Because we have a useless liberal troll who doesn't know who to search
-
Here's one of the court cases. ^^^
In the Stossel case (link above) Facebook/Meta said that despite labeling things as "fact" or "fact checked", it's not actually fact but opinion.
In the Candice Owens case, he repeated that fact checkers were not stating "fact" but rather "protected opinion" even if that fact checker had a vested interest to oppose Candice Owens because they worked for a direct competitor of Owens' business.
Not surprisingly, most of the liberal sites use the same group of fact checkers.
-
This was discussed in this forum section previously, but a troll is gonna troll.
Hopefully, I held your vagina enough for you, again.
-
@raphjd I don't see where Zuckerberg testified. You didn't provide a link to his testimony. That would be so helpful if you did.
And of course it would be wonderful if you could illuminate us on the difference between fact checking and checking for media bias. Surely you know that those are two different things right?
The speed of light from Earth to the Moon in real time (c = 3×10^8 m/s) -
Your media bias checker said they use the same "fact checkers" that the rest of the liberal sites claim to use, including Facebook/Meta.
-
BTW, it's funny how you tried to claim the story was fake because a biased media bias checker site said not to trust the source I provided when even ultra-leftist rags are now posting about the story.
It reminds me of Hunter Biden's laptop and so many other stories.
Oh, and you can do a bit of work on your own.
-
@raphjd that ridiculous link that you left to Breitbart said Facebook lawyers testified. Last I checked Zuckerberg is not a Facebook lawyer. You still haven't provided evidence of his testimony. That you said he gave.
Like when Zuckerberg testified before the Congressional hearing .....you know, providing testimony in a congressional building ....here's the link to that testimony
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/download/zuckerberg-testimony?download=1
See how easy that was ? why is it so difficult for you to follow up on the things that you mention
That media bias checker website doesn't use any of what you say it uses... you made all that up out of thin air
-
@raphjd oh, and, Zuckerberg mentions in his testimony the success of Facebook's independent third party fact checkers on page 1
The speed of light from Earth to the Moon in real time (c = 3×10^8 m/s) -
Are you saying that Zuckerberg didn't approve of the defense that Facebook/Meta "fact-checkers" are not stating FACT, but rather they are only spouting OPINIONS?
Are you really that stupid?
-
@raphjd I'm saying the media bias website which classifies as garbage most of the websites you like to peruse (and link to here in the forum for your various "news stories") uses the methodology from IFCN @ Poynter for their fact checking. That has nothing to do with Facebook.
I'm also saying that the methodology they use for bias checking is a mathematical formula which also has nothing to do with Facebook.
The speed of light from Earth to the Moon in real time (c = 3×10^8 m/s) -
Are you really that dumb?
Facebook/Meta uses the same "fact checkers" that Media Bias uses.
Those are the same "fact checkers" that labeled things as False, which are now proven to be true.
Those are the same "fact checkers" that did not fact check liberals, except in extremely rare cases. Not once did the fact check the claims that the covid vaccine PREVENTS getting and spreading the virus, even though it was clearly a lie. They haven't fact checked the liberal lies about Biden's economy being far better than Trump's. Did your beloved "fact checkers" ever fact check the lies about Kyle Rittenhouse? Of course, not because of their leftist bias.
Their bias is clear for the world to see.
The site I often use is a news collector, not a news producer.
Also, you tried to claim that the story about DeCaprio was false because some shitty "bias" checker said the source was evil but it turns out, that like most stories liberals hate, it was 100% true, and liberal sources didn't want to cover it until it got some traction. Now, even ultra-leftist, Obama-worshipping rags are covering the story.
