For being unbiased.. they sure are biased.
-
Two more examples of how biased supposedly unbiased internet entities are:
Long ago, Google generated complicated algorithms to measure what was most popular, most relevant, etc. It was very credible and useful. Google's databases became the framework of how the internet functions. But then.. they began SELLING popularity and leap-frogging irrelevant crap to the top of the heap when paid to do so.. making them, and everything that uses their databases to be dysfunctional garbage.
YouTube is similar… they used to provide quite entertaining, educational, and interesting clips. But, over time they began stuffing more and more ads that you are forced to watch in their videos.. even inserting them at various spots within the videos. Also.. they have a quasi-censorship in addition to their blatant censorship when they choose to monetize and demonetize various videos. A great example of that is this guy who spent over a decade creating original content posted exclusively on YouTube. He posted thousands of video clips, and made a good living at it because his channel was monetized.... but then.. he made the fatal error of criticizing liberals. With no warning, his videos were not only demonetized, but deleted.. along with his entire channel. Basically, over a decade of his work was purged forever in an instant with no warning. Imagine if they did that with email accounts.
