• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents

    Bill to lift "don't ask, don't tell" blocked in Senate

    Gay News
    2
    2
    1372
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • leatherbear
      leatherbear last edited by

      The provision to repeal the ban on gays from serving openly in the military was included in a $726 billion defense policy bill.

      WASHINGTON (AP) - Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked an
      effort by Democrats and the White House to lift the ban on gays
      from serving openly in the military, voting unanimously against
      advancing a major defense policy bill that included the provision.
      The mostly partisan vote dealt a major blow to gay rights groups
      who saw the legislation as their best hope, at least in the short
      term, for repeal of the 17-year-old law known as "don't ask, don't
      tell."
      If Democrats lose seats in the upcoming congressional elections
      this fall, as many expect, repealing the ban could prove even more
      difficult - if not impossible - next year. The Senate could take up
      the measure again during a lame-duck session after the elections,
      but a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said he
      hasn't decided whether to do so.
      "The whole thing is a political train wreck," said Richard
      Socarides, a White House adviser on gay rights during the Clinton
      administration.
      Democrats included the repeal provision in a $726 billion
      defense policy bill, which authorizes a pay raise for the troops
      among other popular programs. In a deal brokered with the White
      House, the measure would have overturned the 1993 law banning
      openly gay service only after a Pentagon review and certification
      from the president that lifting the ban wouldn't hurt troop morale.
      But with little time left for debate before the November ballot,
      the bill had languished on the Senate calendar until gay rights
      groups, backed by pop star Lady Gaga, began an aggressive push to
      turn it into an election issue.
      Earlier this month a federal judge in Los Angeles declared the
      ban an unconstitutional violation of the due process and free
      speech rights of gays and lesbians. The decision was the third
      federal court ruling since July to assert that statutory limits on
      the rights of gays and lesbians were unconstitutional.
      Reid agreed to force a vote on the bill this week and limit
      debate, despite Republican objections. A Nevada Democrat in a tight
      race of his own this fall, he also pledged to use the defense bill
      as a vehicle for an immigration proposal that would enable young
      people to qualify for U.S. citizenship if they joined the military.
      Republicans alleged that Reid was using the defense bill to
      score political points with the Democratic base.
      "This is not a serious exercise. It's a show," said Senate GOP
      leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.
      Democrats countered that the bill merely reflects public
      opinion. Recent polls suggest that a majority of Americans think
      the ban on gays in the military should be overturned.
      "We're going to fight for this," said Sen. Carl Levin,
      D-Mich., chairman of the Armed Services Committee.
      But at least for now, the question of how and when to change the
      policy returns to the Pentagon, which had set a December deadline
      to complete a study of the effects of lifting the ban. Defense
      Secretary Robert Gates has said that he supports President Barack
      Obama's goal of repeal, but Gates made it clear he thought the
      process should move gradually.
      It is not clear how quickly the Pentagon might make its own
      recommendations. Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell declined to
      comment Tuesday on what he called "an internal procedural matter
      for the Senate."
      Initially, advocates had thought that Democrats might win the 60
      votes needed to overcome GOP objections and advance the bill. Sen.
      Susan Collins, a moderate Maine Republican, was seen as a crucial
      vote because she supports overturning the ban.
      But Collins ultimately sided with her GOP colleagues in arguing
      that the bill shouldn't advance because Republicans weren't given
      sufficient chance to offer amendments to the wide-ranging policy
      bill.
      Democrats also failed to keep all of their party members in
      line. Democratic Sens. Blanche Lincoln and Mark Pryor, both of
      Arkansas, voted with Republicans to scuttle the bill. The vote was
      56-43, four short of the 60 required to advance under Senate rules.
      Lincoln said she objected to the limits on debate and wanted a
      chance to offer amendments that would benefit her state. In a
      statement, Pryor said the bill deserved more serious debate than
      was being allowed.
      "There needs to be a genuine and honest effort to craft a
      defense bill that senators from both parties can support, because
      supporting our troops should not ever be a partisan issue," he
      said.
      When it became clear that Democrats would lose, Reid cast his
      own vote in opposition as a procedural tactic. Under Senate rules,
      doing so enables him to revive the bill at a later date.
      Reid spokesman Jim Manley said no decision had been made as to
      when Reid might call up the bill again.
      The episode upset many advocates, who believe that neither Obama
      nor Reid did enough to see the measure through. Meanwhile,
      conservative groups hailed the vote as a victory for the troops.
      "At least for now they will not be used to advance a radical
      social agenda," said Tony Perkins, president of the Family
      Research Council.
      An estimated 13,000 people have been discharged under the law
      since its inception in 1993. Although most dismissals have resulted
      from gay service members outing themselves, gay rights' groups say
      it has been used by vindictive co-workers to drum out troops who
      never made their sexuality an issue.

      ![](https://www.gaytorrent.ru/bitbucket/HOF 3.png)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • bluehue
        bluehue last edited by

        Great news for the tea-baggers; bad news for us actual tea-baggers.  😠

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

        • 1 / 1
        • First post
          Last post