College creates a "safe space" where students can be free from white people
-
Claremont McKenna College creates a "safe space" where students can be free from white people
Remember, we're told that SJWs don't really exist. :crazy2:
There's plenty more stories like this.
-
This is insane.
And I agree with the channel host. What if I'm White + Hispanic? Where do I belong to? What about people with White and Black parents? Will those with both Black parents regard them as lesser persons? Tainted persons?
I always knew all those multiracial/multicultural relationships tv tries to shove down our throats indeed looked way too advanced for the era we live in.
-
-
I hope you realize that posting that link helps me, not you.
-
I hope you realize that posting that link helps me, not you.
And indeed it does. Such venom-filled statements and one of those girls having the nerve of calling them 'healthy discussions'. That FB group doesn't even deserve the right to be called a 'Safe Space'.
The girl saying her white stepfather makes jokes at her expense is troubling though…but if someone cared enough to adopt a child that is not theirs, let alone of their same race, I highly doubt they would even dare to make hurtful jokes about them. My only guess regarding that girl is that her SJW identity has overwhelmed her sensibilities and now EVERYTHING her white father says is a direct insult to her,always a joke at her expense.
Then we had that 'RobinPollack' SJW, who got wrecked by the other commenters. On of the replies of such men 'Ben Michaels' hit the nail:
"...creating an echo chamber where much of the rhetoric is spiteful, belittling, and self-righteous doesn’t make people feel better, it doesn’t help them cope with problems, and it doesn’t create a positive path forward for dealing with problems. It makes people feel worse, not better."
Not to mention the part where he pointed the fact that some 'Safe Groups' become platforms for bigoted rhetoric.
-
I hope you realize that posting that link helps me, not you.
And indeed it does. Such venom-filled statements and one of those girls having the nerve of calling them 'healthy discussions'. That FB group doesn't even deserve the right to be called a 'Safe Space'.
The girl saying her white stepfather makes jokes at her expense is troubling though…but if someone cared enough to adopt a child that is not theirs, let alone of their same race, I highly doubt they would even dare to make hurtful jokes about them. My only guess regarding that girl is that her SJW identity has overwhelmed her sensibilities and now EVERYTHING her white father says is a direct insult to her,always a joke at her expense.
Then we had that 'RobinPollack' SJW, who got wrecked by the other commenters. On of the replies of such men 'Ben Michaels' hit the nail:
"...creating an echo chamber where much of the rhetoric is spiteful, belittling, and self-righteous doesn’t make people feel better, it doesn’t help them cope with problems, and it doesn’t create a positive path forward for dealing with problems. It makes people feel worse, not better."
Not to mention the part where he pointed the fact that some 'Safe Groups' become platforms for bigoted rhetoric.
What do you mean it 'helps' me? A stupid and racist thing was stopped in a college because people realized how dumb it was. Are the SJWS part of the college now and are masterminding this to make it look like they're not SJWS? Is that how far it goes??
-
It shows what SJWs are like. SJWs are always like this.
YES, a few colleges are finally growing some balls and standing up to the SJWs. SO WHAT?! It doesn't mean that SJWs don't actually exist as you want everyone to believe.
-
It doesn't mean that SJWs don't actually exist as you want everyone to believe.
I have never said these words.
-
It doesn't mean that SJWs don't actually exist as you want everyone to believe.
I have never said these words.
True, you just want people to believe that there are like 3 SJWs in the entire world. OR that the extreme right are just labelling everyone we hate and want to violently murder, an SJW.
You would have more crediblity if you just admitted that they exist and they have an effect on what is going on around us. You claim that they only exist on the internet shows that you are insane or dishonest.
The white kids art Berkeley saw first hand the SJWs who you claim only exist on the internet. They got their shoes wet crossing the creek because of internet memes blocked the bridge. They couldn't study because of internet meme protesting through the college.
-
It doesn't mean that SJWs don't actually exist as you want everyone to believe.
I have never said these words.
True, you just want people to believe that there are like 3 SJWs in the entire world.
Why do you keep saying things that I have never said? You are arguing against someone that isn't me.
You would have more crediblity if you just admitted that they exist and they have an effect on what is going on around us. You claim that they only exist on the internet shows that you are insane or dishonest.
Again. Things I haven't said. I said I hear more about SJWS on the internet than seing htem in real life.
-
I live in Scotland. I see more Americans on the internet than I do in real life. Therefore, things that happen in America have no effect on the rest of the world, including who is elected President. See how that doesn't make sense?
Internet SJW feminists get to talk at the UN. They wanted to criminalize as "violence" calling someone stupid or a liar on the internet.
Jessica Valenti (columnist @ The Guardian), UN Women and many others say that equality harms women, so women need to be lifted above men.
Obama and Hillary make SJW feminist claims, despite official US government stats proving them wrong. Many, many politicians are guilty of this. I have only ever seen these people on the internet or TV, so clearly they have no efffect on the greater society.
I've only ever seen Justin Trudeau on the internet, but as Canada's PM, he has affected his entire country by chosing his cabinet members based on their genitals, not experience or merit.
Politicians, despite official stats saying otherwise, keep claiming that cops are killing black people at a rate higher than any other race.
Univesrities routinely pander to SJWs. If you live in a college town yo will proably see it, but if you live in the middle of nowhere, then you won't.
-
I live in Scotland. I see more Americans on the internet than I do in real life. Therefore, things that happen in America have no effect on the rest of the world, including who is elected President. See how that doesn't make sense?
Internet SJW feminists get to talk at the UN. They wanted to criminalize as "violence" calling someone stupid or a liar on the internet.
Jessica Valenti (columnist @ The Guardian), UN Women and many others say that equality harms women, so women need to be lifted above men.
Obama and Hillary make SJW feminist claims, despite official US government stats proving them wrong. Many, many politicians are guilty of this. I have only ever seen these people on the internet or TV, so clearly they have no efffect on the greater society.
I've only ever seen Justin Trudeau on the internet, but as Canada's PM, he has affected his entire country by chosing his cabinet members based on their genitals, not experience or merit.
Politicians, despite official stats saying otherwise, keep claiming that cops are killing black people at a rate higher than any other race.
Univesrities routinely pander to SJWs. If you live in a college town yo will proably see it, but if you live in the middle of nowhere, then you won't.
False equivalency. SJWs are supposed to be everywhere in the west. You wouldn't expect to see Americans in Scotland, but the internet makes i seem hat you should be seeing SJWs everywhere.
All your other statements are honestly very misleading and you provide zero sources and also have nothing to do with this post about a college safe space.
How about you talk about conservative students wanting to sue teachers because of what the opinions the express? Don't they need a safe space?
You see how ridiculous this is? Wouldn't they be SJWs? You're definition of SJW is so loose and basically looks like you call anyone who doesn't agree with you an SJW.
-
Do you lot ever give up
-
I live in Scotland. I see more Americans on the internet than I do in real life. Therefore, things that happen in America have no effect on the rest of the world, including who is elected President. See how that doesn't make sense?
Internet SJW feminists get to talk at the UN. They wanted to criminalize as "violence" calling someone stupid or a liar on the internet.
Jessica Valenti (columnist @ The Guardian), UN Women and many others say that equality harms women, so women need to be lifted above men.
Obama and Hillary make SJW feminist claims, despite official US government stats proving them wrong. Many, many politicians are guilty of this. I have only ever seen these people on the internet or TV, so clearly they have no efffect on the greater society.
I've only ever seen Justin Trudeau on the internet, but as Canada's PM, he has affected his entire country by chosing his cabinet members based on their genitals, not experience or merit.
Politicians, despite official stats saying otherwise, keep claiming that cops are killing black people at a rate higher than any other race.
Univesrities routinely pander to SJWs. If you live in a college town yo will proably see it, but if you live in the middle of nowhere, then you won't.
False equivalency. SJWs are supposed to be everywhere in the west. You wouldn't expect to see Americans in Scotland, but the internet makes i seem hat you should be seeing SJWs everywhere.
All your other statements are honestly very misleading and you provide zero sources and also have nothing to do with this post about a college safe space.
How about you talk about conservative students wanting to sue teachers because of what the opinions the express? Don't they need a safe space?
You see how ridiculous this is? Wouldn't they be SJWs? You're definition of SJW is so loose and basically looks like you call anyone who doesn't agree with you an SJW.
NOPE. I only ever see Americans on the internet or TV, so they must not exist in real life. It's the same thing you say about SJWs.
Umm, how f'ing lazy are you?
It's stuff like this that proves you either have absolutely no clue what is going on in the world or you live in an echo chamber.
Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn spoke at the UN. That info isn't that hard to find out, nor is it hard to find video of them speaking there.
UN Women isn't a secret organization. It's easy to find stuff from them. Notice in your search that there is no UN Men, because well gender equality.
Jessica Valenti is a "journalist" and not hard to find info about.
The US Department of Labor and the FBI crime stats prove the gender wage gap and feminist rape stats are lies.
The fact that you don't know about any of this shows you are either extremely clueless or you agree with them so it just blows by you without you noticing.
So, when talking about college safe spaces, we can't talk about SJWs. Is that what you are saying?! It does fit with your attempts to remove SJWs from the real world.
Ok, lets talk about that Professor.
She said that half of voting Americans committed TERRORISM and ASSAULT on the US, because they voted for someone she doesn't like. Her anti-Trump rant had nothing to do with the coursework she was lecturing about.
There isn't a lawsuit, just a complaint to the head of the college.
Ironically, Rob Schneiderman, president of the Coast Federation of Educators/American Federation of Teachers Local 1911 that represents Cox, said he wanted to make it so professors and STUDENTS can have free speech on campus. So that is the opposite of college "safe spaces".
The funny thing is, this article doesn't mention any of the cases where conservative Professors get in trouble for things they say; like the one who said he was against abortion but it's legal, in a lecture about how personal morals and the law don't always match.
Lets not gloss over the fact that the article is quite biased to the hard left.
-
Do you lot ever give up
Are you still here whining about a topic you claim you aren't interested in?
BTW, when you report me, you report me to me. DUH!!!! The fact that you have only been targeting me, shows you are an SJW who can't stand up to his convictions. Instead of insisting we shut down topics you don't like, just ignore them.
-
Claremont McKenna College creates a "safe space" where students can be free from white people
So far these 'safe spaces' have included such highly trafficked areas of Claremont as the Motley Coffeehouse sitting room and ASCMC's office annex.
I think barring white students from at least two locations that 40% of them have probably never heard of/or been to just might be a restriction they can live with.
-
That's why Trump got elected.
-
So far these 'safe spaces' have included such highly trafficked areas of Claremont as the Motley Coffeehouse sitting room and ASCMC's office annex.
I think barring white students from at least two locations that 40% of them have probably never heard of/or been to just might be a restriction they can live with.
But Spintendo…that's not the real problem, the problem is that this so called 'safe spaces' can be used as nests to hatch hate propaganda. We are talking about minorities (race, sex) that are claiming spaces to be free of white people (or basically any other person who doesn't cater to their exclusive group demographic) because they see them as an enemy (which ironically has pandered to them so much that they're are actually able to this this kind of crazy things. Let the hate speech pump them to the point were they will enact it outside of their 'safe space'.
Even worse we talk about those spaces funded by colleges with the money of ALL contributors (all the sexes , all the races).
-
I live in Scotland. I see more Americans on the internet than I do in real life. Therefore, things that happen in America have no effect on the rest of the world, including who is elected President. See how that doesn't make sense?
Internet SJW feminists get to talk at the UN. They wanted to criminalize as "violence" calling someone stupid or a liar on the internet.
Jessica Valenti (columnist @ The Guardian), UN Women and many others say that equality harms women, so women need to be lifted above men.
Obama and Hillary make SJW feminist claims, despite official US government stats proving them wrong. Many, many politicians are guilty of this. I have only ever seen these people on the internet or TV, so clearly they have no efffect on the greater society.
I've only ever seen Justin Trudeau on the internet, but as Canada's PM, he has affected his entire country by chosing his cabinet members based on their genitals, not experience or merit.
Politicians, despite official stats saying otherwise, keep claiming that cops are killing black people at a rate higher than any other race.
Univesrities routinely pander to SJWs. If you live in a college town yo will proably see it, but if you live in the middle of nowhere, then you won't.
False equivalency. SJWs are supposed to be everywhere in the west. You wouldn't expect to see Americans in Scotland, but the internet makes i seem hat you should be seeing SJWs everywhere.
All your other statements are honestly very misleading and you provide zero sources and also have nothing to do with this post about a college safe space.
How about you talk about conservative students wanting to sue teachers because of what the opinions the express? Don't they need a safe space?
You see how ridiculous this is? Wouldn't they be SJWs? You're definition of SJW is so loose and basically looks like you call anyone who doesn't agree with you an SJW.
NOPE. I only ever see Americans on the internet or TV, so they must not exist in real life. It's the same thing you say about SJWs.
Umm, how f'ing lazy are you?
No isn't the same thing. A country of people =/= SJWs. Are you serious?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence
"A common way for this fallacy to be perpetuated is one shared trait between two subjects is assumed to show equivalence, especially in order of magnitude, when equivalence is not necessarily the logical result. False equivalence is a common result when an anecdotal similarity is pointed out as equal, but the claim of equivalence doesn't bear because the similarity is based on oversimplification or ignorance of additional factors. The pattern of the fallacy is often as such: "If A is the set of c and d, and B is the set of d and e, then since they both contain d, A and B are equal". d is not required to exist in both sets; only a passing similarity is required to cause this fallacy to be able to be used."
-
Who cares? Whites have had a safe space in this country for 240 years…
