"True Journalism" - more lying for Hamas
-
LOL, you are a clown.
Plenty of CTs have since been proven true. A long time ago, I did a list of over 500 CTs that were later proven true. Some of them we know thanks to Bill Clinton and Thatcher declassifying documents in their respective countries.
MI5 and MI6 (UK's version of FBI and CIA, respectively) for 30+ years lied about actively working to take out Harold Wilson's government. For some reason, they finally admitted it was all true.
COVID came from the lab in Wuhan was a CT, but now it's fact.
The vaccines DO NOT prevent you from getting covid was a CT, now it's a fact.
Your beloved "true journalism" has long been part of the conspiracy to spread lies.
They were Fauci's whores.
They are Hamas' whores.
The list is never-ending.
Let's not forget that Russian Collusion was a lie, spread by your "true journalism".
51 intel experts lied in public and your "true journalism" spread those lies faster than they spread their legs. Once Shitty Schift's secret bunker hearing was declassified, your "true journalism" didn't say anything about how they blatantly lied. Idiots like you refused to watch the Tucker Carlson video where he showed actual public video on your "true journalism" sites and compared that with their sworn testimony in the secret hearings saying the complete opposite, because you losers knew it would clash with your religion.
It took CBS more than 2 years to finally admit Hunter's laptop is real. This was despite the FBI even admitting it was real.
-
@raphjd It's so cute, how lib clowns spew conspiracy nonstop 24/7/365 with every breath of their lives - then say oh no it's not us.
-
@raphjd And Tinkerbell is real. You are so far down the rabbit hole that there is no saving you.
-
@jaroonn said in "True Journalism" - more lying for Hamas:
@raphjd And Tinkerbell is real. You are so far down the rabbit hole that there is no saving you.
No idea what that's supposed to mean.
A lot of CTs are proven true. It may not happen quickly, but they do happen.
Then again, maybe you are claiming that Bill Clinton and the DNC, as well as Margaret Thatcher and the Tories, forged a bunch of classified documents just so they could declassify them in order to trick the world.
Even the Biden Admin now admits that COVID came from the Wuhan lab.
Every MSM outlet now admits that Hunter's laptop is real.
Even the FBI and DOJ admit Hunter's laptop is real.
Only in your crackhead liberal world are these things all CTs and lies.
I bet you still believe that Kyle Rittenhouse killed 4 black men.
I bet you blame the red SUV for killing the 6 people in the Christmas parade and that Darrell Brown had noting to do with it.
I bet you believe Joy Reid that someone went back in time to hack her social media to make her look like a homophobe. Despite her admitting that she lied and it was her all along.
You are a typical liberal ass clown, at best.
Now go beat your tiny dick to more liberal violence.
-
@jaroonn You don't even know what a meme is.
@raphjd posted snapshot of a Reuters tweet. A screen shot.
Which Reuters as "true journalists" later altered or overrode no mistake acknowledged.
You do know, barely on some dim brain-dead level, that Reuters lies - as do you. That your viewpoint comes from unreality.
And that one good meme will blow it to pieces.
And you're threatened & jealous.
Here's you - on a good day, before you fall to pieces:
-
@raphjd You lose that bet. Your presumptions are both amusing and tedious. What a sad case.
-
Ah, so you don't even believe your beloved "true journalism".
I'm curious why you want us to worship your beloved "true journalism" as much as you claim to, when even you don't believe their lies.
You lefties are a weird species.
-
Don't worry @jaroonn is here to say how he's done with us.... again & again... SO much doneing to be done forever nonstop, a done person's job of doneing is never done.
-
@raphjd I applaud your bravery of not being ashamed to parade your intellectual limitations.
-
And yet, I understand that your beloved "true journalism" lies and you don't.
I also understand that "I'm against terrorism, but I support the actions of terrorists" is bullshit.
You still haven't explained why Reuters edited that article, but won't tell us what exactly they edited. Does your "true journalism" have something to hide?
-
@raphjd I didn't write the article, so I don't know what they updated...neither do you. But facts don't matter to conspiracy theorists, do they? They have no problem filling in the blanks with their usual BS.
-
I posted a screenshot of Reuters' tweet, with a "meme" showing the 13 people released. You attacked me for it.
Now you post some clearly edited shit by Reuters, claiming that it's the truth.
You don't know what they edited in that article, but you claim the screenshot of their tweet is fake.
You have no evidence, other than your liberal stupidity, that the Reuters is fake, but we have absolute proof, provided by Reuters themselves that they edited (stealthily) the article you posted.
-
@raphjd said in "True Journalism" - more lying for Hamas:
@jaroonn
I posted a screenshot of Reuters' tweet, with a "meme" showing the 13 people released. You attacked me for it.You seriously do not find that tweet suspect? Considering Reuters is a news agency, do you think they are in the habit of sending one line tweets about major stories? Find the original tweet from Reuters, and then we can talk. Use your critical thinking skills.
-
Umm, I know you are a liberal, but you can delete tweets. It happens all the time.
It's just like your beloved "true journalism" loves to stealth edit articles, after they got the liberal narrative out.
We have seen it with countless things in liberal media; ie Covington kids, KC Chiefs kid, Russian collusion, Trump's taxes, everything involving covid, Johnny Deppand countless others.
Your "true journalism" spread the liberal lies then either deleted them or stealth edited them, once your narrative went global.
Reuters is a fact checker, who for some reason doesn't fact-check liberals unless they deviate from the liberal dogma. So clearly, they are "honest".
-
@raphjd In other words, you can't find it....because it was deleted.
By the way, even if it was a typo, why would it matter if they released soldiers or hostages? What liberal narrative would that help? And why would Hamas release soldiers? And why does the caption above the video not match the caption in the video?
Inquiring minds want to know
-
I found it when I posted it. So I have no intention to look for it again.
It matters because if they kidnapped civilians, international law has a different outlook than if they kidnapped military. Terrorism vs military action.
Are you seriously that dumb?
-
@raphjd They kidnapped a lot of civilians. Everyone knows that.
Nice try.
-
You are an idiot.