To shave or not to shave pubic hair?
-
do you shave your pubis hair? yes or no? why?
-
After shaving it is more comfortable. Personally I prefer trimming.
-
It depends on what you like. I like hairy men. I myself like to trim my bush
-
I do not.
I'm hairy and I like hairy guys too -
never shave but i do trim
-
I prefer to shave. I prefer feeling smooth and groomed. It really is down to the individual. Try it, if you don't like it, then you know
;D
-
I'm hairy. I always trim my body hair as it grow quite fast. I prefer to shave my pubic area because I like it smooth.
-
I never shave it completely but I do like to keep it neat and trimmed
-
i like to keep my balls and shaft real smooth because it feels good (not least when jerking off) + it looks nice, but just above the base i keep it all although maintaining it rather short (i feel like it's bestowed upon few of us to look good when completely clean shaven down there, but the important thing is that one is comfyyy so)!
-
At puberty, when a man's balls drop and begin to function, body hair grows at pit and pube. It takes more than a dozen years for most men to exhibit those signs of sexual capability, the decorative curls and bristles that mark the rising testosterone production that makes sperm production such a potent and motivating force. The growth of a lush pubic bush flourishing wild in the most animal part of a man, where the equipment for breeding is luxuriantly displayed for the pleasure of those allowed to glimpse what even a broad treasure trail can only suggest, and what a little peach fuzz on an unshaved upper lip is as daring a display of developing dick functionality as most every early teenage wanker allows as advertisement short of changing room or the curvaceous allure of obscenely unconcealed bulges in Speedos ("budgie smugglers") clinging to flesh as an advertisement for potential pleasures to delight interested observers.
Yes, shaved pubes may make the cock look bigger, but also makes a developed young man revert to a look seemingly designed to attract pedophiles and portray a nonexist innocence and physical immaturity. Twinks barely of legal age may not have their full proportions of arm and leg, chest and abs, but however babyfaced they may be, a nascent thatch around the goodies automatically proclaims them at least on the verge of living life with a fully active and well functioning manhood.
Also, frankly, after frantic fapping, to have fresh white cream spurted out and sprinkled over the growing hair like morning dew on tender blades of grass is my idea of a highly attractive mess– an "attractive nuisance," to borrow a legal term. Roman candle eruptions of boiling semen, white hot eruptions landing in pools and lakes of whitest impurity on smooth flesh, naked abs, and so on are attractive too, but to me it looks more like a boy at play has accomplished a man's work if there is a thatch involved in the visuals.
Generally speaking, a male can piss anywhere, fap any time, and is allowed to be "hairy and horny and ready to shack." And a burgeoning bush on a fully mature man of muscle is something boys, and adults as well, used to consider a sign of masculinity and of manly sexual development. Now, apparently lots of men would rather shave and deal with the resulting itch of regrowth, or at least trim to the point of having almost as limited a landing strip as a woman. Apparently carnality is supposed to be ultrahygenic and as discretely antiseptic as possible. Perhaps that goes with an entire generation of happy fuckers who have never bumped nasties without a condom and thus have never had to contend with drying DNA pasted into a wet spot.
Perhaps that means sex is no longer "dirty," even though when some of us were developing our genitalia to please ourselves and others, sex as always dirty "if it was done right." (Old joke, with more than a hint of truth.) Maybe that's why there is such a growing interest in and acceptance of water sports-- the need for raunch that plain fucking and sucking no longer supplies when smoothly shaved animal evidence is diminished as much as possible.
This hairless fetish even leads to burly brutes with shaggy chests and hairy Pan-like goat legs coated with fur to remove all evidence of fur from vicinity of cock and ball, and armpits made to look like those of some dainty finishing school damoiselle. Now there's a contradiction in visuals! All of that may be change, but it ain't progress.
-
I prefer a man to look like a man - complete with pubic hair. Maybe trim it slightly if very long, but in general it should be left intact.
This fetish for being hairless is just plain weird.
-
Personally, no matter how handsome a man is, when I see that he has no pubic hair, or trimmed all the way down, it is an automatic turn off to me. If I wanted to be with someone smooth, I would be with a woman. I want to be with a man, not an adolescent. It is very unappealing to me and a major turn off. Men, grow your pubes back!
-
Personally, no matter how handsome a man is, when I see that he has no pubic hair, or trimmed all the way down, it is an automatic turn off to me. If I wanted to be with someone smooth, I would be with a woman. I want to be with a man, not an adolescent. It is very unappealing to me and a major turn off. Men, grow your pubes back!
true dat
-
no, i dont shave my pubic hair. i only trim because i felt like a prepubescent boy when i did it once and it felt kinda creepy in a pedo bear kind of way.
-
I don't shave but I trim it. Love to see it tidy down there.
-
Trim my pubes and shave my balls. The smaller the bush the taller the tree, right? Plus, when I keep my pubes trimmed, my bf is more inclined to give me blowjobs. As for shaving my balls, theres nothing quite like a smooth scrotum. It just feels better to me.
-
Nope. ANd I like my guys with a nice bush. I especially love when asian guys have long straight hair. Its hot. I like the way it brushes my cheek when giving head.
-
I prefer a man to look like a man - complete with pubic hair. Maybe trim it slightly if very long, but in general it should be left intact.
This fetish for being hairless is just plain weird.
Personally, no matter how handsome a man is, when I see that he has no pubic hair, or trimmed all the way down, it is an automatic turn off to me. If I wanted to be with someone smooth, I would be with a woman. I want to be with a man, not an adolescent. It is very unappealing to me and a major turn off. Men, grow your pubes back!
I agree. It's the hair, au naturel, coupled with its pattern, color, texture and wisp that makes HIS box different from everyone else's. Don't touch a thing… If the quality of pre-condom vids were better, that's all I'd watch... besides, smooth looks like something you can buy off a shelf, what's not on that shelf is a life-like imitation of anyone's unshaved box. I'm also confused by those who prefer hard to soft. To me, hard is hard. Only in the flaccid state does the true look show. Now, let's talk about the guys who shave to make their penises look bigger. What am I missing? If it only looks bigger, how does that matter? Besides, the male g-spot is only about 3-4 inches in... so how can penises longer than 4 or so inches be any more effective? (It's the rub of the rim of the head which usually does the trick.) AND, what about those who do it for a blow job? I want everyone of you guys to look in the mirror and tell yourselves you're special because there's no one else like you. Then go out and buy a bottle of corn huskers lotion and let Rosie Palms give it a shot. I haven't found anything or anyone yet who can hold a candle to her! HA.
-
I do shave, it looks better (in my opinion) and feels better. And I like men who shave their pubic hair. I really hate hairs in my mouth while giving a blowjob for example. But if the guy doesn't have it wouldn't be such a problem for me. There are other things much more important that the pubic hair or its absence.
-
I don't myself, tried it and wasn't keen, I do like my man to be lightly trimmed, but not too much.
