• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. roadhog2001 0
    3. Posts
    R
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 3
    • Posts 4
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by roadhog2001 0

    • RE: help with how rawfuckclub operates now

      @ianfontinell-0 i wish i knew whether their rules have always been like this. my fear is something like: “oh, the video is old, so we didn’t review it,” but it still stays up, kind of a grandfathered situation.
      as for the other topics, thank you for helping me understand!

      posted in Non-GT.ru Technical Stuff
      R
      roadhog2001 0
    • help with how rawfuckclub operates now

      hello, i’d like to clear up a few doubts i have about rawfuckclub. i want to be upfront and explain that i have really severe ocd when it comes to pornography. i know that, objectively, my ocd doesn’t make much sense, especially because i’m only attracted to mature bear men.

      still, i compulsively check whether sites are compliant with 18 u.s.c. §2257, whether all models were properly verified, and whether everything is fully consensual. this ocd is something that appeared suddenly in 2022 for no reason at all, i didn’t have these fears or compulsions before. i’m currently trying to deal with it and manage it better, because i understand that it’s irrational. i genuinely wish i could consume adult content the same way i used to, without the constant anxiety.

      so.. rawfuckclub is a user-based platform the site itself doesn’t upload the videos, they are uploaded by other production companies or by the performers themselves (kinda like onlyfans). i only click on videos where the uploader or producer is verified by the site and has the verification check mark. however, there are still some stuff that i want to be more clear. i sent an email but didn’t receive a response. i also tried to carefully read the rules, but there are SO many of them and my english isn’t perfect. i’d like to know whether the videos on this site are truly safe and compliant because it was my favorite one years ago. below is the list of questions i sent to them, i’ll copy and paste them here:

      i have noticed that some videos appear to come from accounts without a “verified” badge. could you please clarify whether videos from accounts without this badge are still fully verified internally?
      are all models and co-performers in every video confirmed and verified to be over 18 years old with government id, regardless of whether the account has a verified badge or not? if a video was uploaded before new site rules were implemented, do the current rules now apply to those older videos, or are they grandfathered under the rules at the time of upload?
      how does the system handle cases where blanket releases or third-party releases are used for consent?
      could you explain what non-commercial videos are? are they verified in any way, and how are they displayed to the public compared to commercial content?
      in short, is it possible for a commercial video to appear on your site without proper verification, even if the account does not display the verified badge? i would greatly appreciate a clear and detailed explanation, as i want to fully understand how verification works for accounts, videos, and co-performers on your platform. thank you very much for your time and assistance.
      i know it sounds unhinged and weird, but this is the way i’m able to deal with my ocd at the moment.

      posted in Non-GT.ru Technical Stuff
      R
      roadhog2001 0
    • Is vintage porn from reputable studios safe?

      Is vintage porn from reputable studios safe? I found out that in the 60s and 70s, pornography with underage (below 18) people was "legal." So I was wondering, are studios like Colt Studio Group, Falcon Studios, and Catalina Video Distributors, which were founded in the late 60s, safe to watch? I even read that videos from before 1995 were exempt from the 2257 law, and that weirded me out a lot.
      I really don't want to accidentally see something illegal, so should I just avoid watching anything from these sites, or are they safe today because of their reputation?

      posted in Porn
      R
      roadhog2001 0
    • confusing 2257 statement section on porn sites

      whenever i visit an unfamiliar site, I always check the 18 U.S. Code § 2257 statement section first. however, i came across a confusing passage and I'm lost. It might be a language barrier thing, but I’m struggling to understand the highlighted part. does it mean illegal stuff may appear? should i just take only the first part into consideration? can someone explain it to me like i'm five? it's from hotoldermale (there's others like this too):

      "Compliance Statement:

      All models, actors, actresses and other persons that appear in any visual depiction of actual sexually explicit conduct appearing or otherwise contained in this Website were over the age of eighteen (18) years at the time of the creation of such depictions.

      All other pictures, graphics, videos or other visual media contained in this production are exempt from the provision of 18 U.S.C. Section 2257, or any amendments thereto, and 28 C.F.R. 75 because said visual media do not consist of depictions of conduct as specifically listed in 18 U.S.C Section 2256 (2) (A) through (D), but are merely depictions of non-sexually explicit nudity, or are depictions of simulated sexual conduct, or are otherwise exempt because the visual depictions were created prior to July 3, 1995.

      The records required by Title 18, Section 2257 of the United States Code are kept at the office of the producer at the following location.."

      so, should i worry? hotoldermale/pantheon and older4me seems like a big companies and are up to 20 years in the market.. I don't think they would put illegal content on their website

      but i don't know how this works, so i dont know if i should be worried ☠️

      posted in Porn
      R
      roadhog2001 0
    • 1 / 1