Issues With what's being put in "Voyeur" and "Softcore" Categories
-
I've noticed a trend over the last year or so of things being put into "Softcore" or "Voyeur" that simply do not under any circumstances belong there. Since these are my two favorite categories, it's a little frustrating.
An example of something being mis-sorted into "voyeur" are the "Czech Hunter" series. These are cheaply but fully produced porn videos. They are nothing more than men having sex, often staged in a 'public' area, but none-the-less no different than any other 'amateur' style porn. No one is being spied on. It is not a 'voyeur' situation.
Other videos being posted into the 'voyeur' category that really don't belong are amateur sex videos. A good example would be a series of videos from "Posthim" that were put up 3 days ago. These are just amateur sex films. No one is being spied on.
"Voyeur" videos are videos where a camera has been hidden, or if it is a themed porn movie, where someone is being spied upon without knowing. The literal definition of "voyeur" is "a person who obtains sexual pleasure or excitement from the observation of someone undressing, having intercourse, etc…" If we were using that definition then ALL pornography would be under this category because we are all just watching people have sex. The sub-definition is "peeping Tom".
Those of us who want videos of this nature look to this category for them, and it is flooded with inappropriately labeled videos!Usually ACTUAL public sex videos fall into this category as well. For instance a TRULY amateur video of a man filming himself jacking off on a public beach with people around, or in a rest stop getting a blow job at the urinal... that is voyeuristic. Produced porn movies where the porn models are having sex 'outisde' (which is usually on private land or hidden somewhere behind a building) is not remotely the same.
As for the "Softcore" category... this has just become a dumping ground for muscle modeling videos or amateur porn where the men simply jerk-off.
"Softcore" porn is pornography in which everything is the same as hard core porn except no penetration is shown. That includes oral sex. Sometimes there is jerking off, but usually no cum shots. A video of muscle men, nude or in a bikini brief, posing and flexing is NOT 'softcore'. Just because it features hot men and it doesn't have nudity doesn't make it softcore porn! And videos of men jacking off until they cum are just porn - jack-off porn, and there is a "SOLO" category for that!
It used to be that a video of softcore would only turn up now and then and for those of us who enjoy it it was a great surprise. Right now if you look at the last 100 videos posted in "Softcore", you have to scroll all the way back five weeks to find "Vista Video - Muscle Dreams", the ONLY actual softcore movie posted in that time frame.
I don't know if the solution is to add more categories, or what to do. Perhaps we need a "Muscle Modeling/Posing" category. A lot of the videos from voyeur simply need to be sorted into their appropriate porn category. (All the Czech Hunter videos belong in "twinks," and the "Posthim" videos belong in an "Amateur" category, which I'm surprise we don't have!)
I know the moderators are doing their best and they do a great job. I just want the site to be the best that it can be, and this is my suggestion and pointing out of what I think is a problem. Please do not take offense! xoxo
-
Please use the "report" button for this, so the staff can move them to their proper categories.
I do agree with you and I'm glad you made this thread.
-
Yes, please by all means report such torrents.
However, to avoid a flooting of the staff with reports, you don't need to report "Czech Hunter" and "Post Him" torrents. If you report another and there are more of that series wrong, mention it with the first report and wiat with further reports of that series.
I guess where most help with reports is required will be the "Softcore" category.
-
Just my two cents.
Real 'voyeur' movies raise an ethical point as almost by definition the people have not consented for their pictures to be taken or distributed. I'm not sure I would appreciate a movie of my ablutions broadcast to the world.
And the definition of 'softcore' you give raises some problems. You say it covers everything but 'penetration'. But what about films that are clearly erotic but have no sex?
I suppose, in the end, the definition is largely subjective
PS 'vintage' has a fairly elastic definition too
-
speaking of Vintage… can there be a search for Vintage + Older Men?
-
I'm not sure the search is ready to do 'and' searches yet. And most people only tag their torrents with just one tag. I think it's being worked on but don't quote me…
-
If you type "vintage older men", all three words must be present somewhere in, not collated, in the description …
Yes, multiple categories is a project started, but don't ask me when it will pop-up.
