Hillary taking 90% of Haiti Donations
-
A REMINDER: THIS SUBJECT IS HILLARY TAKING 20K FROM THE KKK and 90% of the HAITI DONATIONS FOR ADMINSTRATIVE COSTS, and CALLING MARGARET SANGER A HERO when she said, "BLACK PEOPLE ARE WEEDS." How can you honestly support someone that supports the likes of these people? It boggles my mind. And you wanna go into this crap about how Robert Byrd left the KKK and ignore all the other stuff as though that is an answer that deserves respect??? You must have lost your mind.
-
She's a horrible person and she DID take 90% of the donations to HAITI as "Administrative Costs." She did praise Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, who said "black people are weeds that need to be exterminated." How can you praise someone like that? You've gotta be out of your mind. You don't wanna answer those questions and instead actually just make a point by point about how Senator Byrd was ok after a while? Give me a break. Answer how she can actually take $20,000 from the KKK and not send it back or rebuke it? She took the money and you didn't have NOTHING to say about, just like you don't NOW. She's EVIL. Personified. And you are supporting her evil crap. When the KKK sends you money, you send it back, retard!
-
Robert Byrd was an exalted GRAND CYCLOPS of the KKK, and the fact that you're even defending Hillary for calling him her mentor and ignoring the quotes from Margaret Sanger about saying black people are weeds, and ignoring the fact that Hillary took money from the KKK without rebuking them is totally ridiculous and shameful. You need to get your facts straight and quit playing hypocritical word games.
I didn't ignore anything - I was addressing your statement re : Robert Byrd being a Grand Dragon (now changed, I see, thank-you for researching it :)) - the guy was 92 when he died - he left the KKK in 1952 - If you think I should hold her accountable for his lapse of judgement in a very different time period and 60 or so years ago then you are going to do the same with Trump.. deal? Because he said/did/associated with people that did some pretty awful things in the lat 40 years and longer and he exalted them too
re : Margaret Sanger: Clinton associated herself with a person who said some awful things ? ok. What should she do. Shoot her? Did she agree with her ? Did she stand next to her and cheer her on, did she repeat them and agree with them? Guilt by association is something a LOT of politicians could easily be found guilty of, including your beloved Trump, and is part of the job. Seems to me you are clutching at any dirt from any associate of hers then acting like she personally said/did these things. she didn't. Her taste in people may be a bit off and I agree with that but, again, thin argument.
When you argue such things it proves something, you are holding Clinton to a much higher standard than Trump.. which is kinda illogical since he is the president but - with you - he gets a free ride ? Why ? Does he not have accountability, same as everyone else?
If you were to scrutinise Trump as much as you scrutinise Clinton we would be reading pages of ranting - you need to understand this - HE WON !!! HE WON!! You act like he lost lol - but that is not the end - most people voted him in to to do certain things and if you were one of them then you need to start holding him accountable or you will get nothing
My "hypocritical word games"? you mean discussing things? Debunking Myths? Not agreeing with every single thing you say? This is me just stating opinions and answering your obvious single minded hate on someone that is really quite irrelevant these days.
I do not believe Clinton was/is an angel - but the way you make her out - with such obvious hate that is too extreme and therefore I responded..
Clinton & The Democrats denounced the KKK and its donation - it was 20k, was donated anonymously and noone can even prove it exists. Do you want to go through both parties donors? Because I am sure the lists would be very interesting on both sides - you are being very nitpicky then blowing things up
As for the Haiti thing - that is all hearsay and cannot be proven either, thanks to both sides bullshitting - noone knows exactly and if they do, they aren't saying because (like i'm trying to say over and over) if they can prove it then The Republicans and their foundations will get same scrutiny and even you know that could get messy LOL - see they know that accountability is a two edged sword
Anyway - i've written enough for 1 post lol
-
But regardless, you bitches are continually disregarding the issue at hand, the subject matter, that Hillary did in fact take 90% of the donations to Haiti as administrative costs. You wanna talk all about other crap, but the facts are the facts. She did, and you can't deny it. Don't give me your crap, because you're embarrassing humanity in the process.
False. This lie was debunked long ago, but people addicted to hate propaganda websites keep repeating it over and over.
Many celebrities have vanity charities. They raise money for them, and then distribute the funds to other charities that actually do the work.
Some right-wing morons latched onto the fact that the Clinton Foundation does NOT distribute very much to other charities, and, as usual, they went ballistic.
Oh, no, the Clintons must be stealing from the poor and disadvantaged!
In reality, the Clinton Foundation does not distribute to other charities because THEY ACTUALLY DO THE WORK. They build schools and clinics.
Th Trump Foundation, on the other hand, has taken money that was supposed to go to disabled Veterans and used it for his presidential campaign!
-
VP debate: Mike Pence said: "The Trump Organization gives 100% of it's donations, the Clinton Foundation gives ten cents on the dollar." And Tim Caine just changed the subject and refused to deny it. Because it's a fact. The Clinton Foundation is extraordinarily corrupt and it serves gay people no justice to support them.
Utter BULLSHIT. The numbers are public.
https://www.charitywatch.org/ratings-and-metrics/bill-hillary-chelsea-clinton-foundation/478 -
I don't need to provide proof to you. That's all you fucking bitches ever ask for is some sort of reference, but even the reference don't matter when they speak 17 languages. You're a dumb bitch and I'm right so you prove I'm wrong.
Actually you do.. you are the one directing "facts" at us - burden of proof is on you
-
How is this thread still a thing. We debunked the whole Haiti thing in previous posts. I personally explained in earlier post the whole haiti thing. You can google it yourself and be sure to seek sourced based information. Pne man made the whole haiti claim and it was found to have no bearing in reality. Hillary did at one time criticize black males and call them such. She, unlike Trump, apologized for her position. Trump was fined from the casino commission for discrimination when he removed women and blacks fro his tables because a mobster named Libutti didn't like them. Trump railed against 5 black and latino kinds for rape in 1989 that were later exonerated when dna test and a confession proved they were innocent. Trump continues to this day to accuse them of the crime despite evidence. Many staffers have testified that whenever Trump visited the towers they were usher to back during dinner parties because they were not classy enough. The list just keeps going on and on but Trump supporters do not care about questionable behavior unless it is a liberal. 90% of the things that Trumpkins despise about Hillary has been debunked or exaggerated.
-
I think we've made our point, and clearly given well thought out responses to all the things they have spewed at us.
Some people will cling to their beliefs beyond all reason- and because of that, it becomes pointless to continue to engage, at least until the next big lie or falsehood they throw out which needs to be answered.
If they have no proof for their side, then it's just empty rhetoric and alt-facts. Nothing more to see here. -
Old news… Clinton is a stupid cunt.
