Blue pictures? How much do porn stars get ?
-
Anyone familiar with that company? How much do porn stars earn per film? I'm curious please tell me!
-
I can only assume that it is like any other production company and the salary of the star is dependent on the terms of their contract. Why so curious? Did you get an offer from them for work?
edit: Here's a link to some general information about porn pay. hxxp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornographic_actor
-
Anyone familiar with that company?
I remember I downloaded a few years ago some movies from this producer and I liked them.
But there is no way to know watching those movies to know how much every actor earned.
Anyway, I heard that usually who tops earns a lot more because top men are very difficult to find: they are like the mutants "X-Men" in Marvel Comics, and "Decimation" plot. One endangered specie ;D
-
I can only assume that it is like any other production company and the salary of the star is dependent on the terms of their contract. Why so curious? Did you get an offer from them for work?
edit: Here's a link to some general information about porn pay. hxxp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornographic_actor
something like but i think its a sham
-
I can only assume that it is like any other production company and the salary of the star is dependent on the terms of their contract. Why so curious? Did you get an offer from them for work?
edit: Here's a link to some general information about porn pay. hxxp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornographic_actor
something like but i think its a sham
If I could get $200-$400 per scene to have sex with a guy I can't say I wouldn't consider as a great "side" job.
But you may be right, If something sounds to good to be true….then it probably is.
-
For what it is worth, the big red envelope company had a series of two disks about Gay porn in general; can you believe they censored out soft dick shots? Arghh…
Anyway, I read previous to this that Gay male porn stars get paid more, because for a long time, you could almost get straight guys for free, since they are so brainwashed that pussy is the only thing life is about.
But the worst thing about porn is that no one gets paid any royalties like they would in any other film performance.
-
Not to mention that depending on the porn and the studio, it's also potentially may cost a fair sum of money either in medications to stay alive, or through the magic of whatever you may catch from whoever. Sadly, most people don't think about this reality until after it's too late.
-
Maz - I wasn't being insensitive to health issues, I was just addressing the question of pay. You're absolutely right, catching something is serious business and that same series I mentioned said oddly enough bareback pays less. I would think it would be MORE and of course, the players were saying most of the companies don't have mandatory testing policies or if they do, all but the biggest don't follow them. Which is shameful.
-
the players were saying most of the companies don't have mandatory testing policies or if they do, all but the biggest don't follow them. Which is shameful.
That's very surprising. For porn industry testing to work, every production and actor would have to adhere to it, unless as suggested, it's largely a sham. If that's the case, surely there would be a bigger outcry from responsible studios and performers at being put at risk.
-
Martini - why would you assume there would be an outcry from more responsible businesses/performers? That would assume they all intersect, which they don't. And the porn business is different than say a company making pies. People in general are contradictory creatures, but America is particularly so when it comes to sex. On one hand we have endless garbage in the tabloids and Jerry Springer type TV shows about people's sex lives and yet you can't pass out condoms in most schools to teach kids to be responsible. (and I understand the mentality - I used to argue it when I was younger - "if you pass out condoms, you are saying the kids have no self-control….you doom them to failure before they even try...") And if a "responsible" porn business brings too much attention to the issue, they may rightly feel they are inviting too much government intervention.
-
They may not all intersect, but many are freelance performers and will work for different studios, plus they obviously have sex lives outside of the industry. I'm not suggesting that testing is foolproof, I'm sure the pitfalls have been discussed in other threads, but having some sort of mandatory testing is better than nothing, also important is counselling that emphasises that such testing shouldn't give a false sense of security.
If you look at it from the mercenary point of view, the self-preservation of the performers and continued profits for the studio producers would far outweight the fear of any government intervention -
Martini - one would think self preservation would be important, but look at the banks. The government gave them 700 billion, which was probably much closer to a trillion dollars. Ostensibly this was to stabilize the economy and free up credit. Neither of which happened. Much worse yet the banks issued dividends to stock holders, bonuses to SOME employees, vacations, spent lavishly on retreats in California and what not. Meanwhile, we are damn close to a real depression. People are losing their homes & jobs at a rate not seen since the depression of the 30's. The obvious point being what you THINK would be a rational course of events didn't happen. Speaking of homes, here's another example of non-logic - why foreclose on a home, to leave it vacant and then it becomes vandalized and worth possibly 10% of its original value? AND that course of action reduces the value of homes in the neighborhood? Because somehow it makes money and/or is a write off. But logically, (and morally) I would try to keep the homeowners in the home. Don't say it can't be done - a moratium on foreclosures passed most if not all state legislatures in the 1930's. Logic? You'd be amazed at how many people I attempt to discuss things with on facebook who claim to be Christian and they see no problem with CEO's making 100's of millions of dollars and paying a factory worker $10/hr and no benefits. After all, it is THEIR company, they worked hard (as if labor doesn't!) and let someone else start their own company if they don't like working for $10/hr. Obviously everyone is not capable of that nor is it possible in any economic system for "everyone to be at the top." To me it begs the question of what people think labor is worth. (this next "comment' is extreme I realize, but just to make sure I"m making my point - someone could decide that labor isn't worth anything and give wages just enough so that people had to live in a tent. Why not if you think CEO's are God and Labor is nothing?) I have no desire to have a 200 room house etc, and I have nothing against those who do. But to my way of thinking, 1% of the people having 65% of the income is absurd. If I bring this up, the response it "of course the rich have more money but they pay almost all the taxes too." These powerful or wannabee's use their leverage to negotiate deals etc. but watch what happens when labor tries to get a union - they force staff to attend anti union meetings, threaten to close up shop, move out of the USA etc. Some countermeasures are ethical, but all too often we find the CEO's lying and cooking the books. But this is how they think.
-
while I was watching a porn video couple of years ago I heard the producer who made the poor actor suck his cock saying : suck it well… I am not paying you thousand dollars an hour for this performance... you have to make my members happy
-
200$ - 3000$ for the bigger stars
