"objectum sexual"
-
https://www.ladbible.com/community/woman-opens-up-on-her-sexual-relationship-with-plane-20220530
Sarah Rodo, 23, is ‘objectum sexual’, which means that she is sexually attracted to inanimate objects, and says she is head over heels in love with the plane, that she refers to as her boyfriend.If you scroll down, there's an article about a 28yo woman in Hungary in the same situation.
-
Why has this been posted in the Politics and Debate section?
-
-
@raphjd Who says that she is on the left. And btw if you are only interested in individual persons, then there are a lot of crazy people on the right, like this person
Youtube Video -
It's not just 1 person, you guys have created an entire culture around making up new genders and sexualities. On top of that, you then label it as "trans", because you redefined what "trans" actually means. You did this so you can call your enemies transphobic.
-
@raphjd I have not created any culture. And about "trans" that is science, not made up. And I haven't written about "trans", you made a statement about a crazy person, and I just posted that crazy persons do also exist on the right.
-
You are on the left and it's your side that does it.
Cake gender and Paint gender are not science based, but you lefties claim they are genders and classify them as "trans".
Trans does have a basis in science, but you guys have taken all science away from it and turned it into a clown world shit show.
-
@raphjd I haven't heard ANY that say that cake gender or paint gender is about trans. Well you are doing that, and you are on the right. Gender is about gender, not trans rights.
-
Trans is more than rights. It's about trans-GENDERism.
Cake gender and paint gender are GENDERS to your looney side.
-
I'd love to hear a hard science explanation of gender (specifically, one that doesn't confuse the term with "sex"). Gender is an artifact, i.e., it is a creation of humankind. Any "scientific" statements about gender are "ought" statements spoken by someone committing the Ought/Is Fallacy of Reasoning. Nature cannot tell us what "ought" to be. It can only tell us what "is."
People inventing new genres of gender are just playing with the artificial nature of the concept of gender. Essentially at Deconstructionist critique of the concept, even if they themselves wouldn't call it that.
Just as society is becoming more Relativistic toward morality, it's also becoming more Relativistic about archaic concepts like gender and societal roles. @raphjd just can't deal with the fact that his notions are becoming obsolete.
-
So much mental gymnastics to explain the liberal insanity.
It's like how you guys redefined "racism" so only whites can be racist.
What I can't deal with is lunatics demanding that I participate in their idiotic clown world.
