Why kids can't consent to puberty blockers
-
-
UK does 90-day emergency ban on puberty blockers:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-restrictions-on-puberty-blockers
-
@raphjd Nothing ridiculous about that considering that child is maybe 4 and a long way off from puberty. Given that rationale, he should never be allowed to vote
Why didn't they just use an infant, or an unborn fetus? Why do I expect anything resembling logic and reason from the whacked out right? -
NOTE: Things changed after I posted that.
UMM, DUMB ASS, Scotland tried making it so 4yos could change their gender. After a fuck ton of pushback, they moved it to 8yo.
I know you are retarded, but liberals say that people under 25 should not go to prison because their brains are not functioning properly, therefor they aren't criminally responsible.
If a little kid can decide to change sex, without a parent's permission, then they are mature enough to be held criminally responsible.
In many places you can't get a tattoo before the age of 18, even if your parent agrees. But these same places allow kids to decide to get sex changes.
Prior to the rule change on puberty blockers in the UK, a kid could decide on their own if they wanted to take them. If parents objected, they could be prosecuted and possibly be stripped of custody of their kids.
I have posted a bunch of threads on why it's extremely hypocritical on the way society treats trans issues compared to things like tattoos and even worse to criminal responsibility.
Sadly, liberals are too stupid to get it.
They see that a serial rapist who raped from the ages of 13 to 24 when he was finally caught shouldn't be sent to prison because his brain isn't fully developed until 25, but at 8 he should be able to take sex change drugs and get parts cut off because his brain is fully matured.
Likewise, an 8yo is mature enough to make life-altering decisions on his own if it's about gender, but can't get a non-visible tattoo for another 10 years because it's life-altering. If he wants a visible tattoo (face, neck, and/or hands) he has to wait 13 more years because that's life-altering. Scotland might have pushed this up to 25yo for a visible tattoo, but I don't remember if that passed or not.
-
@raphjd You know what? You are not a child psychologist not a pediatrician. I can also guess, that you are not the parent of trans child (thank god!)
You post stupid shit to try to make a point, but fail because it's irrelevant.
I honestly do not have an opinion on this topic because I am not affected by it nor am I an expert in the field. You, however, seem to have to have an opinion on everything and are always damn sure it's right. But it's not. It's only a laymen's opinion. If you want to support that opinion, why not back it up with actual data and research rather than lame memes and videos?
-
Clearly, logic is not your strong suit.
My opinion is supported by the "logic" espoused by liberals.
Your hysterical rant shows that you do have a position and it's just as pathetic as the liberal logic I pointed out.
-
@raphjd Logic? Can you tell me how many young people have committed suicide because they couldn't get a tattoo?
Eight-year-olds cannot get puberty blockers "on their own." It's a decision made with parents and doctors. Furthermore, they do not cause permanent change. In fact, that is why they have been used for more than 30 years. They pause puberty so that the patient has time to make up their mind and doesn't have to go through changes that might cause severe psychological trauma. Hormones and such are only given to older patients once it has been determined that is what they want.
Medicine/Psychology cannot be summed up in a stupid meme. If you want to educate yourself, you can read this. Provided reading an article from CNN won't burn your retinas
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/03/15/health/puberty-blockers-explained-nhs-wellness/index.html
-
LOL, CNN as an authority.
You need to look at the cases that are working their way through the courts around the Western world. What you are claiming is the utopian lie of your beloved "true journalism".
Look through these forums. We've discussed things that liberals have not been fully honest about.
One of the clinics (can't remember it's name, but it's a famous sex change clinic) lied and said they didn't do sex changes on minors, despite their website saying they did. Once caught, they edited their website, but only raised the age 2 or 3 years, not realizing that even that age was still minors.
The Danish study intentionally left out negative cases. We know this thanks to whistleblowers. In one of the cases, the person died because, thanks to puberty blockers, they had a micro penis so they had to part of the colon to give him a "vagina". He died from Ecoli.
AGAIN, if a person's brain is not fully developed until 25, then they should have to wait until 25 to to make such a life-altering decision.
Regardless of the liberal word game bullshit, a life altering thing is a life altering thing. You don't get to pick and choose if you want to be taken seriously. If the brain is no fully developed until 25, then it's not developed until 25. You don't get to pick and choose to suit your agenda.
People commit suicide for all kinds of reasons. The UK has had white kids commit suicide because they were tormented by non-whites and the schools did fuck all to protect them, because of the color and/or religion of their abusers. You are just as guilty when you keep saying "poor, poor white people" when bad things happen to us.
-
@raphjd Well, like I said. You are not an authority and your opinions don't matter. So you can just sit in your rocking chair, clutching your pearls, and judge the world. So provincial and narrow-minded.
-
@raphjd said in Why kids can't consent to puberty blockers:
People commit suicide for all kinds of reasons.
You are kind of a cold-hearted cunt, aren't you?
-
And you still have nothing to rebut my opinion, other than your hysteria.
Even your liberal "logic" sides with me.
-
@jaroonn said in Why kids can't consent to puberty blockers:
@raphjd said in Why kids can't consent to puberty blockers:
People commit suicide for all kinds of reasons.
You are kind of a cold-hearted cunt, aren't you?
You don't give a fuck about anyone but the ones who want sex changes.
You even say "poor, poor white people" so you don't give a fuck about the kids that have committed suicide over being abused. You don't care about old white people being drug from their cars, beaten and their car being stolen because some black people did it.
That shows you are a cold-hearted cunt, too.
-
@raphjd said in Why kids can't consent to puberty blockers:
And you still have nothing to rebut my opinion, other than your hysteria.
Even your liberal "logic" sides with me.No, it doesn't. And I don't need to rebut you. This is not my area of expertise, and the vast majority of experts in the field absolutely rebut you. As does their research. Which doesn't consist of memes
-
@raphjd said in Why kids can't consent to puberty blockers:
That shows you are a cold-hearted cunt, too.
I'm really not. The "poor white people" was sarcastic and you know it. Besides, I'm white for fucksake.
Right-wingers show the total lack of compassion and empathy on a daily basis. You know you don't really care about people. You just want to criticize liberals no matter what. It's good to have a hobby I guess. But don't pretend you are a compassionate person. Everyone knows better.
-
You keep telling yourself that you care about anyone, who doesn't agree with you and ticks certain boxes. Even then, you'll throw them under the bus if someone, who in your eyes, is deemed more worthy comes along.
Just because you are white, doesn't mean a fucking thing. There are plenty of white people that hate white people. Liberals can't exist without whites hating whites.
You did the same "poor, poor white people" that the vile Simone Sanders did over the gang of blacks who pulled the 70+yo white man from his car, beat him, and left him lying in the street while they stood his car. You might remember that you threw in the justification of some shit you made up in your head about how blacks are treated.
-
@raphjd cereal rapists did not exist before Quaker Oats made those seductive little toasted oatey-o's with the hole in the middle.
-
@raphjd said in Why kids can't consent to puberty blockers:
Liberals can't exist without whites hating whites.
You should write a book. I'd love to see the reviews.
-
@raphjd said in Why kids can't consent to puberty blockers:
You did the same "poor, poor white people" that the vile Simone Sanders did over the gang of blacks who pulled the 70+yo white man from his car, beat him, and left him lying in the street while they stood his car. You might remember that you threw in the justification of some shit you made up in your head about how blacks are treated.
I'm trying to figure out if I'm a poor writer or you are a poor reader.
-
You also did similar about anti-white racism.
Racism is racism, despite how liberals try to twist it to suit their agenda.
BTW, if I wrote a book based on my beliefs, of course, the insane liberals would hate it because I'd out their idiocy. Let's not forget that you people are the same as Charles Manson. You want a race war, believing that blacks would win, but that they are too stupid to run things on their own, so they would need you as their white saviors.
Last year that LA female (assuming her gender) politician was against stiffening the punishment for stealing catalytic converters because it would criminalize a certain community. Just recently, a white soap star was murdered by a gang from said "community" when he and a co-worker stumbled upon them stealing his catalytic converter.
You people are extremely weak on crime so you don't "criminalize" the criminals. Then you act like your weakness on crime had nothing to do with such acts.
It's the same with Jamal Newton. Your weakness on crime is why he was repeatedly allowed to commit violent acts. You kept making sure Jamal Newton could keep getting out so he could keep committing violent acts.
It's not just Jamal Newton, but countless violent criminals that you keep setting free to prey on society.
I chuckle whenever I see liberals getting some of the crime they love seeing everyone else being a victim of.
-
@jaroonn said in Why kids can't consent to puberty blockers:
@raphjd said in Why kids can't consent to puberty blockers:
You did the same "poor, poor white people" that the vile Simone Sanders did over the gang of blacks who pulled the 70+yo white man from his car, beat him, and left him lying in the street while they stood his car. You might remember that you threw in the justification of some shit you made up in your head about how blacks are treated.
I'm trying to figure out if I'm a poor writer or you are a poor reader.
I asked my husband and he said that it was sarcasm, from a twatish place.
It was a sarcastic comment, coming from a racist place.
Neither you nor Simone Sanders (and the rest of the left) actually give a fuck about that 70+yo white man being drug from his car, beaten, left lying in the street, and having his car stolen by a group of blacks, while they live-streamed it. You people think it's virtuous to not give a fuck about white victims of crime.
