• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents

    BMA says women no longer get pregnant, people do

    Politics & Debate
    5
    7
    2661
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • raphjd
      raphjd Forum Administrator last edited by

      https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2017/01/29/doctors-urged-to-use-gender-neutral-pregnant-people-instead-of-mothers/

      Doctors urged to use gender neutral ‘pregnant people’ instead of ‘mothers’

      Let's not forget that SJWs claim that SJWs only exist in the minds of their critics and things like this don't actually happen in real life.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A
        aadam101 last edited by

        This is just stupid nonsense.  I feel like we are going back in time.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • E
          Eridanos last edited by

          @aadam101:

          This is just stupid nonsense.  I feel like we are going back in time.

          Back in time?! Our brains are practically de-evolving!

          And this is stupid as fuck…political correctness at it's finest.

          If you're treating a trans or intersex pregnant person you could just call him/her an 'expectant parent', no use to make a stupid law.

          Nice one pitting the feminists against the trans community...you politically correct assholes.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Spintendo
            Spintendo last edited by

            @raphjd:

            Doctors urged to use gender neutral ‘pregnant people’ instead of ‘mothers’

            Let's not forget that SJWs claim that …. things like this don't actually happen in real life.

            Sorry to disappoint you Henny Penny—but the sky is not falling.  :cheerup:

            This suggestion came about when a pregnant patient born anatomically female but who identifies as male did not wish to be called "mother" several times during his visit with clinicians. An advisory notice was circulated, gently reminding clinicians that these rare instances can occur, and suggested not using labels like mother when interacting with them.


            The speed of light from Earth to the Moon in real time (c = 3×10^8 m/s)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A
              aadam101 last edited by

              @Spintendo:

              @raphjd:

              Doctors urged to use gender neutral ‘pregnant people’ instead of ‘mothers’

              Let's not forget that SJWs claim that …. things like this don't actually happen in real life.

              Sorry to disappoint you Henny Penny—but the sky is not falling.  :cheerup:

              This suggestion came about when a pregnant patient born anatomically female but who identifies as male did not wish to be called "mother" several times during his visit with clinicians. An advisory notice was circulated, gently reminding clinicians that these rare instances can occur, and suggested not using labels like mother when interacting with them.

              That's all well and good but why does the whole world need to change just for a very small number of people.  It's not that serious.  I don't know why they couldn't just put a note in the persons record.

              I used to work in a call center and every once in a while a woman with a deep voice would be called "sir" because the phone rep didn't realize they were talking to a woman.  They would put a note in the file and hopefully if the person called again the same honest mistake wouldn't get made.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • gaypraha2
                gaypraha2 last edited by

                Back in time?! Our brains are practically de-evolving!

                Oh but WE ARE ! take a look at IQ test average since they exist , we are dumber than decades ago seriously…

                1408624676156_wps_5_World_IQ_graph_jpg.jpg

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • raphjd
                  raphjd Forum Administrator last edited by

                  @Spintendo:

                  Sorry to disappoint you Henny Penny—but the sky is not falling.  :cheerup:

                  This suggestion came about when a pregnant patient born anatomically female but who identifies as male did not wish to be called "mother" several times during his visit with clinicians. An advisory notice was circulated, gently reminding clinicians that these rare instances can occur, and suggested not using labels like mother when interacting with them.

                  But 1 person requires a rule change?

                  Will they add "attack helicopter" to the tick box list for sex?  If not, why not?

                  Why won't the BMA bow down to me and tell everyone to refer to my hair color as  "similar to a sofa I once saw"?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                  • 1 / 1
                  • First post
                    Last post