Bipartisan Committee Votes Unanimously to Investigate DFL Senator’s Role in Voter Fraud
And yet, when he's asked about it, he doesn't mention it.
Mueller's report and Schift don't seem to say the samething
So taking a look inside your old "excuses/arguments" hat, there appears to be only two left.
Nothing she did was any different from what MSM and bid tech did.
Just because the DOJ and FBI are dirty as fuck, doesn't change that fact.
Ok, so what we've got here:
(1) The crimes that person A commits are similar enough to crimes that person B commits, which then legitimizes person A's crimes as not really a problem for anyone.
(2) The criminal justice system is corrupt, which then legitimizes crimes commited by person's A and B because no one can be held accountable.
Have I accurately distilled your arguments? Please advise.
Looking at these, I love it! you've built yourself an ironclad argument.
In step one, you grant certain people immunity, because "others do it too"
Then, in step 2, after you've let everyone off with no consequences, you then have the audacity to sit back and say "well hey, none of these people are being punished.... so whats the point of the FBI to do anything, its all corrupt."
Its strikingly banal in its simplicity. An unmovable bowl of crap. How do you do it? Its fascinating
Ah, so you support a one-sided legal system.
Justice is supposed to be blind, not politically motivated.
The justice system you want is the same as we see under dictators.
Woohoo, pay attention. I'm the one talking about your most used arguments.
Justice systems, ummm you mentioned that. thats your argument. "the DOJ and FBI are dirty as fuck"
DOJ and FBI - dirty as fuck.
Whatever Trump, Guliani, ____ (insert name here) did which might have been bad....well, but Schiff, Pelosi, Clinton _____ (insert name here) did em too!
those are your two main arguments FOR ANYTHING. Right?
You are saying this content frm chick is a criminal based on what she has been accused of, by the DOJ/FBI.
I pointed out that MSM, big tech and the DNC have also done those things, but you don't want me talking about that.
I know you are a liberal, but I would have thought you would know that the justice system includes the DOJ and FBI.
You brought the justice system into this thread by bringing in the charges against the chick.
No no, I mentioned her, and when I did, you immediately tried to minimize her crimes (because shes russian aka authoritarian aka someone you would easily admire, and if she stole a 0.25 cent cigarillo and was shot she would be a modern day Joan of Arc in your eyes):
Watch as you minimize :
Just thinking about it, but do you think that she is worse than the MSM, who spent 4 years lying about Trump at every turn?
And you used one of your favorite go-to arguments to defend her (because you've only got a handful of em) "is she really as bad as _____ (fill in the blank)" aka, the "shes bad, hes bad, their all bad" argument.... "so if you pick on my Putin Princess Ima gonna throw MSM libs ____ in the frey" (insert standard raphjd-worldview villain) "and minimize cause that my (your) modus operandi"
Sensing you were going for your comfort circle of arguments, I then numbered them (like when driving out of town, and bored, some people point out and count how many out of state license plates they can spot) yada yada , and there we are.
LOL, says the guy who blatantly ignores your beloved MSM and bid tech doing the same thing.
If she was running a liberal content farm, you'd be worshipping her.
You want me to view her as evil while demanding I ignore MSM, big tech, and the DNC. If it's evil for one to do it, then it's evil for all to do it, but since you are a liberal you can't understand that.
When you say "you want me to ignore the MSM" is that your way of saying "whenever you bring up Trump, I want to also bring up my list of baddies just cause... gotta rep-rezent!?
Light comes on over my head....
I think I get it.
People bring up Trump, and cause you know the shit he done was baad ...and ....you dont got nothin to defend him... (here comes your anxiety at not being able to defend him) and all you got left is your little "minimizer-gun" that magically swats away Trump arguments. Poof! anxiety is lessened and raphjd feels better and more secure.
By god I think Ive got it!!!
You clowns love to bring up Trump in conversations that have nothing to do with him.
Until you can admit that your beloved MSM, big tech, and the DNC also committed the same crimes as this chick, then you are just a partisan hack who supports a corrupt legal system.
I know you won't admit it, because you are pathologically unable to.
@raphjd Well I said trump but really for you, its a mutable thing... its a standard conservatism vs liberal. Defending conservatives in todays climate is hard, and your not left with much to use. So you compare and minimize others, in order to feel better
You know raphjd, a lot of the arguments you make against MSM, if they were more sophisticated, you would see how often what you say, its true! MSM DOES deserve scrutiny and scorn.
Your saying "the MSM covers up shit" which, in more educated hands, would sound like "Mainstream Media Recirculation of Trust-Reducing Social Media Messages, and the Cultivation of Non-Redemptive Self-Schemata in Disadvantaged Minorities". There are real, substantial problems affecting MSM and its inescapable and often destructive influence over society
Ah, I have to use "big words" to please you. Clearly, you know my argument, but because I don't use big words, you ignore my argument.
That says a lot about you.
@Spintendo Unfortunately, with your bias against certain members of society, a lot of these arguments that are happening now in society about MSM, the change that you and others see is needed would have diametrically different solutions.
For example, your concern that the black mass shooter was getting less coverage in media, which is a VALID POINT, does not originate from some understanding of the plight of Blacks in America and how they are marginalized....... rather, I think you want more people to know cause perhaps you like the idea of people seeing more of their criminality. which if I'm right, is really kind of a sad sick thing to want. I'm almost certain, that is the part you would like best about raising "awareness". Its not concern FOR them, its the opposite.
The liberal agenda is to demonize white people, we see that every day on MSM.
The NYTimes hired openly anti-white racist Sarah Jeong to a senior position.
The Root is nothing but anti-white trash trying to pretend to be news.
The list is endless.
Dylann Roof further their agenda, while Emanuel Samson weakens their agenda.
It's like the Chicago kidnapping of the mentally disabled white teen by a group of black teens. The video is extremely clear that it was an anti-white hate crime but they were not charged for that.
It's like how in the UK women can not legally commit most sex crimes, then using the crime stats to say that sex crimes are rarely committed by women.
Israel says that women can not legally commit domestic violence. Not surprisingly, liberals like to use Israel to show that DV is a gendered issue.
The Duluth Model of DV says that even with extreme evidence against the woman, the man is to be removed (arrested). This is used to justify the lie that DV in the west is gendered.
Liberals have their agenda and will use anything, dishonestly, to further their agenda.
Once again, as AOC and others love to say; it's better to be morally right than factually right.
The 1619 Project rewrites history to suit their agenda.
Anti-racism is just anti-white racism.
You don't want me to focus on black criminality, but you don't mind focusing on white criminality to create a false narrative.
You people even change definitions of words to suit your agenda.
If a black person commits a crime, liberals label it as "white supremacy".
Likewise, when a woman commits a crime they blame the "patriarchy".
Liberals infantilize those they claim to love. You believe they have no agency, so therefore their criminal acts must be the fault of someone else.
bi4smooth last edited by
To your mind (what there is of one), IMPERFECT justice is no justice at all.
So long as you (and your ilk) are in charge... but wait... in charge? That's not anarchy!
Reminds me of the old one-liner: "when I'm elected King, I'll fix everything wrong with the USA!"
Thowing out a bunch of content-farm netted headlines
The NYTimes hired openly anti-white racist Sarah Jeong to a senior position!
The Root is nothing but anti-white trash trying to pretend to be news!
UK women can not legally commit most sex crimes, then using the crime stats to say that sex crimes are rarely committed by women!
Israel says that women can not legally commit domestic violence!
Your standard strategy is to compare ("everyone else does it") and minimize ("its no worse than others"), compare and minimize.... throwing out headlines, throw em everywhere like confetti.
A diet consisting purely of content farm-fed news headlines is living on scraps.