That underneath angle…
-
I need to know, is it just me?
I always get aggravated when they do that under camera angle where all you see is some ass getting plowed by some dick.
When I like a porn star, it's because of characteristics of that particular actor. So I like to see who he is, his body, face, etc.
But so many agencies will do that under shot where it could literally be anyone. I keep trying to skip past it and they keep going back to it : ' (
Anyone else not a fan? or do some of you actually like it?
-
I am not a fan of gay porn videography in general. Too many close-ups and weird camera angles for me. Moody lighting - where you cannot see a thing. 'Action' camerwork where the viewer's eye is never allowed to settle. Lazy ass camera-work where the lens follows a performer's face and half of the action is missed. I'm not blind. I don't need the camera to get in so close that I can see the hair follicles on a guy's balls. I like the whole picture - seeing who's doing what to whom. But studios/videographers so lack originality that they copy each other relentlessly. One person's bad habits soon spread.
I could go on (and on). However, I have not paid for any form of media (porn, movies TV or music) since around 2007/2008. So, if a porn scene is awful enough for me to shout at the screen and curse the man/woman/cretin who filmed it, I am happy to erase it from my PC and move on. ;D
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login