So, I still don't get the difference between Hunks and Jocks…
-
So, I still don't get the difference between Hunks and Jocks, and, apparently, I'm not the only one. I saw that someone else has already asked the same question, but the answers were unclear, at least for me (have mercy, I'm italian, we don't have such different words to describe guys we want to hook up with) (and please, don't blame me for my english, just tell me where I'm wrong).
Then, this Brandon is Hunk or Jock, or maybe none of both? And why?
-
And Adam Russo, Hunk or Jocks, or something different? And why? I suppose he doesn't fit in the same category of Brandon, or am I wrong?
-
And someone like Dakota Ford, does it fit in one of the category? Or is something like twink? And yes, a reason it would be helpful…
-
and feel free to add your own examples, anything that help me understand is welcomed
-
Hunks are muscular bodybuilding type of body shape, while Jocks are more the athletic type.
It depends often on the person looking at the models, so here my opinion:
The first is Hunk and perhaps Jock (from the age point of view, too old for Youngblood, too young for mature)
The second is Hunk (though he is missing some muscle weight) and Bear (though he got his body hair trimmed) and could fit into Mature (though some will find him too young)
The last fits IMHO best into Jocks (he is clearly beyond the typical twink age) perhaps Youngblood
-
Hunks are muscular bodybuilding type of body shape, while Jocks are more the athletic type.
It depends often on the person looking at the models, so here my opinion:
The first is Hunk and perhaps Jock (from the age point of view, too old for Youngblood, too young for mature)
The second is Hunk (though he is missing some muscle weight) and Bear (though he got his body hair trimmed) and could fit into Mature (though some will find him too young)
The last fits IMHO best into Jocks (he is clearly beyond the typical twink age) perhaps Youngblood
I see it as Hunks are sexy/handsome, but they don't have to be athletic/muscular, where as jocks have to be athletic/muscular but they don't have to be sexy/handsome.
The first photo of Jeff/Brandon. IMO he is a hunk and a Jock
The second photo IMO he could be a hunk/jock/bear
The last photo IMO based on what I learned this week he would be youngblood and maybe a jock -
hmmm..nice question. Now that you have mentioned it, i wonder about the difference between the two
-
I agree with Popper. Hunks are bodybuilder type of guys with visible muscle weight and jocks would be athletic boys with much slimmer bodies. Being handsome has nothing to do with body type as it is a matter of personal preference.
So, the first guy would fit into the athletic category, as well as the second one although he's much more mature compared to the first one (but his age doesn't make him a hunk), and the third one is youngblood and has no body shape in order to be called athletic, let alone a hunk.
Unfortunately, when categorizing torrents people like to throw a lot of crap into Hunks category, leaving out Jocks when it's only a matter of body shape and muscle weight. We all have eyes, don't we?
-
For me hunks is the general term. So all three are hunks.
It's jocks when they have an article of clothing that represents them as an athlete or something like a basketball or a bat or something they do on the clips like wrestling or playing ball or when they are in a locker room.
As for the twinks - I usually see them as teens. So over twenty isn't a youngblood for me. So there's no twinks in my book among those pictures.
-
anch'io nn sapevo della differenza…ora è tutto più chiaro ;D
-
I don't think 'jock' is a great descriptor for use in porn. Jocks are athletes, they play sports, they stay fit by playing sports. 'Jock' doesn't describe a body type, it describes an athlete.
Hunks may be jocks and vice versa, but I think most guys we generally think of as hunks are in shape because they consciously take care of their body in a gym rather than on a court or in a field. They also tend to be older because athletes tend to be younger. But hunks can have the exact same body type as jocks but not be jocks because they don't play sports.
-
I also have a difficulty to compare those type, Hunk and Jock. But, I think I've found easiest way to separate them some time ago . Hunk has (always) bigger body (weight and muscle) than jock. By this comparison, you can see a clearer (or more obvious) the different between Brandon, Adam Russo and the last model. As already mentioned above, Brandon and Adam tend to be a Hunk while Dakota is a jock.
-
When voting for videos, I made my own guideline:
by age:
youngblood: under 20 or at least looks like he is under 20
jocks: between 20 and 30.
mature: between 30 and 50.
grey/old: above 50by built:
hunks: very muscular/bodybuilding type.
twinks: the non-muscular/thin type.
of course there is the regular/athletic type in the middleso for your examples, in my opinion:
1. jock
2. mature
3. jockimo, none of them is in the hunk category..
-
jock, hunk, youngblood/jock
-
I agree with dropear classification.. but on this site, if you are into youngbloods or twinks you'd better tick " jocks' as well as it seems sometimes people upload in the wrong category..and of course the other way around.. like the hunks category contains youngblood even twinks or jocks.. or twink cat might contains hunks..it's a bit of a mess to be honest mostly because this a personal appreciation.. ;D
-
If you go by none sexual or gay ways to categorise guys then jock is someone who is athletic and plays sports, I think jock has to be under 30 tho as they are usually associated with high school or universities, they do need to have an a fit body. Hunks in other hand can be older guys and doesn't need to be very athletic or have big muscles, but as long as they are handsome and carry themselves well and are confident. you can just tell when you see a hunk.
The first guy is definitely more of a jock but can be a hunk too.
Second I would say is more of a hunk
And third is definitely more of a jock. -
**_Came across with this reply courtesy of a certain "Tigermom" (personally I am also confused with the difference) but here is her answer
Hunk - very good looking guy. Definition of what is good looking can vary, obviously, but usually this is the equivalent of "babes" in straight porn. They should look like they came out of a commercial, clean, smooth, good-smelling. Some muscle is expected, and they're lean, usually with abs showing nicely. They're not bodybuilder types though.
Jock - this one is trickier. It's not a sports fan, but an athlete. Jocks are college guys who excel in sports. They would have the same look at a hunk/stud but usually there's a clear sports connection (i.e. they're shown in locker rooms, in sports uniform etc, or they just tell you the guy is a member of the college Rugby team or whatever)._**
-
Hunks are muscular bodybuilding type of body shape, while Jocks are more the athletic type.
It depends often on the person looking at the models, so here my opinion:
The first is Hunk and perhaps Jock (from the age point of view, too old for Youngblood, too young for mature)
The second is Hunk (though he is missing some muscle weight) and Bear (though he got his body hair trimmed) and could fit into Mature (though some will find him too young)
The last fits IMHO best into Jocks (he is clearly beyond the typical twink age) perhaps Youngblood
I think this one is clear to me… now, the different hairy man categories... that's another hard one
-
then there are twunks too if you wanna go there, twinkish but muscular, though not muscular enough to be a hunk/jock or whatever the distinction is
