RuPaul Judge Lucian Piane: Trump Is More Trustworthy than Hillary.
-
ok back up a bit, I mean where did your anger against feminists stem from?
Where did you get all this info from and why do you believe it?
I ask you to go and have a look at all the good feminism has done for us as a society and of course like all movements it has its criticisms and people who use it for their own advantage -
:police: Be careful about calling people trolls. :police:
As a feminist, you can't debunk anything I have said, nor can you show anything that feminism has done to benefit men. The only thing you have is name calling.
Feminists brag about how great feminism is for society, yet when questioned, they have nothing. The only thing we can take from that is that they are either liars or delusional.
Feminists need to distort history to justify their existence.
Susan B Anthony was an extreme racist but you wouldn't know it if you listened to feminists, despite her speeches being readily available on the internet.
Emmeline Pankhurst, her daughters, and their group were man-haters and elitists. Not only are they responsible for the draft of all men who could not vote (mostly due to not owning property), they were also responsible for the evil known as the White Feather.
Feminists gave us the Society for Cutting Up Men (SCUM) manifesto.
Feminists have taken Due Process away from men when accused of sexual assault on college campuses.
Feminists have redefined what rape and sexual assault is, especially on college campuses is. If a guy and girl are equally drunk and have sex, only the guy is guilty of rape. If a guy says he doesn't want to be in a sexless relationship, it's rape. If a guy says he's the son of a billionaire to get sex, it's rape, never mind the gold digger's motives.
In the UK, if your wife has a baby, it's automatically yours, even if it comes out a different race. If you want a paternity test, you have to get your wife's permission. If she says NO, then you have to go to court where you lose the rights to the kid, but not the responsibilities. This whether or not the judge agrees with you.
In virtually all of the west, women can put the "baby daddy's" name on the birth certificate without his permission or knowledge. Fighting a paternity case is extremely expensive and time-consuming with the courts favoring the woman. Even when it's proven that a woman knowingly lied about the child's paternity, she rarely ever has to repay the child support she fraudulently got, let alone get in any legal trouble for filing a false document.
Feminists don't care about women not making up 52.8% (women's portion of the global population) in the shitty jobs. Oh NO, they only care about the good jobs.
Feminists don't like job titles that are male-gendered, yet they remain quiet about job titles that are female-gendered such as nursing in the UK.
Feminists only care about genital mutilation when it happens to girls, but don't give a damned when it happens to boys.
70% of one-sided domestic violence is by the woman. We have Germany and Harvard to thank for finding that out.
Couples with the highest rate of domestic violence is lesbian couples, then hetero and then gay.
Look at how feminists treated Erin Pizzey, who opened the world's first domestic violence shelter for women.
It's never ok to hit a woman, but it's 100% acceptable for women to hit men, especially according to women. Hypocrite much?!
As I always say, the list is never ending.
And I'm still waiting for feminists to debunk me, not just the usual name calling.
-
ok back up a bit, I mean where did your anger against feminists stem from?
Where did you get all this info from and why do you believe it?
I ask you to go and have a look at all the good feminism has done for us as a society and of course like all movements it has its criticisms and people who use it for their own advantageI hate feminism because of feminism/feminists.
Umm, the info comes from various sources depending on the specific bit we're talking about. Harvard is more trustworthy than any feminist. Even when the feminist Labour Party, under Tony Blair was in charge, the official government stats proved that domestic violence isn't as one sided as feminists demand that we believe.
Are you saying that a guy in WW1 who gets half his face blown off isn't the real victim of war, compared to the laughing and joking women at home playing football and such? There's plenty of proof that men are the true victims of war, regardless of what Hillary and other feminists say. Hell, war animals are bigger victims of war than women.
I have spent the last 30 years debating feminism and feminists never give any real evidence, just buzzwords and purposely misleading stats.
Feminists frequently edit sites like Wikipedia, as part of their gender studies courses, to whitewash feminists and feminism. Why can't feminists own the fact that Susan B Anthony was an extreme racist and elitist?! Why can't feminists own the fact that Emmeline Pankhurst, her daughters, and their group were man-hating, elitists? Why can't feminists own the fact that the male-only draft came about because of Emmeline Pankhurst and her group?! Why can't feminists own the evilness of the White feather campaign?
Feminism brought us gendered politics. The UK Parliament has 13 days a year (1 day per month and International Women's Day) to discuss only women's issues. There is no day to discuss men only issues.
Feminism brought us inequality in medical funding.
Feminism brought us inequality in social issue funding.
Feminism brought us the UK judiciary who actively violate the law of the land by treating women extremely lenient in all areas of court proceedings, especially in sentencing. The Bench Book (official UK judges' rule book) quotes feminist Supreme Court Justice, Baroness Hale's justifications for not obeying the equality laws. Off the top of my head, I don't remember the name of the feminist judge who is in charge of the group that makes the annual Bench Book.
There's a study that shows that if UK men were treated as softly as women are in the criminal courts, the UK male prison population would be 14% of it's current rate. Not a peep out of feminists.
Spreading out on public transport has always been an issue, but feminists ignored the true problem of women spreading out over several seats with their bags and even their feet. So they made it a man-hating gendered issue while ignoring that both sides do it.
Feminists keep creating gendered issues, such as "man-splaining", "man-slamming" and all manner of bullshit, that if looked at honestly is not a gendered issue.
Feminists brought us and demand we keep using the Duluth Model of domestic violence that says that unless there is extreme evidence to the contrary, the man is always guilty. Even if there is extreme evidence to show the woman is guilty, it's always best to remove the man, even if that means falsely arresting him. Feminists lose their minds if anyone suggests we go to a purely evidence based system.
Feminists scream that objectifying women is evil, while claiming that objectifying men empowers women.
You will never hear feminists screaming that women only make up 4% of the mining industry, less than 1% if you exclude those in admin jobs.
You will never hear a peep out of feminists that not a single street sweeper or trash collector in Aberdeen is a woman.
You will never hear a peep out of feminists about how Affirmative Action harms men in college admissions and other areas. Hell, uber-feminist Sweden ended AA because it started to help men. You can't have that.
-
:police: Be careful about calling people trolls. :police:
Yeah. Mmmhmmm. When you two nearly identical posts in one thread, it means you are a troll. It means all you care to do is speak in bumper sticker slogans, and have no thought process of your own. Hence why you didn't actually respond to me. You just parrot stuff you read on some idiotic MRA reddit thread, as opposed to addressing anything I brought up.
-
:police: You are violating our forum rules, by repeatedly calling me a troll. :police:
Those are my posts, whether you like it or not. And like I said before, you can't debunk what I said, so you are only left with name calling.
I responded to your comments by posting my rebuttal with facts. If you are not willing to have a proper respectful conversation, then do not reply.
:police: You can disagree with me and have a civil discussion and there is no problem. If all you have is name calling, then you are risking being muted on the forums. :police:
-
:police: You are violating our forum rules, by repeatedly calling me a troll. :police:
Care to show me where, considering it isn't in your posted rules? It also seems quite a little self serving, might I ask just how often you are accused of trolling?
Those are my posts, whether you like it or not. And like I said before, you can't debunk what I said, so you are only left with name calling.
Okay fine. Let's play the debunk game. You said, "Feminists have taken Due Process away from men when accused of sexual assault on college campuses." Due process is fairly specific to the US, and pertains to US laws. College campuses don't pass laws, so they can't actually infringe upon due process. What college campuses do is have policies, which are enacted through various bureaucratic processes. Of course then you have to acknowledge that each college is its own unique institution with its own unique set of policies, and massive variation between them. And since you didn't actually name a college, we can't actually look up what its policies actually are. So what you actually mean is, "Some college boards/presidents/administrators have enacted policies that _feel are unfairly biased in favor of the victims of sexual assault." Which is a very, very, very long way from your initial statement.
I responded to your comments by posting my rebuttal with facts. If you are not willing to have a proper respectful conversation, then do not reply.
:police: You can disagree with me and have a civil discussion and there is no problem. If all you have is name calling, then you are risking being muted on the forums. :police:
Actually you didn't. Note again that you didn't actually name a college. And if you at everything else you have posted, it is similarly long on claims, short of facts to actually examine._
-
You really are pushing it. Name calling is against the rules. Only by you and one other person, both about feminism. I'm only a troll when it comes to my views on feminism. Hmmmm.
UMM, I don't have to name a single US college since it's all based on the "Dear Colleague" letter of 2011 from the US Department of Education.
Actually, I did post facts that can be verified with a little bit of effort. Of course if you are only looking at Tumbler and MTV Decoded, then you won't find it. You can easily google "man-spreading", "man-splaining" and the like.
You can watch YouTube videos of various debates on the topics. YouTube has a lot of great videos on the topic and many of them are well sourced. If you're lucky, you might even find my channel.
I'm not surprised that you can't name anything that feminism has done to benefit men directly, because there is nothing. I willl give you a hand though. The campaign RAPE IS RAPE got man on man rape to be recorded by the FBI. HOWEVER, they still insist that women can not rape men. So while they did a bit of good, they still played the gender bias card.
-
:police: You are violating our forum rules, by repeatedly calling me a troll. :police:
Care to show me where, considering it isn't in your posted rules? It also seems quite a little self serving, might I ask just how often you are accused of trolling?
Those are my posts, whether you like it or not. And like I said before, you can't debunk what I said, so you are only left with name calling.
Okay fine. Let's play the debunk game. You said, "Feminists have taken Due Process away from men when accused of sexual assault on college campuses." Due process is fairly specific to the US, and pertains to US laws. College campuses don't pass laws, so they can't actually infringe upon due process. What college campuses do is have policies, which are enacted through various bureaucratic processes. Of course then you have to acknowledge that each college is its own unique institution with its own unique set of policies, and massive variation between them. And since you didn't actually name a college, we can't actually look up what its policies actually are. So what you actually mean is, "Some college boards/presidents/administrators have enacted policies that _feel are unfairly biased in favor of the victims of sexual assault." Which is a very, very, very long way from your initial statement.
I responded to your comments by posting my rebuttal with facts. If you are not willing to have a proper respectful conversation, then do not reply.
:police: You can disagree with me and have a civil discussion and there is no problem. If all you have is name calling, then you are risking being muted on the forums. :police:
Actually you didn't. Note again that you didn't actually name a college. And if you at everything else you have posted, it is similarly long on claims, short of facts to actually examine.
These people are professional victims. There's no use trying to reason with them. They jack themselves sore to crazy feminists on tumblr each night to confirm their worldview. There's nothing you can do to help._
-
The things I posted about are not crazy Tumbler feminists, unless you think one of the UK's Supreme Court Justices, Baroness Hale is a crazy Tumbler feminist.
Before saying such things, maybe you should actually read what I posted.
Thank you, though, because you are helping prove my point about feminists/SJWs.
-
:police: You are violating our forum rules, by repeatedly calling me a troll. :police:
Care to show me where, considering it isn't in your posted rules? It also seems quite a little self serving, might I ask just how often you are accused of trolling?
Those are my posts, whether you like it or not. And like I said before, you can't debunk what I said, so you are only left with name calling.
Okay fine. Let's play the debunk game. You said, "Feminists have taken Due Process away from men when accused of sexual assault on college campuses." Due process is fairly specific to the US, and pertains to US laws. College campuses don't pass laws, so they can't actually infringe upon due process. What college campuses do is have policies, which are enacted through various bureaucratic processes. Of course then you have to acknowledge that each college is its own unique institution with its own unique set of policies, and massive variation between them. And since you didn't actually name a college, we can't actually look up what its policies actually are. So what you actually mean is, "Some college boards/presidents/administrators have enacted policies that _feel are unfairly biased in favor of the victims of sexual assault." Which is a very, very, very long way from your initial statement.
I responded to your comments by posting my rebuttal with facts. If you are not willing to have a proper respectful conversation, then do not reply.
:police: You can disagree with me and have a civil discussion and there is no problem. If all you have is name calling, then you are risking being muted on the forums. :police:
Actually you didn't. Note again that you didn't actually name a college. And if you at everything else you have posted, it is similarly long on claims, short of facts to actually examine.
These people are professional victims. There's no use trying to reason with them. They jack themselves sore to crazy feminists on tumblr each night to confirm their worldview. There's nothing you can do to help.
LOL. How sad are you?
Again, another feminist who can't debunk a single thing I said so it's the well worn name calling. _
