New Law Makes North Carolina a Pioneer in Bigotry
-
Transgender Law Makes North Carolina Pioneer in Bigotry
by the Editorial Board of The New York Times
March 25, 2016Officials in Charlotte, N.C., spent more than a year carefully considering and debating an antidiscrimination ordinance that was passed in February to promote the city’s culture of inclusiveness. State lawmakers quashed it on Wednesday by passing an appalling, unconstitutional bill that bars transgender people from using public restrooms that match their gender identity and prohibits cities from passing antidiscrimination ordinances that protect gay and transgender people.
Gov. Pat McCrory, who signed the bill into law late Wednesday, said it was necessary to undo Charlotte’s ordinance, which included protections for gay and transgender people, because it allowed “men to use women’s bathroom/locker room.” Proponents of so-called bathroom bills, which have been introduced in state legislatures across the country, have peddled them by spuriously portraying transgender women as potential rapists. Supporters of the measures have been unable to point to a single case that justifies the need to legislate where people should be allowed to use the toilet. North Carolina is the first state to pass such a provision.
Under the law, people are required to use public restrooms that match the gender on their birth certificate. Transgender people in the state can request to have their birth certificate changed only if they have had gender reassignment surgery. Many transgender people cannot afford surgery or choose not to have it. By promoting the idea that transgender women are inherently dangerous, the law endangers citizens who are already disproportionately vulnerable to violence and stigmatization.
Transgender men go largely unmentioned in bathroom bill debates, but that could change. James Parker Sheffield, a transgender man with a beard, exposed the foolishness of the law in a tweet to the governor. “It’s now the law for me to share a restroom with your wife,” he wrote, attaching a photo of himself.
North Carolina can expect a backlash from leading employers, a potential cut in federal education funding and lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the law. American Airlines, which has a hub in Charlotte, and PayPal, which recently announced it would create 400 jobs in the state, are among several companies that have already criticized the law.
-
That is REALLY messed up! I live in NC and I need to get the HELL outta here! I feel the bigotry daily! (I'm not trans though)
-
Transgender Law Makes North Carolina Pioneer in Bigotry
by the Editorial Board of The New York Times
March 25, 2016Officials in Charlotte, N.C., spent more than a year carefully considering and debating an antidiscrimination ordinance that was passed in February to promote the city’s culture of inclusiveness. State lawmakers quashed it on Wednesday by passing an appalling, unconstitutional bill that bars transgender people from using public restrooms that match their gender identity and prohibits cities from passing antidiscrimination ordinances that protect gay and transgender people.
Gov. Pat McCrory, who signed the bill into law late Wednesday, said it was necessary to undo Charlotte’s ordinance, which included protections for gay and transgender people, because it allowed “men to use women’s bathroom/locker room.” Proponents of so-called bathroom bills, which have been introduced in state legislatures across the country, have peddled them by spuriously portraying transgender women as potential rapists. Supporters of the measures have been unable to point to a single case that justifies the need to legislate where people should be allowed to use the toilet. North Carolina is the first state to pass such a provision.
Under the law, people are required to use public restrooms that match the gender on their birth certificate. Transgender people in the state can request to have their birth certificate changed only if they have had gender reassignment surgery. Many transgender people cannot afford surgery or choose not to have it. By promoting the idea that transgender women are inherently dangerous, the law endangers citizens who are already disproportionately vulnerable to violence and stigmatization.
Transgender men go largely unmentioned in bathroom bill debates, but that could change. James Parker Sheffield, a transgender man with a beard, exposed the foolishness of the law in a tweet to the governor. “It’s now the law for me to share a restroom with your wife,” he wrote, attaching a photo of himself.
North Carolina can expect a backlash from leading employers, a potential cut in federal education funding and lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the law. American Airlines, which has a hub in Charlotte, and PayPal, which recently announced it would create 400 jobs in the state, are among several companies that have already criticized the law.
I agree with the straight people. Most women do not want transgendered women (who were born male) in their locker rooms.
I think sometimes gays and transgendered like to think they're one of the girls…but a lot of straight women don't see it that way and don't like the presumption.
-
This is obviously a difficult issue, it isn't clear cut at all imho
-
Most women do not want transgendered women (who were born male) in their locker rooms.
If they thought sharing with trans women was bad, just wait till they have to share with trans men (born female) — which the law now requires them to do.
Those women who didn't want to share bathrooms with men, will now be forced to do exactly that.
That's classical irony, in all its splendor.
-
that protect gay and transgender people.
What "gays " have anything to do with theses transgender problems..???
-
from my understanding there are about 24 states with laws such as this
-
What "gays " have anything to do with theses transgender problems
Because there can be uncertainty regarding a person's own standing within their particular group, status comparisons with other in-groups and out-groups can take place, motivated by a search upwards, downwards, or sideways.
Not understanding the discrimination that Trans people experience and how this could relate to the discrimination Gay people experience indicates that in your search, you more easily identify up, rather than down. I would suggest a more sideways approach.
24 states with laws such as this
There is only one entire state with this type of law. Six other states have proposed similar bills: Nevada and Texas had theirs [desc=A decision by a committee's legislators not to act on a bill, which effectively "kills" it just as would voting against it in the full legislature]die in committee[/desc]; Wisconsin's was revised to mandate separate, gender neutral bathrooms; South Dakota's was vetoed by its governor; Arizona's was withdrawn by the bill's sponsor; and Tennessee is still considering theirs in the legislature.
-
The can of worms has now opened, offically
