in the first anti-racism campaigns in football. But, perhaps surprisingly, he says he feels slightly differently about homophobia in the game. He believes the football world would quickly accept gay players and there are actually no insurmountable obstacles to them coming out; it is just up to them to reveal their sexuality.

      "You hate to see homophobia out there, and you don't want to hear it or have it in the clubs, but if there are any gay players they should just come out. That may sound heartless, and I am sure if you are gay there are all sorts of fears and worries, but I do think football can probably cope with it."

      In fact, Nevin believes football may be being unfairly tarnished for homophobia when there are actually very few gay footballers; he says he has never met one who is known to be gay. "Gay people have come out in other sports. Football gets battered for certain things which it doesn't deserve to get battered for. If a player comes out and is then hounded out of the game, that's when we should go for football."

      Summerskill however believes there are high-profile footballers who are gay and in a similar position to Gareth Thomas, whose sexuality was known and accepted by those close to him after Thomas confided in coaches and senior Welsh team-mates three years before he came out. But it's not an easy place to come out. "We've talked to professional footballers who have explicitly said there is homophobia in their dressing rooms," Summerskill says. "That doesn't just make a difference to whether you will come out, but also how you play."

      Clifford believes that it is unlikely a Premiership star will come out in the near future, but that if they do, they are likely to be an established, experienced star with a long career behind them and little to lose. Summerskill says he would be surprised if we did not see an openly gay footballer within a decade. But he does not believe high-profile players have a moral obligation to come out, even if it would undoubtedly help thousands of other young people – and footballers – wrestling with their sexuality. He prefers to quietly stress the positive benefits – both personal and professional – that have been widely expressed by openly gay sports stars such as Thomas and Martina Navratilova.

      Thomas, who only came out towards the end of his career, admitted that he "could never have come out without first establishing myself and earning respect as a player", but then spoke of "the amazing response" he received.

      At the PFA, Taylor fears the tragic example of Fashanu still looms large over professional footballers. But there are more encouraging instances of sporting heroes being open about their sexuality in great adversity. The Australian rugby league star Ian Roberts was the country's first professional player to come out in 1995; a courageous act in a notoriously macho sport. When he retired three years later, he reflected that, "The public reaction when I came out is my highlight over anything I've accomplished on the field."

      Watch the controversial anti-homophobia ad delayed by the FA. Warning: strong language ~ hXXp://www.guardian.co.uk/football/video/2010/feb/10/kick-homophobia-out-advertisement

      posted in Sports Enthusiasts
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • RE: 2010 Olympics

      Anything with tight spandex/lycra suits and the bulges they produce!!! 😮

      posted in Sports Enthusiasts
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • RE: Military Times poll shows sharp decline in support for DADT

      Fox News: DADT a failure and absurd

      Timothy Kincaid
      February 9th, 2010

      On Fox and Friends Weekend, Col. David Hunt, a Fox military analyst, called Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell an “abject failure”. Fox host Clayton Morris agreed, calling it a civil rights issue and absolutely absurd.

      They said Sen. John McCain is “flat wrong.”

      hXXp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JW0_rbR2cK8

      posted in Gay News
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • Military Times poll shows sharp decline in support for DADT

      Timothy Kincaid
      February 7th, 2010

      military times pollThe Military Times is a newspaper targeted at career military personnel. For the past several years the paper has been surveying its readership on the issue of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. Tomorrow they will be releasing the latest results and today they pre-reported the findings.

      Opposition to gays serving openly in the military has declined sharply among those wearing the uniform today, the Military Times newspapers will report Monday.

      An exclusive survey of some 3,000 active-duty troops shows such opposition has fallen sharply from nearly two-thirds (65 percent) in 2004 to about half (51 percent) today. The survey results appear Monday in Army Times, Air Force Times, Navy Times and Marine Corps Times.

      Those opposed to open service will likely latch onto this survey, ignore the trend, and claim that this is conclusive proof that half of America’s servicemen do not want to work with gay soldiers. But, as we noted in 2008, this survey is not even close to being representative of military personnel. In fact, only 47% of the survey participants are currently members of the military.

      This latest survey, however is closer to reflecting servicepersons as a whole. The respondants in this year’s poll were on average 4 years younger than those in 2008. And the drop in support for the DADT policy between 2008 and 2010 nearly mirrors that in the drop in percentage of participants over the age of 40, about 10%.

      The new survey is also more extensive than prior years. It asks a number of additional questions relating to gay service personnel. After deleting the veterans, lawmakers, family members and others, the following can be gleaned from this non-representative study:

      * 95% of participants identify as heterosexual. Around 2% identify as gay or bisexual and the rest ticked the “decline to answer” option.
          * Attitude about allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the military:

      14% strongly favor
            15% favor
            19% neutral
            15% oppose
            36% strongly oppose
          * Of those who oppose open service, 54% believe that sexual oriention is a choice while only 34% of those who favor open service have that belief.
          * If the ban were overturned, about 38% believe that gay couples should receive the same benefits as straight couples and about 44% oppose the idea.
          * The most challenging issues for the military should the policy be overturned are believe to be reducing harassment against openly gay personnel, and reducing violence and hate crimes against gay personnel.
          * 56% know that there are gay people in their unit, 17% do not believe that there are and the rest aren’t certain.
          * Of those who found out about a gay person in their unit, 2% reported them up the chain of command.

      There were also a number of subsets of if-then questions which sought to get opinions about levels of comfort or discomfort. I did not attempt to make meaning of them.

      Based on this non-representative survey, it would appear that about half of career military service personnel are opposed to open service, about one third strongly opposed. However, very few are actually willing to end a fellow soldier’s career when the subject becomes personal rather than theoretical.

      posted in Gay News
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • RE: Iowans couldn’t care less about gay marriage

      Iowa’s anti-gay marriage bill is dead for another year
      Timothy Kincaid
      February 9th, 2010

      In a publicity stunt (send money) Republicans in the Iowa legislature tried to pull from committee legislation that would begin the process of changing the state constitution to ban gay marriage. As expected, the Democrat controlled House and Senate both said, “no thanks, dead in that committee is fine with me.”

      However, we should be appreciative of the Republicans. After all, this effort revealed two Democrats who hate equality so much that they were willing to defy party loyalty and vote to pull the bills from committee. They are Senator Tom Hancock and Representative Dolores Mertz.

      Gay Iowans, and indeed all Iowans who believe that each citizen is entitled to equal treatment under the law, are invited to find and support primary opponents for these two legislators.

      posted in Gay News
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • Iowans couldn’t care less about gay marriage

      Timothy Kincaid
      February 8th, 2010

      When the Iowa Supreme Court determined that denying state services based on sexual orientation was unconstitutional and that the State of Iowa must provide marriage equality, you could almost slice the glee of the Iowa Republican Party. Finally, there was an issue which they could use to perhaps increase their influence and maybe even win a few elections. So they because the “no gay marriage” party.

      Last year they made several attempts at getting an anti-gay marriage constitutional amendment up for a legislative vote and were unsuccessful. They chortled that Democrats would be sorry come election time.

      But as it has turned out, running opposed to gay marriage has not proven to be a winning strategy. To their surprise, Iowans couldn’t care less about stopping gay folk from marrying. Literally.

      The Des Moines Register conducted a poll of Iowans asking, “The state Legislature can address large and small issues during the course of the session. For the following issues, please tell me if you think the issue does or does not deserve the Legislature’s limited time.” Banning gay marriage did not make the cut; only 36% thought it was worth the time discussing.

      Not only was it not deemed worthy of legislative time, of the six issues that Iowans were questioned about, addressing gay marriage concerned them the least. Iowans were more concerned about payday loans and puppy mills than they were about whether same-sex couples married.

      This lack of interest appears to be reflected in a change in strategy in the campaigns of Republicans running for the party’s nomination for governor. Just a brief while ago they were all running to see who could be more extreme and reactionary.

      Bob Vander Plaats pledged to halt such weddings with an executive order (an authority the governor does not wield) while Chris Rants declared that he’d veto every bill that reached his desk until the legislature voted on a constitutional amendment to ban marriage equality. Most of them supported calling for a constitutional convention so they wouldn’t have to wait for two sessions and a popular vote.

      Only former governor Terry Branstad, also an opponent of gay marriage, chose not to run as a raving loon. Branstad took a more nuanced approach and expressed recognition of the difficulties that gay couples face when denied certain rights.

      But that has changed. The race now appears to be between Branstad and Vander Plaats, and the latter has now discovered a different campaign strategy. (Register)

      I’ve talked to Vander Plaats from time to time, but hadn’t really seen him out on the stump since last fall. His speeches used to give prime attention to conservative issues and gay marriage. This time, he focused entirely on job creation, state spending and education. Nobody even asked about the social issues.

      I mentioned to him afterward that was a significant change from last summer, when he told me in an interview that he thought the election would hinge on two issues: gay marriage and the state smoking ban.

      “Did I say that?” he asked. Yes, I told him.

      “Campaigns always evolve, no doubt about it,” he said. (He didn’t mention the smoking ban at all today.)

      Yes, there is no doubt that campaigns evolve, especially when the voters care less about your pet issue than they do about monitoring dog breeders.

      posted in Gay News
      leatherbear
      leatherbear
    • 1
    • 2
    • 173
    • 174
    • 175
    • 176
    • 177
    • 237
    • 238
    • 175 / 238