SUPREME Court affirms that Trump was right!

Frederick

Guess who got his travel ban? T R U M P!
They don't call it the SUPREME Court for nothing. Those moonbat courts don't me a thing.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/26/supreme-court-to-hear-trump-appeal-travel-ban-block.html

mhorndisk

It was also a 9-0 ruling. Not even one of the liberal SCOTUS judges sided with the phony idea that his ban was unconstitutional. Trump never even said anything about Islam as a religion or it's practices or attacked any of their beliefs. He was talking about extremists, period.

This was only bound to happen. Liberals lost the election, which included the executive and legislative branch, they lost the four special elections, and they might lose another liberal Supreme. The Russian narrative has collapsed, and they were the ones colluding. It has come out also that Hillary's popular vote was a fraud and that 1.5 million illegals stole social security numbers. Now the travel ban has been reinstated. The democrats are in disarray and full exposure for their criminal behavior. That's just the tip of the ice berg. It's over. You can make up all the fake news you want because it's just what you want to believe, but you are no match for the Truth, which is now turning into a tsunami.

Go ahead and cry all you want. We'll be here waiting for you to realize that you were wrong. It's only a matter of time.

pppucci

Let's be clear. SCOTUS has not yet ruled on the merits of the case.The 9-0 ruling hear the case on its merits in October.In the meantime, they allowed the ban to go into place, but only for those foreigners who do not have a direct relationship with an American resident or institution. Whjile this is clearly a partial victory for the administration, it would be premature to celebrate complete victory.

mhorndisk

Well, you are correct to a degree, however, it temporarily reversed the decision by the lower courts and showed that their rulings didn't hold water. If there were any actual merit to their lower rulings, it wouldn't have been a question. The fact that it's being temporarily and partially over ruled is a big win because not even one of the SCOTUS has agreed that it's as cut and dry as the liberals have tried to make it out to be. It certainly isn't unconstitutional, because if it were, it would be pretty clear, as the Constitution is clear.