Impeach Biden: support keeps growing, now at 53% overall
-
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 53% of Likely U.S. voters believe that, since becoming president, Biden has committed high crimes and misdemeanors that would justify Congress impeaching him
53%
Meanwhile, separate but interesting, Durham Report has just exonerated Trump.....
... fact-checking USA media, Dems & FBI as GIANT HOAXERS for their 7 years crying "Russshhhiaaa!"
-
@blablarg18 And yet probably not one of those could name an actual impeachable offense that Biden has actually committed. But who needs facts when you've got that genius Taylor-Greene in charge.
The Durham report wasn't exactly conclusive, but it doesn't matter. There is a LOT more in store for the Orange Fuhrer. And you know DeSantis can't wait for it to happen! lol
-
@jaroonn 1. Refusing to secure borders; allowing foreign invasion.
-
Refusing to secure borders; allowing fentanyl to kill 60k USA peeps per year.
-
Messing with DOJ, Treasury, etc. investigations on behalf of his son.
-
Decades of influence-peddling / taking bribes from foreign powers. (details still developing, may have been mainly when Biden was VP)
-
Subset of #4, severe mishandling of thousands of classified documents.
-
It's now proven that Biden campaign colluded illegally with CIA to rig 2020 election. (see https://community.gaytorrent.ru/topic/62210/ussa-2020-election-cia-rigged-at-blinken-s-behest/)
Just a few possibilities. Off the top of my head.
Guess when ur Lib Dumbass living in Lib Bubble, u don't know these things.
PS. Durham Report 100% conclusive.
But there again, Lib Dumbass living in Lib Bubble....
-
-
Harvard/Harris
-
@blablarg18 My only question is impeach him for what and with what evidence? I mean, don't get me wrong, the dude is a total senile creep, but impeachment requires a wrong doing that can be proven.
-
@MrMazda "requires wrong doing" - Could say "Not anymore! Thanks, Pelosi!"
Or could say "It never did - USA House indicts on what it wants".
Or could refer you to possibilities listed above.
Border is a basic function of government.
USA White House Resident isn't responsible for every illegal crossing or fentanyl death... except...
President trying to stop them legit is one thing, Resident not even trying is another thing.
-
@blablarg18 So let's see what happens. My money is on Biden will not be impeached, Trump will go to jail, and DeSantis will take over the party of deplorables. But he won't win. The current face of the GOP is a pack of imbeciles who think they are the smartest people in the room and don't realize that all the intelligent people are rolling their eyes. Boebert, MTG, Jordan and Comer: The Three Stooges plus one.
-
@blablarg18 The people responsible for fentanyl deaths are the people who take fentanyl. What happened to personal responsibility?
-
@jaroonn @serenity Assuming your USA, you just joked away 60k deaths of fellow citizens. Each year.
No wonder USA in trouble.
As to fentanyl: My understanding is, China & drug cartels been lacing it in their other products - Most deaths accidental.
Like if u went to buy ur Depends Extra Big at Walmart (though u believe in small artisan stores or whatever), and put on ur new Depends, and product was secretly laced with flesh-eating poison out of Greek myth.
Hope it never happens.
-
@blablarg18 So the Mexicans are sneaking fentanyl into your Taco Bell? Nope. Fentanyl is a cheap substitute for heroin, but much harder to regulate dosage. People don't die from "bad" fentanyl, they die from "too much" fentanyl.
When did conservatives start caring so much about drug addicts? Over the years their compassionate solution has been to cut funding for rehabilitation and just throw them into prison. They only care now because they think they can blame this on "the border." Well, newsflash: If Americans didn't buy drugs, people wouldn't risk smuggling them here.
And admirable attempt at stereotyping me. Fail.
-
@jaroonn Not even close to where I'm at.
Take the L...... you're embarrassing yourself. (Get some metaphorical Depends.)
-
@blablarg18 Yeah. Keep telling yourself that.
-
More polls, Harvard-Harris. Trump beats Biden by 7.
DeSantis beats Biden by 0. (that is, he doesn't)
And Trump beats DeSantis by 42 points, doubling his 20-point lead from January.
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trumps-lead-over-ron-desantis-more-doubles-1801590
Meanwhile, separate but interesting, Durham Report still says:
FBI failed to uphold their important mission of strict fidelity to the law.
CNN summary was still:
Special Counsel Durham Concludes FBI Never Should Have Launched Trump-Russia Probe
Now official facts, 100% conclusive.
-
@blablarg18 said in Impeach Biden: support keeps growing, now at 53% overall:
More polls, Harvard-Harris. Trump beats Biden by 7.
DeSantis beats Biden by 0. (that is, he doesn't)
And Trump beats DeSantis by 42 points, doubling his 20-point lead from January.
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trumps-lead-over-ron-desantis-more-doubles-1801590
Meanwhile, separate but interesting, Durham Report still says:
FBI failed to uphold their important mission of strict fidelity to the law.
CNN summary was still:
Special Counsel Durham Concludes FBI Never Should Have Launched Trump-Russia Probe
Now official facts, 100% conclusive.
Hardly.
That CNN article about Durham clearly states (and something you cherry-picked for your own use) it was "according to a report compiled over three years by the Trump-administration appointee"
Emphasis on the fact he was appointed by Trump...which makes him unreliable and untrustworthy.
Also, The Hill is far-right leaning and also obviously not trustworthy since they are far-right.
-
@jaroonn said in Impeach Biden: support keeps growing, now at 53% overall:
@blablarg18 So let's see what happens. My money is on Biden will not be impeached, Trump will go to jail, and DeSantis will take over the party of deplorables. But he won't win. The current face of the GOP is a pack of imbeciles who think they are the smartest people in the room and don't realize that all the intelligent people are rolling their eyes. Boebert, MTG, Jordan and Comer: The Three Stooges plus one.
Exactly. I agree with you 100%. There's really nothing to impeach him over, except for the fact that the GOP is a bunch of arseholes and just want him out. Trump needs to start getting fitted for him orange jumpsuit. LB, MTG, Jordan, and Comer are a bunch of idiots. MTG does NOTHING but bitch and complain about utter b.s.
-
-
@blablarg18 Do you wear a different coloured tin foil hat every time you leave the house?
You sound like you're either suffering from a serious UN-diagnosed and/or untreated mental health condition. I see your lips moving, but all I'm seeing is hot air. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but it's just the way it is.
-
@MrMazda Good one. Nice impression of a lib, doing their fact-free bit.
-
@cinemacapman Guess you missed this thread: https://community.gaytorrent.ru/topic/62280/cnn-jake-tapper-durham-report-devastates-fbi-exonerates-trump
I was quoting CNN's chiron.
To paint full pic: While Jake Tapper was saying
it is, regardless, devastating to the FBI
CNN showed a chiron beneath him, saying (as CNN's view - That is what a chiron is):
Special Counsel Durham Concludes FBI Never Should Have Launched Trump-Russia Probe
K?
With your permission. I know it's hard to accept that you were lied to, so much for so long.
As to you saying
Durham... Trump-appointee... unreliable
Nope!
Durham was actually the choice of AG Bill Barr who kinda hates Trump, and Durham's own reputation is: Democrat but non-partisan, factual, trusted by all.
PS. Shooting The Messenger doesn't work with me - It only underlines the fact that you haven't bothered to read the report, so you don't really know the gazillion horrifying facts Durham found.
Would your ears open if it came from an Out Gay guy with husband & kids? Here's Glenn Greenwald, you can watch at high speed.
-
@blablarg18 This is where I got the "Trump appointee" info after Googling for your "quote".
https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/15/politics/john-durham-report-fbi-trump-released/index.html
Which says, in the very first paragraph:
"Special counsel John Durham concluded that the FBI should never have launched a full investigation into connections between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia during the 2016 election, according to a report compiled over three years by the Trump-administration appointee and released on Monday."Again...key part is "Trump-administration appointee"...regardless of what Jake Tapper said or CNN had up on-screen. The "Breaking News" is simply quoting what that article stated that Durham had "concluded". They were not saying it themselves, nor was Jake Tapper saying it as his own opinion or interpretation.
So, once again, as you right-wingers and Trumpers always do, you twisted something out of context or what the deeper meaning was to suit your own purpose.
As I said above: Emphasis on the fact Durham was appointed by Trump...which makes him unreliable and untrustworthy.