Facebook censorship pisses me off
-
One of my facebook friends posted a story about their being aliens on the moon today.
I replied with this video, but it was instantly blocked and tagged as SPAM by facebook!I wonder if Facebook has ever heard of "censorship" and realize that it is illegal.
-
Censorship is only illegal by a government body (excluding courts), in the US. The US is the only country with "free speech".
While we (GT.ru staff) believe in free speech, we do have rules about certain things.
-
Censorship is only illegal by a government body (excluding courts), in the US. The US is the only country with "free speech".
While we (GT.ru staff) believe in free speech, we do have rules about certain things.
The impression I get is that although the USA supposedly has "free speech".. that protection only seems to be applied to radical moonbats and groups such as BLM.
Some idiot can say something absurd and get away with it because they are protected by free speech.. but if I say something poignant and factual.. I get censored. -
Sadly, social media is run by a bunch of brain-dead assclowns on the far left.
I'm far more pissed off about the way universities are taking federal $$$$ while denying those they disagree with their right to free speech.
-
hahahaha another clown who thinks freedom of speech applies when using privately owned social media applications like fb and twitter. You agreed to follow their terms of service when you signed up AND you are free yell your ignorant hate fill right wing nut job <60 IQ ideologies at the top of your lungs but no one owes you a microphone and a loudspeaker.
-
:police: tone it down :police:
-
hahahaha another clown who thinks freedom of speech applies when using privately owned social media applications like fb and twitter. You agreed to follow their terms of service when you signed up AND you are free yell your ignorant hate fill right wing nut job <60 IQ ideologies at the top of your lungs but no one owes you a microphone and a loudspeaker.
Talk about IQ under 60.. what sort of lunatic moonbat would risk their access to the site by firing off incendiary comments like that? Even I got threatened with a vagina in my face when I even hinted at people of low IQs. (That gives me an idea…).
As for the TOS of social media... their TOS must be legal. Facebook's are not. Buried in their TOS is a bit which allows them to access the camera on your computer! Also, they do sometimes ask for your full social security number as a form of identification.. that is illegal. When even one part of a contract is illegal, the whole thing is illegal. Also.. a TOS is not a legal document. It means pretty much nothing. For one thing, they continually CHANGE the TOS from the time you signed up.
When people become aware of Facebook's practices, they will be outraged, and the stock price of Facebook will crumble overnight. Remember previous huge social media services such as Prodigy, AOL, Myspace? They are all either gone or on life support.
-
And you don't see the irony of my access to the site being threatened for something I said in argument against your argument against freedom of speech on social media? I see 60 is an overestimate.
-
And you don't see the irony of my access to the site being threatened for something I said in argument against your argument against freedom of speech on social media? I see 60 is an overestimate.
I'm waiting for that apology from you about my IQ. My little feelings are bruised.. I need some PlayDoh…
Unwarranted personal attacks are verboten... or at least I thought they were.Keep it up, and I will pop you like a zit.
-
And you don't see the irony of my access to the site being threatened for something I said in argument against your argument against freedom of speech on social media? I see 60 is an overestimate.
Fred can't threaten anyone's access to the site. He can warn people that their actions might lead to being blocked from the site for breaking the rules.
-
And you don't see the irony of my access to the site being threatened for something I said in argument against your argument against freedom of speech on social media? I see 60 is an overestimate.
Fred can't threaten anyone's access to the site. He can warn people that their actions might lead to being blocked from the site for breaking the rules.
Shami94 doesn't read very well.. I repeatedly said that he was putting HIMSELF at risk. My preferred solution would be to have full "freedom of speech" and crush him like the cockroach he is. Moonbats ALWAYS hide behind the shield of "Freedom of Speech", but then when that Freedom of Speech is used by people they don't like, they go into a tizzy. I'm fine with Freedom of Speech.
-
And when RWNJ conservatives say "Freedom of Speech" and "Freedom of Religion" they always mean "Freedom of MY speech" and "Freedom of MY Religion" but not anyone else's.
Typically you see RWNJs scream freedom of religion when the are asked to supply flowers to a gay wedding, but the very same people want to rip the religious clothes off a Muslim woman or want to ban Halal.
The same people who cry and wet their beds over "political correctness" and their hate speech being pulled down off social media are the people trying to shut down media organisations critical of the Trumpanzee.
The very same people who think that Catholic Canon law should allow Catholic priest to disobey civil law and protect pedophiles from the police go blue in their faces with rage if Muslims suggest that they be allowed to abide by some elements of Islamic religious law.
-
And when RWNJ conservatives say "Freedom of Speech" and "Freedom of Religion" they always mean "Freedom of MY speech" and "Freedom of MY Religion" but not anyone else's.
Typically you see RWNJs scream freedom of religion when the are asked to supply flowers to a gay wedding, but the very same people want to rip the religious clothes off a Muslim woman or want to ban Halal.
The same people who cry and wet their beds over "political correctness" and their hate speech being pulled down off social media are the people trying to shut down media organisations critical of the Trumpanzee.
The very same people who think that Catholic Canon law should allow Catholic priest to disobey civil law and protect pedophiles from the police go blue in their faces with rage if Muslims suggest that they be allowed to abide by some elements of Islamic religious law.
You are so full of fertilizer.. it would be fascinating to see an MRI done of your brain. Have you had bad LSD trips?
-
I'm sorry, but it's the left who sets occupied buildings on fire to prevent speech they don't like.
It's the left that smashes people over the head with bike locks who disagree with them. They even smash people over the head for trying to prevent fighting.
It's the left that claims the moral high ground but needs to hide their faces.
It's the left that fakes hate crimes for whatever reason du jour.
-
"It's the left that claims the moral high ground but needs to hide their faces."
Do you mean like the KKK?
-
"It's the left that claims the moral high ground but needs to hide their faces."
Do you mean like the KKK?
I'm glad you made the comparison.
Finally, you leftists are figuring it out.
