Man offer to debate a woman = catcalling
-
Ben Shapiro offered to debate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, in turn, said that men offering to debate women, without the woman's consent, is the same as catcalling. In other words, a man has to get a woman's permission first, before he can offer to debate her.
This is the rising star being paraded around by the left as their shining beacon for what the DNC is.
The left has seriously lost their fucking minds.
-
Also several months ago she was complaining that Rep. Joe Crowley was ignoring her when she asked for a debate. But she's so entitled that she felt the need to visit him in his office to ask him again!
So basically she catcalled then harassed him according to her own logic. And no progressives will call her toxic femininity out! :funny2: -
The catcalling comment was stupid but I am wondering this. Do candidates debate people that they are not running against? Why would she debate a twit like Shapiro.
If Bill Maher had asked Trump to debate in 2016 I think we all know what the answer would have been.
-
Well, she did graduate 4th in her class with her double majors of Economics and International Relations and she has massively failed on those topics in interviews.
She only does softball interviews, where she's never held accountable for her stupid ass claims.
This is why Ben Shapiro wants to debate her. Others from the right, including many women, have offered to debate her and she has refused.
She needs to drag her ass on to Fox and do a proper interview and maybe people won't insist she debate them.
I agree that a candidate normally won't debate someone who is not their opponent, but in the UK we have "leaders debates" at election time and it includes people who due to numbers could never, ever rule the UK like the nationalist parties over the various "countries". As an example, outside of Scotland, no one will vote for the SNP so they have zero chance of ruling the UK. Why are they included in the debates of potential leaders? Also, Nicola Sturgeon is the leader of Scotland, so she can't also rule the UK. It's a legal impossibility, so why is she included on that alone?!
-
Why would she waste her time on Fox? Fox viewers have little no education. They aren't going to vote for this woman.
-
No education?! LOL, you are funny.
She has a double degree in Economics and International Relations and graduated 4th in her class. She went to one of the best high schools in NYC and was given an award for being the best latino student in the school. Despite this, she has absolutely no clue about anything.
As far as not going to Fox, it's only due to them not giving her a free ride interview where they ignore all her screw-ups like we've been seeing on all of her interviews in the leftist media.
Anyone who watches MSM is a brain dead turd. We've discussed CNN's bullshit here many, many times, as well as many others.
