We are 'curating' only upload descriptions which are reported, basically as infringing to:
11. Any information, e.g. the title, categories, pictures and description must correctly represent the content of the files shared with the torrent and avoid misleading members about the content. This applies as well to additions, votes or comments made by other members than the original uploader. In doubt, rather than providing wrong information, omit it.
….
of the Upload Rules and that mostly based on information provided by reporting members or in comments.
So basically the library is as good organised as the uploading members make them and the others take care. This means members must make reports if they want something in a torrent presentation improved. I can only repeat: Reports, Reports, Reports, …
There are many different correct ways an uploader might name/title an upload. For example:
The models name ('Kevin and Matt' or 'Kevin & Matt')
The movie name and scene number ('Hot Barebacking Scene 2")
Studio / site name and models ('Bareback Feeders - Kevin & Matt')
Adding definition ('720p') or digital file container format ('mp4)
Combinations of above….
(…) When I originally posted this to the Help Desk, I was reminded of the DCMA ... (...)
DMCA might be a motivation for is wrong titling, however is the wrong action. If a member "fears" his upload will be taken down on notices from the owners, he should not upload it. Period.
As long as a human can identify what the upload is, agents will be able, too and it will still be taken down. The only thing achieved will be a reduced user experience by harder to identify uploads, and impossible to find with a search (and therefore useless once back a few pages).
If something can't be identified it likely will be against the rule 11. of the Upload Rules.
The search guide might help you:
https://www.gaytorrent.ru/uploadguide.php?lan=1#500
