Posts made by bgxc52

Thx for the informative post, this is an excellent anthology, now available and worth supporting, imo! ty again.

Hi cumeaternc, just wondering if you ever found more work by this artist? ty!

Well, another just went down. That's two, both very old (seeding 5+ months), different companies. Makes no sense.

Hi, just wondering why El Rancho got deleted. Sometimes when my torrents turn "red" I just need to re-download the torrent itself and start seeding again. It's no big deal - I still have it, after all - I was just curious.

Also is there a place we can look to see reasons why, like a Log? TIA!

Very nice work, it really adds to the enjoyment when the writing is so beautiful!

I like seeing these reproduced at the correct size without having to deal with those messy downloads where some comics are repeated 4x, some are out of order, and some are missing! It would be awesome if someone re-posted all the Kakes in order… but in the meanwhile I am very glad to see again whatever you choose to share!

@cumeaternc:

@bgxc52:

Sorry if this is a dumb question but how are we supposed to see these?? I tried to save-as, but you can't enlarge it. I can't see the print or the detail. Too bad because these look wonderful!

Because of size restrictions on picture uploads to bitbucket I cannot post the originals.  What resolution is your monitor because I can read all the panels posted?  This is a scan from a book(not mine) so short of someone editing the originals, the text on the spines of the book is not as good.

Darn. My monitor is… very small.  13", it's one of the old ones. Can you post somewhere besides bitbucket? this is the perfect drawing style, I absolutely love these & would be very happy to get anything this artist has done. Thank you for any help!

(Can you just post as zipped attachments, perhaps?)

Sorry if this is a dumb question but how are we supposed to see these?? I tried to save-as, but you can't enlarge it. I can't see the print or the detail. Too bad because these look wonderful!

The problem with setting these programs to take shots automatically, at intervals, is… you get a lot of blurry shots that way! Short of going through something for favourite angles or scenes (which takes more time than most of us have), I don't see any easy way of mixing "automated" with "hand-picked" (or even "in focus"!) How do you guys do it?? Open to suggestions. Cheers!

@Uwe:

What you see on your Profile page for each torrent and on the peer list in the torrent description are only the last seeding session amounts

Ahah! ok, so that's where part of my confusion came from, thank you for clarifying.

@Uwe:

Then the discrepancy […] can come from inproper stop of the torrents and/or µTorrent (e.g. just shutting down µTorrent without upon stopping the torrents and waiting a minute or so) making loosing the update since last update (every 30 minutes). Stopping the torrent forces such update out of schedule. Lost connection (e.g. WiFi) may result in loss of updates to the tracker, too.

It wouldn't be WiFi, but it could be the other things, of course. So then the issue seems to be intermittent, rather than ongoing or structural: just something that happens now & then. Ok, very good. Thanks again for your help!

Hi, new here but not to torrents….

I'm currently seeding 5 files. All have uploaded something--a few, very small amounts; several, 3+ gigs each. That is according to uTorrent (most recent version)... on my end. Here, however... the amounts seeded are not accurately reflected on my Profile page. Neither do they show up if I go to the torrents and look under the list for peers.

So basically I can't tell if things are working quite as they should or not, because my overall stats are in--approximately--the right range, and I am getting bonus points for hours spent seeding.

--I have tried normal things like pausing, then stopping torrents while logged in here; then logging off; shutting down browser; clearing cache; logging back on; and then restarting torrents, one by one.

--I am connectable, ports forwarded correctly

--I seed at other sites, all private. All are reflecting statistics accurately.

Again, it is quite possible this site is also reflecting statistics accurately in a big-picture way: I've uploaded 5.5gig, according to the site, & downloaded 2.65gig. That's at least in the ballpark.

But basically: I'd like to know if this is a common problem here, or just me. Some sites seem to never miss a trick, & reflect upload statistics very accurately. Others can be erratic. Thanks for any suggestions!  --bgxc52