Why "covid booster" should be viewed skeptically

blablarg18

Vinay Prasad, M.D. biostatistics professor.

Note: Brown skin. Meaning you libs, to be consistent & Woke, are required to believe his every word.

New boosters were tested on about 8 mice only; not one human (before general population)
Covid vaxx are now well known to give people far more reactions & "adverse events" than real vaccines
Flu vaccines handle future strains (coming from Southern hemisphere); covid vaxx handle only past strains, extinct variants that no longer exist
Covid today is milder than flu; especially harmless to young people
Maybe "annual flu shot" is a bad model never to be emulated
ties in to point 1: the mRNA technology is still new & "unknown" re: REPEATED shots over long periods
FDA today basically a mouthpiece for Big Pharma, much to be suspected
Key longtime FDA servants been resigning because so uncomfortable with point 6
FDA & CDC today basically run by political appointees, lie a lot or at least mislead
FDA & CDC still trying to shove out the vaxx with a weird data-free urgency, could be commercial or political
ok now he just repeats 8 & 9
Key vaxx DEFENDERS, such as Dr. Paul Offit of CHOP, turn against booster with quotes like the following:

"I have received three doses of ancestral strain vaccine and contracted a mild case of covid in May. As a result, all the evidence suggests that I have high frequencies of virus-specific B and T cells, which should protect me against severe disease this winter. I do not plan to get another dose...until it is clear that people who have been primed, boosted and naturally infected are nonetheless at high risk of serious illness..."

All that's apart from the myocarditis that's been hitting YOUNG, ATHLETIC men (cough).