• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents

    Hi-res audio worth of it?

    Music
    1
    1
    849
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      charrotoro last edited by

      Hey there guys, it's two years since i deleted all my MP3 files and became a FLAC fan, mostly of my music is standard CD quality (16 bits 44.1KHz sampling rate) i have like 44 albums that are in the so-called HRA (Hi-resolution audio) which is 24-bit and from 44.1 to 192KHz, most stores sell 88.2 or 96KHz.

      I do hear a small difference with small works f.e piano solo or a sonata with viola da gamba and Harpsichord, but on a big-scale work like a symphonic or a choral work yes is pretty noticiable, but i think that a well recorded and mastered Compact disc sounds as good as 24-bit music.

      So personally i think is worth with big works but the file size of 1.40GB approximate is like what happened with wave nad mp3 in the 90's, i have a 2TB hard drive which are cheaper than flash storage. But overall i am torn if HRA is worth or not

      I am not an audiophile, more of a music lover, so i like my music sounds as close to reality and witha  sony walkman A10-series it does even with standard CD files.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

      • 1 / 1
      • First post
        Last post