• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents

    SCOTUS bitch slaps Kamala

    Politics & Debate
    1
    2
    12
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • raphjd
      raphjd Forum Administrator last edited by

      While Kamala was California's AG, she insisted that non-profits provide her office detailed lists of their donors.

      In a 6-3 decision, the court ruled that the government, at any level, can not require "compelled disclosure" because it burdens the 1st Amendment.

      Part of the ruling was that California violated its own confidentiality laws when it published over 1,800 of these disclosures. SCOTUS took the view that this was clearly targeted punishment against people who donated to non-profits the state didn't like, as it was they did not publish all of the disclosures for all non-profits.

      raphjd 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • raphjd
        raphjd Forum Administrator @raphjd last edited by

        Clearly, I need to explain this.

        Kamala wanted to make this US law, but the SCOTUS bitch slapped that away.

        Maybe if she and California didn't use these disclosures for political purposes, the SCOTUS would have sided with her.

        Another example of Kamala violating laws she swore to uphold and enforce.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

        • 1 / 1
        • First post
          Last post