ONLYFANS IS COMMITING SUICIDE, save all the stuffs before it get deleted [updated with more details]

[6bryanlee]

onlyfans ban sex
www.independent.co.uk
www.bloomberg.com

OnlyFans is banning pornography posts, it has said.
The subscription platform has become famous in large part because it allows adult content creators to share videos with relatively few restrictions.But such videos will now be banned, in a decision OnlyFans said it had taken to “ensure the long-term sustainability of the platform”, it told The Independent.Posts containing nudity will still be allowed, so long as they comply with OnlyFans rules. But those rules will now specifically ban “any content containing sexually-explicit conduct”.
---OnlyFans said it had taken the decision “to comply with the requests of our banking partners and payout providers”. It did not give any information about which companies had made those requests.The announcement came only hours after Axios reported that the company had run into trouble securing investment, despite its very rapid growth, because of the prevalence of adult content on the platform. A number of venture capital firms have rules explicitly banning apps built to distribute sexually-explicit content, the site reported.
----The same report also showed the vast financial growth of the company, which it said has paid out billions of dollars to creators already and expects to grow rapidly. It is not clear how much of that revenue comes from pornography and adult content, and Axios reported that it is not mentioned in the company’s pitch to investors.
----OnlyFans said it was committed to ensuring that the creators who rely on the platform were helped through the ban. “We will be sharing more details in the coming days and we will actively support and guide our creators through this change in content guidelines,” it said in a statement.
----The new rule will go into effect from 1 October.
At the same time as it made its announcement, it released its first monthly transparency report, covering July 2021. The decision to release the reports was part of “our commitment to safety and transparency”, OnlyFans said.
OnlyFans has spent recent months looking to promote the variety of safe for work content that is offered on its platform. In March, it announced a prize fund to highlight the work of musicians on the app, and this week it announced it was launching a new streaming platform and app called OFTV which will be both free and offer only PG-rated content.

payment processors who are they
www.newsweek.com

In April MasterCard announced a change to their policy, which requires "the banks that connect merchants to our network... to certify that the seller of adult content has effective controls in place to monitor, block and, where necessary, take down all illegal content."
----These changes are to come into fruition on October 15 and include age and identity verification for content creators, a content review process before publication, complaint review processes within 7 days and a stringent appeals process for content to be removed.
---Mastercard's decision was lobbied for by Conservative groups such as National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE), formerly known as Morality in Media, and Exodus Cry.They have been targeting payment processors and credit card companies that work alongside pornographic sites, under the guise of abolishing sex trafficking and exploitation.
----When news of OnlyFans' ban broke, NCOSE released a statement explaining: "The announcement made by OnlyFans that it will prohibit creators from posting material with sexually explicit conduct on its website comes after much advocacy from NCOSE, survivors and allies."
----But it is not just Mastercard that are making trading difficult for the online sex industry, for in December 2020 the card company stood with Visa in banning payments to MindGeek, the parent company of pornography site such as PornHub.
----This was following allegations that they were hosting revenge porn, which is sexual imagery shared without the consent of the people who feature in it.The card companies only revoked the ban when unverified videos were deleted.This landscape, combined with the fact OnlyFans has also battled with higher processing costs from Visa and Mastercard because they charge more for those in the adult industry, has led to a ban on explicit content.
----Myles Jackman, an obscenity lawyer who specializes in cases related to pornography, tells Newsweek that the platform "has taken what appears to be the path of least resistance and transformed from a sex workers' site to an influencers' site."He explains while the actions of credit card companies has resulted in the ban, they were put in a "very difficult position." "They are commercial entities—risk-averse—and very aware of the temperature in America around sex trafficking as it is perceived to be a big problem." "They do not want to be accused of benefiting or financially engaging in sex trafficking." "They're being lobbied by anti-porn interests, which usually is a strange conference of radical feminists and fundamentalist Christians who just object to pornography."

what are the rules
read more about it in the link, their explanation was exceptional great
www.xbiz.com

How Different Sectors Will Be Affected: A Breakdown
Segpay’s Cathy Beardsley broke down how the new requirements, as she understands them, will affect different sectors:

Tubesites (e.g., Pornhub, XVideos) and Fan Sites (e.g., OnlyFans, JustFor.fans, FanCentro)

• Enter into a written agreement with any individual that is contributing content to the website. This includes the individual’s consent, their identity and age
• All persons depicted in the content must give consent for the content to be distributed and downloaded
• Age and identity of all persons depicted is required
• Only verified users can be permitted to upload content
• All content must be reviewed prior to publication, or real-time if it’s livestreamed, and no content can violate the Card Brand BRAM (Business Risk Assessment and Mitigation) policies
• Website must have a complaint process for reporting, review and removal of violating content
• Have policies in place to make sure that the website cannot be used for human trafficking
• Provide monthly reports to acquirer of flagged content and what was taken down
• No search terms or marketing partners give the illusion that the content they are marketing will contain child exploitation materials or depictions of non-consensual activity

Paysites

• Website must have a complaint process for reporting, review and removal of such content
• Takedown requests/flagged content will need to be reported monthly to the acquirer
• Have policies in place to make sure that the website cannot be used for human trafficking
• No search terms or marketing partners that give the illusion that the content they are marketing will contain child exploitation materials or depictions of non-consensual activity

Studios

• Not a requirement, but studios should keep BRAM policies in mind when shooting content
• Have model consent forms which verify users identity and tools in place to verify users (two forms of ID or tools), ensure model releases address the consent provisions of Mastercard’s update (consent to have the content downloaded may not be in a standard release)

Models/Content Makers

• Be prepared to provide identity and proof of identity

For Stabile, the Mastercard ruling “essentially treats all distributors of adult content as secondary producers, responsible for holding data and records for every person or producer on their site, as well as the identity of every uploader.”In his view, this is “likely to hurt smaller businesses who don't have the resources needed for record-keeping on that scale.”
“This has the potential to be detrimental to amateur and non-commercial producers, whether they're on tube sites or Reddit,” Stabile added. “Since the dawn of the internet, sexual communities have thrived thanks to the anonymity it provided. MasterCard is really punishing these communities.”

[6bryanlee]

@6bryanlee

so i think that is the reasons as it is very difficult for small website to implement these with the limited resources they have

and the not allow to edit and update a topic thing is pretty dumb, imo
i need to create a new topic just for it

[serenity]

@6bryanlee The American banks are completely too much and interfering into other countries business too. There was an example ,where a Danish man bought Cuban cigars from a German store, he got his money stolen from the American Bank because of the American boycott of Cuba, which Denmark and Germany are not a part of. How crazy is that.